Science China Earth Sciences

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 557–567 | Cite as

Factors influencing the porosity of gas hydrate bearing sediments

  • Jing He
  • XueWei Liu
  • Zhen Yu
  • ChengLiang Xie
  • ZiWei Li
Research Paper

Abstract

Porosity is a key parameter in calculating the velocity of gas hydrate bearing sediments and quantifying the amount of gas hydrate. The variation of porosity is affected by many factors. The influences of different factors on porosity are distinct. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the main factors that affect the overall and local change of porosity in marine sediments where gas hydrate was sampled. Porosity logs were collected from ODP Leg 164, Blake Ridge, ODP Leg 204, Hydrate Ridge, and IODP expedition 311, Cascadia Margin. Based on the characteristic of porosity variation in depth, porosity was divided into three components: low frequency component, middle frequency component, and high frequency component. The factors influencing each component were discussed. From the analysis, we observed that the porosity of unconsolidated sediment was very high, and the decreasing trend of low frequency component versus depth was affected by compaction. In addition, the initial porosity and slope of low frequency component variation were affected by the content of fine grain and geothermal gradient respectively. The middle component could reflect the variation of lithology, which was affected by the content variation of different sized grains and gas hydrate. The high frequency component was affected by the frequent change of grain size. The existence of volcanic ash-rich sand caused a high value to the high frequency component. The results are applicable to porosity evaluation in gas hydrate bearing sediments.

Keywords

porosity gas hydrate three components of porosity unconsolidated sediment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Athy L F. Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bull, 1930, 14: 1–24Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rogers J J, Head W B. Relationships between porosity, median size, and sorting coefficients of synthetic sands. J Sediment Petrol, 1961, 31: 467–470Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scherer M. Parameters influencing porosity in sandstones: A model for sandstone porosity prediction. AAPG Bull, 1987, 71: 485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Z, Shao X J, Jin B, et al. Co-effect of depth and burial time on the evolution of porosity for classic rocks during the stage of compaction (in Chinese). Geoscience, 2007, 21: 125–132Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gipson M. A study of the relations of depth, porosity and clay mineral orientation in Pennsylvanian shales. J Sediment Petrol, 1966, 36: 888–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dzevanshir R D, Buryakovskiy L A, Chilingarian G V. Simple quantitative evaluation of porosity of argillaceous sediments at various depths of burial. Sediment Geol, 1986, 46: 169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meade R H. Factors influencing the early stages of compaction of clays and sands-Review. J Sediment Petrol, 1966, 36: 1085–1101Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Selley R C. Porosity gradients in North Sea oil-bearing sandstones. J Geol Soc Lond, 1978, 135: 119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magara K. Comparison of porosity-depth relationships of shale and sandstone. J Pet Geol, 1980, 3: 175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramm M. Porosity-depth trends in reservoir sandstones: Theoretical models related to Jurassic sandstones offshore Norway. Mar Pet Geol, 1992, 9: 553–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramm M, Bjorlykke K. Porosity/depth trends in reservoir sandstones: Assessing the quantitative effects of varying pore-pressure, temperature history and mineralogy, Norwegian Shelf data. Clay Min, 1994, 29: 475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dutta T, Mavko G, Mukerji T, et al. Compaction trends for shale and clean sandstone in shallow sediments, Gulf of Mexico. The Leading Edge, 2009, 5: 590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sloan E D. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1998Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helgerud M B, Dvorkin J, Nur A, et al. Elastic-wave velocity in marine sediments with gas hydrates: Effective medium modeling. Geophys Res Lett, 1999, 26: 2021–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dai J C, Xu H B, Snyder F, et al. Detection and estimation of gas hydrates using rock physics and seismic inversion: Examples from the northern deepwater Gulf of Mexico. The Leading Edge, 2004, 1: 60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghosh R, Sain K, Ojha M. Estimating the amount of gas-hydrate using effective medium theory: A case study in the Blake Ridge. Mar Geophys Res, 2010, 31: 29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paull C K, Matsumoto R, Wallace P J, et al. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports, Vol. 164, 1996Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trehu A M, Bohrmann G, Rack F R, et al. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports, Vol. 204, 2003Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Riedel M, Collett T S, Malone M J, et al. Proceedings of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program. Vol. 311, 2005Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bassiouni Z. Theory, measurement, and interpretation of well logs. Soc Petrol Eng, 1994Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Archie G E. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. AIME, 1942, 146: 54–62Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rubey W, Hubbert M K. Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting, II. Geol Soc Am Bull, 1959, 70: 167–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamilton E L. Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments, North pacific. J Geophys Res, 1970, 75: 4423–4446CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing He
    • 1
  • XueWei Liu
    • 1
  • Zhen Yu
    • 1
  • ChengLiang Xie
    • 1
  • ZiWei Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geophysics and Information TechnologyChina University of Geosciences (Beijing)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations