Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 56, Issue 11, pp 2798–2807 | Cite as

Analysis of effects of front and back surface dopants on silicon vertical multi-junction solar cell by 2D numerical simulation

  • YuPeng XingEmail author
  • PeiDe Han
  • Shuai Wang
  • Peng Liang
  • ShiShu Lou
  • YuanBo Zhang
  • ShaoXu Hu
  • HuiShi Zhu
  • YanHong Mi
  • ChunHua Zhao


The silicon vertical multi-junction (VMJ) solar cell has a good potential in high concentration, but it requires high quality front and back surface passivation layers to keep its high efficiency. We try to add dopants into the front and back surfaces of the VMJ cell to release this strict requirement in this work. The effects of recombination velocities, doping types and doping profiles of front and back surfaces on the performance of the P-type VMJ cell were calculated under 1 sun and 1000 suns. The 2D numerical simulation tool TCAD software was used. The performance of the VMJ cell without front and back surface dopants was also calculated for comparison. It was found that the requirement of high quality front and back surface passivation layers could be released remarkably by adding either N-type or P+-type front and back surface dopants. For the two types of front surface dopants, the highest efficiencies of the cells were got by light dopant; for the two types of back surface dopants, the doping type and profile affected little on the performance of the cell in our calculation range. It was also found that the series resistance of the VMJ cell with N-type front surface dopant was decreased by the 2D effect of front surface emitter. The VMJ cell with P+-type front surface dopant had the highest efficiency under 1000 suns and the VMJ cell with N-type front surface dopant had the highest efficiency under 1 sun in our calculation range.


vertical junction concentration 2D numerical simulation doping profile 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gover A and Stella P. Vertical multijunction solar-cell one-dimensional analysis. Electron. Devices, IEEE Trans, 1974, 21(6): 351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rafat N H. A simple analytical treatment of edge-illuminated VMJ silicon solar cells. Sol. Energy, 2006, 80(12): 1588–1599Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xing Y P, Han P D, Fan Y J, et al. Optimization of the emitter region and the metal grid of a concentrator silicon solar cell. J. Semicond, 2013, 34(5): 054005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sater B L, Sater N D. High voltage silicon VMJ solar cells for up to 1000 suns intensities. IEEE 29th PV Spec Conf. 19–24, May, 2002, 1019-1022Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pozner R, Segev G, Sarfaty R, et al. Vertical junction Si cells for concentrating photovoltaics. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl, 2012, 20(2): 197–208Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braun A, Vossier A, Katz E A, et al. Multiple-bandgap vertical-junction architectures for ultra-efficient concentrator solar cells. Energy & Environ. Sci, 2012, 5(9): 8523–8527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Franklin E, Blakers A and Everett V. Sliver solar cells for concentrator PV systems with concentration ratio below 50. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl, 2009, 17(6): 403–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Catchpole K R, Blakers A W and Weber K J. Modelling a monolithically integrated vertical junction cell in low and high injection. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl, 2003, 11(2): 113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xing Y P, Han P D, Wang S, et al. Performance analysis of vertical multi-junction solar cell with front surface diffusion for high concentration. Sol. Energy, 2013, 94(0): 8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Armstrong G A, Maiti C K. TCAD for Si, SiGe and GaAs integrated circuits. London: The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2007. 31–40Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aberle A G, Heiser G and Green M A. Two-dimensional numerical optimization study of the rear contact geometry of high-efficiency silicon solar cells. J. Appl. Phys, 1994, 75(10): 5391–5405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Altermatt P. Models for numerical device simulations of crystalline silicon solar cells-a review. J.Comput. Electron, 2011, 10(3): 314–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Michael S and Bates A. The design and optimization of advanced multijunction solar cells using the Silvaco ATLAS software package. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2005, 87(1–4): 785–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liang Z C, Chen D M, Zhu Y B, et al. Study on the SiN x/Al rear reflectance performance of crystalline silicon solar cells. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53(12): 3209–3213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu L, Chen N F, Bai Y M, et al. Quantum efficiency and temperature coefficients of GaInP/GaAs dual-junction solar cell. Sci China Tech Sci, 2009, 52(5): 1176–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hermle M, Granek F, Schultz O, et al. Analyzing the effects of front-surface fields on back-junction silicon solar cells using the charge-collection probability and the reciprocity theorem. J. Appl. Phys, 2008, 103(5): 054507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Granek F, Hermle M, Huljić D M, et al. Enhanced lateral current transport via the front N+ diffused layer of n-type high-efficiency back-junction back-contact silicon solar cells. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl, 2009, 17(1): 47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cuevas A and Russell D A. Co-optimisation of the emitter region and the metal grid of silicon solar cells. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl, 2000, 8(6): 603–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Green M A. General solar cell curve factors including the effects of ideality factor, temperature and series resistance. Solid-State Electron, 1977, 20(3): 265–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Green M A. Solar cells: Operating Principles, Technology and System Applications. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 1982. 62–65Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pysch D, Mette A and Glunz S W. A review and comparison of different methods to determine the series resistance of solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2007, 91(18): 1698–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Altermatt P P, Heiser G, Aberle A G, et al. Spatially resolved analysis and minimization of resistive losses in high-efficiency Si solar cells. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl, 1996, 4(6): 399–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aberle A G, Wenham S R, Green M A, et al. Decreased emitter sheet resistivity loss in high-eficiency silicon solar cells. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl, 1994, 2(1): 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morales-Acevedo A. Lateral current effects on the voltage distribution in the emitter of solar cells under concentrated sunlight. Sol. Energy, 2009, 83(4): 456–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ai B, Zhang Y H, Deng Y J, et al. Study on device simulation and performance optimization of the epitaxial crystalline silicon thin film solar cell. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55(11): 3187–3199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Narasimha S, Rohatgi A and Weeber A W. An optimized rapid aluminum back surface field technique for silicon solar cells. Electron. Devices, IEEE Trans, 1999, 46(7): 1363–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • YuPeng Xing
    • 1
    Email author
  • PeiDe Han
    • 1
  • Shuai Wang
    • 1
  • Peng Liang
    • 1
  • ShiShu Lou
    • 1
  • YuanBo Zhang
    • 1
  • ShaoXu Hu
    • 1
  • HuiShi Zhu
    • 1
  • YanHong Mi
    • 1
  • ChunHua Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Lab on Integrated Optoelectronics, Institute of SemiconductorsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations