Advertisement

Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 1031–1045 | Cite as

An experimental study on pile scour mitigating measures under waves and currents

  • SenDong Liang
  • YongLiang ZhangEmail author
  • James Yang
Article

Abstract

An experimental study has been carried out to investigate effects of four flow-altering scour countermeasures placed around a foundation pile under currents only as well as under coexisting waves and currents. The countermeasures are sacrificial piles, downstream bed sill, sleeve and slot in the pile. Their arrangements follow the suggested optimal configurations, with some of them slightly modified. In terms of the evolution of scour depth and bed topography around the pile, the scour countermeasures are evaluated, subjected to steady currents with or without irregular waves. A comparison between maximum scour depth with the countermeasures and one without the countermeasures demonstrates the efficiency of countermeasures. All the tested scour measures reduce the scour depth by 17.6%–42.6% under the action of currents only and 5.8%–24.0% under the combined action of both currents and waves. The results also show that it takes a shorter time for the scour depth to reach its equilibrium with the measures under either coexisting currents and waves or currents only than ones without the measures.

Keywords

experimental study scour countermeasures waves currents foundation pile 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Whitehouse R J S. Scour at Marine Structures. London: Thomas Telford, 1998Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melville B W, Coleman S E. Bridge Scour. LLC, USA: Water Resources Publications, 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liang S D, Zhang Y L. Analysis on the local scour around complex piers of a sea-crossing bridge (in Chinese). J Hydraul Eng, 2011, 42: 1334–1340MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rahman S, Akib S, Shirazi S M. Experimental investigation on the stability of bride girder against tsunami forces. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 2028–2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sumer B M, Fredsøe J, Christiansen N. Scour around vertical pile in waves. J Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Eng-Asce, 1992, 118: 15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shen H W, Schneider V R, Karaki S S. Mechanics of local scour. Report CER66HWS22, US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards. Washington, DC: Institute for Applied Technology, 1966Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melville B W. Local scour at bridge sites. Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Auckland New Zealand: School of Engineering, University of Auckland, 1975Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ettema R. Scour at bridge piers. Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Auckland: Auckland University, 1980Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chiew Y M. Local scour at bridge piers. Dissertation of Doctor Degree. School of Engineering, Auckland New Zealand: University of Auckland, 1984Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herbich J, Schiller Jr R, Watanabe R K, et al. Seafloor Scour: Design Guidelines For Ocean-Founded Structures. New York Basel: Marcel Dekker inc, 1984Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sumer B, Christiansen N, Fredsøe J. Influence of cross section on wave scour around piles. J Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Eng-Asce, 1993, 119, 477–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sumer B M, Fredsøe J. Wave scour around group of vertical piles. J Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Eng-Asce, 1998, 124: 248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sumer B M, Fredsøe J. Wave scour around a large vertical circular cylinder. J Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Eng-Asce, 2001, 127: 125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sumer B M, Fredsø, J. Time scale of scour around a large vertical cylinder in waves. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Japan: KitaKyushu, 2002, 55–60Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sumer B M, Fredsøe J. Scour around pile in combined waves and current. J Hydraulic Eng-Asce, 2001, 127: 403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sumer B M, Fredsøe J. The Mechanics of Scour in The Marine Environment. Singapore: World Scientific, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Qi W G, Gao F P. Equilibrium scour depth at offshore monopile foundation in combined waves and current. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 579: 1030–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sumer B M, Petersen T U, Locatelli L, et al. Backfilling of a scour hole around a pile in waves and current. J Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Eng-Asce, 2013, 139: 9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liang S D, Yang J, Zhang Y L. An Experimental study of scour countermeasures for offshore piles in marine environment. In: Proceedings of 2013 IAHR Congress. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2013Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chiew Y M. Scour protection at bridge piers. J Hydraulic Eng-Asce, 1992, 118: 1260–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Calomino F. Flow-altering countermeasures against scour at bridge piers: A review. J Hydraul Res, 2010, 48: 441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lagasse P F, Byars M S, Zevenbergen L W, et al. Bridge scour and stream instability countermeasures. FHWA HI-97-030 HEC-23, FHWA, 1997Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raaijmakers T, Van Oeveren M, Rudolph D, et al. Field performance of scour protection around offshore monopiles. In: Proceedings: International Conference on Scour and Erosion (ICSE-5). American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010: 339–428Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Melville B W, Hadfield A C. Use of sacrificial piles as pier scour countermeasures. J Hydraul Eng, 1999, 125: 1221–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim U Y, Park H, Yoo K H. Local scour countermeasure around bridge piers. In: International Conference on Computer Simulation in Risk Analysis and Hazard Mitigation. WIT Press, 2000: 543–551Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chiew Y M, Lim S Y. Protection of bridge piers using a sacrificial sill. In: Proceedings of the ICE-Water and Maritime Engineering, 2003, 156: 53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haque M A, Rahman M, Islam G M T, et al. Scour mitigation at bridge piers using sacrificial piles. Int J Sediment Res, 2007, 22: 49–59Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grimaldi C, Gaudio R, Calomino F, et al. Control of scour at bridge piers by a downstream bed sill. J Hydraulic Eng-Asce, 2009, 135: 13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh C P, Setia B, Verma D V S. Collar-sleeve combination as a scour protection device around a circular pier. In: Proc. 29th IAHR Congress. Beijing, Theme D. 2001, 202–209Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kumar V, Raju K G R, V ittal N. Reduction of local scour around bridge piers using slots and collars. J Hydraulic Eng-Asce, 1999, 125: 1302–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grimaldi C, Gaudio R, Calomino F, et al. Countermeasures against local scouring at bridge piers: Slot and combined system of slot and bed sill. J Hydraulic Eng-Asce, 2009, 135: 425–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moncada-M A T, Aguirre-Pe J, Bolivar J C, et al. Scour protection of circular bridge piers with collars and slots. J Hydraul Res, 2009 47: 119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Dey S. Evaluation of flow-altering countermeasures against bridge pier scour. J Hydraul Eng, 2012, 138: 297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    De Sonneville B, Rudolph D, Raaijmakers T C. Scour reduction by collars around offshore monopiles. In: Proceedings International Conference on Scour and Erosion (ICSE-5). American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010: 202–209Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Breusers H N C, Raudkivi A J. Scouring. Rotterdam NL: Balkema, 1991Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen Z C, Wang G Q, Zhan X L. Experimental study of settling velocity and incipient velocity of fine plastic particles (in Chinese). J Hydraul Eng, 1996, 2: 24–28Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dey S, Raikar R V. Characteristics of horseshoe vortex in developing scour holes at piers. J Hydraulic Eng-Asce, 2007 133: 399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pagliara S, Carnacina I, Cigni F. Sills and gabions as countermeasures at bridge pier in presence of debris accumulations. J Hydraul Res, 2010, 48: 764–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gaudio R, Tafarojnoruz A, Calomino F. Combined flow-altering countermeasures against bridge pier scour. J Hydraul Res, 2012, 50: 35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xu Y, Wang J J. Recent development of vortex ring impinging onto the wall. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 2447–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ma L Q, Feng L H. Experimental investigation on control of vortex shedding mode of a circular cylinder using synthetic jets placed at stagnation points. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 158–170MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Hydraulic EngineeringRoyal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations