Organic photodetectors based on transparent electrodes for application in ultraviolet light detection
- 188 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
A high performance heterojunction organic ultraviolet photodetector based on NPB and Bphen has been fabricated. A transparent conducting polymer PEDOT:PSS coated quartz substrate instead of ITO coated glass substrate as anode is propitious to detect shorter wavelength ultraviolet light. As a result, the device shows a low dark current density, a high responsivity of 502 mA/W and a detectivity of 2.67×1012 cm Hz1/2/W which is illuminated by a 220 nm ultraviolet light with an intensity of 1.6 mW/cm2. Moreover, the performance of the PEDOT:PSS transparent electrode device is better than the semi-transparent Al electrode device electrode because of the higher transmittance and electrode properties.
Keywords
ultraviolet photodetector conducting polymer PEDOT: PSSPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Razeghi M, Rogalski A. Semiconductor ultraviolet detectors. J Appl Phys, 1996, 79: 7433–7473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Liao M, Koide Y, Alvarez J. Photovoltaic Schottky ultraviolet detectors fabricated on boron-doped homoepitaxial diamond layer. Appl Phys Lett, 2006, 88: 033504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dahal R, Tahtamouni T M, Fan Z, et al. Hybrid AlN-SiC deep ultraviolet Schottky barrier photodetectors. Appl Phys Lett, 2007, 90: 263505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Mazzeo G, Conte G, Reverchon J L, et al. Deep ultraviolet detection dynamics of AlGaN based devices. Appl Phys Lett, 2006, 89: 223513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Li J, Fan Z, Dahal R, et al. 200 nm deep ultraviolet photodetectors based on AlN. Appl Phys Lett, 2006, 89: 213510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Chen L, Li W, Wei H, et al. Organic ultraviolet photovoltaic diodes based on copper phthalocyanine as an electron acceptor. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2006, 90: 1788–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kong Z, Li W, Che G, et al. Highly sensitive organic ultraviolet optical sensor based on phosphorescent Cu (I) complex. Appl Phys Lett, 2006, 89: 161112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ray D, Narasimhan K L. High response organic visible-blind ultraviolet detector. Appl Phys Lett, 2007, 91: 093516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Han Y, Wu G, Wang M, et al. High efficient UV-A photodetectors based on monodispersed ligand-capped TiO2 nanocrystals and polyfluorene hybrids. Polymer, 2010, 51: 3736–3743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Han Y, Wu G, Li H, et al. Highly efficient ultraviolet photodetectors based on TiO2 nanocrystal-polymer composites via wet processing. Nanotechnology, 2010, 21: 185708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Li H, Wu G, Shi M, et al. Synthesis of solution processable ultraviolet sensitive organic molecules and their application in hybrid UV photodetector. Synthetic Metals, 2010, 160: 1648–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Li H, Wu G, Chen H, et al. Spectral response tuning and realization of quasi-solar-blind detection in organic ultraviolet photodetectors. Org Electron, 2011, 12: 70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Yan F, Liu H, Li W, et al. Double wavelength ultraviolet light sensitive organic photodetector. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 253308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wu S, Li W, Chu B, et al. High response deep ultraviolet organic photodetector with spectrum peak focused on 280 nm. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 093302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hau S K, Yip H L, Zou J, et al. Indium tin oxide-free semi-transparent inverted polymer solar cells using conducting polymer as both bottom and top electrodes. Org Electron, 2009, 10: 1401–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kim Y S, Oh S B, Park J H, et al. Highly conductive PEDOT/silicate hybrid anode for ITO-free polymer solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2010, 94: 471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Girtan M, Rusu M. Role of ITO and PEDOT:PSS in stability/degradation of polymer: Fullerene bulk heterojunctions solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2010, 94: 446–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kirchmeyer S, Reuter K. Scientific importance, properties and growing applications of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). J Mater Chem, 2005, 15: 2077–2088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kanaan H, Jolinat P, Ablart G, et al. Influence of poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) in polyfluorene based light-emitting diodes: Evidence of charge trapping at the organic interface. Org Electron, 2010, 11: 1047–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Schlaf R, Parkinson B A, Lee P A, et al. Photoemission spectroscopy of LiF coated Al and Pt electrodes. J Appl Phys 1998, 84: 6729–6736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Wang S, Fung M, Lai S, et al. Experimental study of a chemical reaction between LiF and Al. J Appl Phys 2003, 94: 169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kim J, Jung J, Lee D, et al. Enhancement of electrical conductivity of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(4-styrenesulfonate) by a change of solvents. Synthetic Metals, 2002, 126: 311–316MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ouyang J, Xu Q, Chu C, et al. On the mechanism of conductivity enhancement in poly(3,4-ethylenedioxy thiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) film through solvent treatment. Polymer, 2004, 45: 8443–8450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Dong Q, Zhou Y, Pei J, et al. All-spin-coating vacuum-free processed semi-transparent inverted polymer solar cells with PEDOT:PSS anode and PAH-D interfacial layer. Org Electron, 2010, 11: 1327–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sze S M. Physics of Semiconductor Devices. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2007Google Scholar