Advertisement

Crustal structure study based on principal component analysis of receiver functions

  • Jianyong Zhang
  • Ling ChenEmail author
  • Xu Wang
Research Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The receiver function (RF) technique is an effective method for studying crustal structure. For a single station, the average 1-D crustal structure is usually derived by stacking the radial RFs from all back-azimuths, whereas structural variations (such as dipping discontinuities or anisotropy) can be constrained through analysis of waveform dependence on the back-azimuth of both the radial and tangential RFs. However, it is often difficult to directly extract information about structural variations from the waveform of RF, due to the common presence of noise in real data. In this study, we proposed a new method to derive structural variation information for individual stations by applying principal component analysis (PCA) to RFs sorted by back-azimuth. In this method (termed as RF-PCA), a set of principal components (PCs), which are uncorrelated with each other and reflect different characteristics of the RF data, were extracted and utilized separately to reconstruct new RFs. Synthetic tests show that the first PC of the radial RFs contains the average structural information of the crust beneath the corresponding station, and the second PC of the radial RFs and the first PC of the tangential RFs both reflect the variations of the crustal structure. Our synthetic modeling results indicate that the new RF-PCA method is valid for a variety of synthetic models with intra-crustal dipping discontinuities and/or anisotropy. We applied this method to the real data from a broadband temporary seismic station (s233) in the central part of the Sichuan Basin. The results suggest that the RF data can be best explained by the presence of two nearly parallel dipping discontinuities within the crust. Combining with previous logging data, seismic exploration and deep sounding observations, we interpret the shallow dipping discontinuity as the top boundary of the Precambrian crystalline basement of the Sichuan Basin and the deep one corresponding to the Conrad interface between the upper and lower crust, consistent with the geological feature of the study area. In this work, both synthetic tests and real data application results demonstrate the effectiveness of the RF-PCA method for studying crustal structures.

Keywords

Principal component analysis Receiver function Crustal structure Dipping discontinuity Anisotropy Sichuan Basin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the participants of the Seismic Array Laboratory of IGGCAS for collecting the data (doi:  https://doi.org/10.12129/IGGSL. Data.Observation, https://doi.org/www.seislab.cn/). We thank Prof. Frederiksen and Prof. Bostock for providing the Raysum package and Prof. Qingju Wu for providing the time domain maximum entropy spectral deconvolution algorithm. We thank reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions, as well as the help of Yiming Bai, Zimu Wu, and Yujing Lai. This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41688103) and the independent project of the State Key Laboratory of the Lithospheric Evolution, IGGCAS (Grant No. SKL-Z201704-11712180).

Supplementary material

11430_2018_9341_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (270 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 228 KB.

References

  1. Bianchi I, Park J, Piana Agostinetti N, Levin V. 2010. Mapping seismic anisotropy using harmonic decomposition of receiver functions: An application to Northern Apennines, Italy. J Geophys Res, 115: B12317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen Y, Xu Y, Xu T, Si S, Liang X, Tian X, Deng Y, Chen L, Wang P, Xu Y, Lan H, Xiao F, Li W, Zhang X, Yuan X, Badal J, Teng J. 2015. Magmatic underplating and crustal growth in the Emeishan Large Igneous Province, SW China, revealed by a passive seismic experiment. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 432:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Y, Wang Z H, Guo X, Deng Y F, Xu T, Liang X F, Tian X B, Wu J, Chen L, Zhang X, Tang G C, Xu Y G. 2017. Geophysical signature of the ancient mantle plume activities: A case study of the Emeishan Large Igneous Province (in Chinese). Bull Mineral Petrol Geochem, 36:394–403Google Scholar
  4. Fan J, Zhu J S, Jiang X T, Wu P. 2015. Crustal structure of Sichuan from receiver functions (in Chinese). Earthquake, 35:65–76Google Scholar
  5. Fang L H, Wu J P. 2009. Effects of dipping boundaries and anisotropic media on receiver functions (in Chinese). Progr Geophys, 24:42–50Google Scholar
  6. Frederiksen A W, Bostock M G. 2000. Modelling teleseismic waves in dipping anisotropic structures. Geophys J Int, 141:401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frederiksen A W, Folsom H, Zandt G. 2003. Neighbourhood inversion of teleseismic Ps conversions for anisotropy and layer dip. Geophys J Int, 155:200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao R, Chen C, Wang H, Lu Z, Brown L, Dong S, Feng S, Li Q, Li W, Wen Z, Li F. 2016. SINOPROBE deep reflection profile reveals a Neo-Proterozoic subduction zone beneath Sichuan Basin. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 454:86–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutiérrez E, Zaldivar J M. 2000. The application of Karhunen-Loéve, or principal component analysis method, to study the non-linear seismic response of structures. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 29:1261–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagen D C. 1982. The application of principal components analysis to seismic data sets. Geoexploration, 20:93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones I F. 1985. Applications of the Karhunen-Loeve transform in reflection seismic processing. Doctoral Dissertation. University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones I F, Levy S. 1987. Signal-to-Noise ratio enhancement in multichannel seismic data via the Karhunen-Loéve transform. Geophys Prospect, 35:12–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pearson K. 1901. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. London Edinburgh Dublin Philos Mag J Sci, 2:559–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kennett B L N, Engdahl E R, Buland R. 1995. Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes. Geophys J Int, 122:108–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kong F, Wu J, Liu K H, Gao S S. 2016. Crustal anisotropy and ductile flow beneath the eastern Tibetan Plateau and adjacent areas. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 442:72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levin V, Park J. 1997a. P-SH conversions in a flat-layered medium with anisotropy of arbitrary orientation. Geophys J Int, 131:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levin V, Park J. 1997b. Crustal anisotropy in the Ural Mountains Foredeep from teleseismic receiver functions. Geophys Res Lett, 24:1283–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Licciardi A, Eken T, Taymaz T, Piana Agostinetti N, Yolsal-Çevikbilen S. 2018. Seismic anisotropy in central north Anatolian Fault Zone and its implications on crustal deformation. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 277:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu S S, Deng B, Sun W, Zhong Y, Li Z W, Li J X, Jiang L. 2018. Sichuan Basin: A superimposed sedimentary basin mainly controlled by its peripheric tectonics (in Chinese). Chin J Geol, 53:308–326Google Scholar
  20. Li J Y, Shi B W, Xu X Y, Hu J F. 2018. Crustal structure beneath the Sichuan basin and adjacent regions revealed by teleseismic receiver functions (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 61:2719–2735Google Scholar
  21. McNamara D E, Owens T J. 1993. Azimuthal shear wave velocity anisotropy in the Basin and Range Province using moho Ps converted phases. J Geophys Res, 98:12003–12017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mei Q H, He D F, Wen Z, Li Y Q, Li J. 2014. Geologic structure and tectonic evolution of Leshan-Longnvsi paleo-uplift in Sichuan Basin, China (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin, 35:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nagaya M, Oda H, Akazawa H, Ishise M. 2008. Receiver functions of seismic waves in layered anisotropic media: Application to the estimate of seismic anisotropy. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 98:2990–3006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Savage M K. 1998. Lower crustal anisotropy or dipping boundaries? Effects on receiver functions and a case study in New Zealand. J Geophys Res, 103:15069–15087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schulte-Pelkum V, Mahan K H. 2014. A method for mapping crustal deformation and anisotropy with receiver functions and first results from USArray. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 402:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sherrington H F, Zandt G, Frederiksen A. 2004. Crustal fabric in the Tibetan Plateau based on waveform inversions for seismic anisotropy parameters. J Geophys Res, 1009: B02312Google Scholar
  27. Song W H. 1996. Research on reservoir-formed conditions of large-medium gas fields of Leshan-Longnvsi palaeohigh (in Chinese). Nat Gas Indust, (s1): 13–26Google Scholar
  28. Shlens J. 2014. A tutorial on PC analysis User’s Guide Version 3.02Google Scholar
  29. Smith L I. 2002. A tutorial on PCs analysis. Technical Report. Department of Computer Science. University of OtagoGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang Q, Niu F, Gao Y, Chen Y. 2016a. Crustal structure and deformation beneath the NE margin of the Tibetan plateau constrained by teleseismic receiver function data. Geophys J Int, 204:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Q, Gao Y, Niu F L, Chen Y T. 2016b. Reliability analysis of crustal anisotropy from receiver functions and effect of dipping discontinuity (in Chinese). Earthquake, 36:14–25Google Scholar
  32. Wang X, Chen L, Ai Y, Xu T, Jiang M, Ling Y, Gao Y. 2018. Crustal structure and deformation beneath eastern and northeastern Tibet revealed by P-wave receiver functions. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 497:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu Q J, Tian X B, Zhang N L, Li W P, Zeng R S. 2003. Receiver function estimated by maximum entropy deconvolution (in Chinese). Acta Seismol Sin, 25:382–389Google Scholar
  34. Xie J, Ni S D, Zeng X F. 2012. 1D shear wave velocity structure of the shallow upper crust in central Sichuan Basin (in Chinese). Earthq Res Sichuan, (2): 20–24Google Scholar
  35. Xu T, Zhang Z J, Liu B F, Chen Y, Zhang M H, Tian X B, Xu Y G, Teng J W. 2015. Crustal velocity structure in the Emeishan large igneous province and evidence of the Permian mantle plume activity. Sci China Earth Sci, 58:1133–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu B X, Bai X B, Fu X Y. 2004. Mathematical Transformation and Estimation Methods in Signal Processing (in Chinese). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. 42Google Scholar
  37. Yang Y, Yao H, Zhang P, Chen L. 2018. Crustal azimuthal anisotropy in the trans-North China orogen and adjacent regions from receiver functions. Sci China Earth Sci, 61:903–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zheng R C, Li G H, Dai C C, Li N, Wang C Y. 2012. Basin-mountain coupling system and its sedimentary response in Sichuan analogous foreland basin (in Chinese). Acta Geol Sin, 86:170–180Google Scholar
  39. Zhu L, Kanamori H. 2000. Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions. J Geophys Res, 105:2969–2980CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and GeophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations