Scheme optimum selection for dynamic control of reservoir limited water level

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Dynamic control of reservoir limited water level is important to reservoir flood control operation. A reasonable limited water level can best utilize flood water resources in addition to flood control. This paper is a trial application of the fuzzy information entropy matter-element evaluation method (FIEMEM) as an optimal selection of dynamic control of limited water level. In this method, compound matter elements are established first, followed by establishment of an evaluation model and choice of the optimal scheme on the basis of fuzzy information entropy. In determining weights, a combined weighting method in game theory is adopted to combine experiential weights and mathematical weights so as to eliminate one-sidedness of the single weighting method. Finally, the feasibility of this optimization method is verified by citing dynamic control of Biliuhe reservoir limited water level as an example.

Keywords

fuzzy information entropy matter-element evaluation method (FIEMEM) reservoir limited water level dynamic control mathematical weight 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Li W, Guo S L, Liu P, et al. A reservoir dynamic flood limited water level control method based on real-time forecasting information (in Chinese). Water Power, 2006, 32(3): 8–12MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang B D, Zhou H C, Wang G L. Theory, Method and Application of Reservoir Dynamic Control of the Limit Water Level (in Chinese). Beijing: China Waterpower Press, 2006Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou H C, Zhang G H, Wang B D, et al. Study on adjusting the limited level of reservoires during flood season based on flood control forecast (in Chinese). Water Power, 2006, 32(5): 14–17Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xiao F C. Study for decision-making analysis of fuzzy information entropy matter-element (in Chinese). Petrol Plan & Eng, 1998, 9(1): 25–27Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li J, Huang K M, Zhao X. Entropy description of measured information in mathematical and physical inverse problems. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci, 2008, 51(7): 1031–1037MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Su H Z, Wen Z P, Hu J, et al. Evaluation model for service life of dam based on time-varying risk probability. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci, 2009, 52(7): 1966–1973MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou H C, Zhang G H, Wang G L. Multi-objective decision making approach based on entropy weights for reservoir flood control operation (in Chinese). J Water Res Eng, 2007, 38(1): 100–106Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang C K. Model and application of the water quality fuzzy assessment based on entropy (in Chinese). Sys Eng Theor Pract, 1998, 18(6): 80–85Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo J G, Xie J C, Ruan B Q. Fuzzy comprehensive assessment model for water shortage risk based on entropy weight (in Chinese). J Water Res Eng, 2008, 39(9): 1092–1097Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang Q, Peng S Z, Tian S G, et al. Application of fuzzy matter-element method to regional water security evaluation (in Chinese). J Hohai Univ (Nat Sci), 2007, 35(4): 379–383Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang H Y, Li Z Z, Chang X L. Entropy weight decision-making method and its application to hydropower engineering mark (in Chinese). Eng J Wuhan Univ, 2005, 38(2): 44–48Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen J L. Game theory-based evaluation method of the combination empowerment (in Chinese). Fujian Comp, 2003, 9: 15–16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qiu W H. Management Decision and Application of Entropy Theory (in Chinese). Beijing: Machinery Industry Press, 2002. 280–281Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of water Conservancy and Civil EngineeringShandong Agricultural UniversityTaianChina
  2. 2.Faculty of Infrastructure EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations