Science China Earth Sciences

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 711–719 | Cite as

Modeling tree root diameter and biomass by ground-penetrating radar

  • XiHong Cui
  • Jin Chen
  • JinSong Shen
  • Xin Cao
  • XueHong Chen
  • XiaoLin Zhu
Research Paper

Abstract

Roots play a key role in ecosystem functioning as they transfer water and nutrients from soil to plants. Traditional methods for measuring roots are labor-intensive and destructive in nature, which limits quantitative and repeatable assessments in long-term research. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) provides a non-destructive method to measure plant roots. Based on the superiority of GPR with 2 GHz frequency, we developed a new, practical method to estimate root biomass. First, average root matter density was measured by collecting a small number of root samples. Second, under controlled, experimental conditions in a sandy area, a root diameter estimation model base on GPR was developed from which root diameter was estimated. Third, root volume was calculated using the estimated root diameter and assuming the shape of roots to be cylindrical. Finally, root biomass was estimated by averaging root matter density and root volume. Results of this study suggest the following: (1) the density of coarse roots with diameters greater than 0.5 cm is relatively uniform; (2) a new wave shape parameter, ΔT, extracted from profile data of 2 GHz frequency antenna is independent of root depth, thus enabling the construction of a root diameter estimation model with high accuracy; and (3) results of a field experiment demonstrated the GPR-based method to be feasible and effective in estimating biomass of coarse roots. These findings are helpful for improving GPR-based root diameter and biomass estimation models and suggest the potential of GPR data in studying root systems.

Keywords

ground-penetrating radar tree root system root biomass root diameter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Weisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U. Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Press, 2002. 15–32Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dixon R K, Brown S, Houghton R A, et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 1994, 263: 185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jackson R B, Canadell J, Ehleringer J R, et al. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomass. Oecologia, 1996, 108: 389–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gregory P J, Hutchison D J, Read D B, et al. Non-invasive imaging of roots with high-resolution X-ray micro-tomography. Plant Soil, 2003, 187: 221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stover D B, Day F P, Butnor J R, et al. Effect of elevated CO2 on coarse-root biomass in Florida scrub detected by ground-penetrating radar. Ecology, 2007, 88: 1328–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mulkey S S, Chazdon R L, Smith A P, et al. Tropical Forest Plant Ecophysiology. New York: Chapman and Hall Press, 1996. 268–300Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brunner I, Godbold D L. Tree roots in a changing world. J For Res, 2007, 12: 78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Persson H. Spatial distribution of fine root growth, mortality and decomposition in a young scots pine stand in central Sweden. Oikos, 1980, 34: 77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norby R J, Jackson R B. Root dynamics and global change: Seeking an ecosystem perspective. New Phytol, 2000, 147: 3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pierret A, Moran C J, Doussan C. Conventional detection methodology is limiting our ability to understand the roles and functions of fine roots. New Phytol, 2005, 166: 967–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nadezhdina N, Cermak J. Instrumental methods for studies of structure and function of root systems of large trees. J Exp Bot, 2003, 54: 1511–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sustek S, Hruska J, Druckmuller M, et al. Root surfaces in the large oak tree estimated by image analysis of the map obtained by the ground penetrating radar. J For Sci, 1999, 45: 139–143Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amato M, Basso B, Celano G, et al. In situ detection of tree root distribution and biomass by multi-electrode resistivity imaging. Tree Physiol, 2008, 28: 1441–1448Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Danjon F, Reubens B. Assessing and analyzing 3D architecture of woody root systems, a review of methods and applications in tree and soil stability, resource acquisition and allocation. Plant Soil, 2008, 303: 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hruska J, èermák J, Sustek S. Mapping tree root systems with ground-penetrating radar. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19: 125–130Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stokes A, Fourcaud T, Hruska J, et al. An evaluation of different methods to investigate root system architecture of urban trees in situ: 1. Ground penetrating radar. Arboriculture J, 2002, 28: 2–9Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cermak J, Hruska J, Martinkova M, et al. Urban tree root systems and their survival near houses analyzed using ground penetrating radar and sap flow techniques. Plant Soil, 2000, 219: 103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wielopolski L, Hendrey G, McGuigan M. Imaging tree root systems in situ. The 8th International Conference on Ground-Penetrating Radar, May 23 to 26, 2000, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. 642–646Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Butnor J R, Doolittle J A, Kress L, et al. Use of ground-penetrating radar to study tree roots in the southeastern United States. Tree Physiol, 2001, 21: 1269–1278Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barton C V M, Montagu K D. Detection and determination of root diameter by ground-penetrating radar under optimal conditions. Tree Physiol, 2004, 24: 1323–1331Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Butnor J R, Doolittle J A, Johnsen K H, et al. Utility of ground-penetrating radar as a root biomass survey tool in forest systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2003, 67: 1607–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Butnor J R, Johnsen K H. Feasibility of using ground-penetrating radar to quantify root mass in Florida’s intensively managed pine plantations. Forest Biology Research Cooperative Report Number 38. Gainesville, Florida, USA, 2005Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stover D B, Day F P, Butnor J R, et al. Effect of elevated CO2 on coarse-root biomass in Florida scrub detected by ground-penetrating radar. Ecology, 2007, 88: 1328–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hirano Y, Dannoura M, Aono K, et al. Limiting factors in the detection of tree roots using ground-penetrating radar. Plant Soil, 2009, 319: 15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cui X H, Chen J, Guan L L. The application of ground penetrating radar to plant root system detection (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 2009, 24: 606–611Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mu Y G, Chen X H, Liu Y. Seismic Data Processing (in Chinese). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2007. 130–135Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hampson D, Russell B. First-break interpretation using generalized linear inversion. J Can Soc Exp Geophys, 1984, 20: 40–50Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boschetti F, Dentith M D, List R D. A fractal-based algorithm for detecting first arrivals on seismic traces. Geophysics, 1996, 61: 1095–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xiang J M, Zhang M Y. Radar System (in Chinese). Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology Press, 1997. 30–32Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang X D. Linear Algebra in Digital Signal Processing (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 1997. 56–60Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mulder W A, Kroode A P E. Automatic velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization. Geophysics, 2002, 67: 1184–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    MacKay S, Abma R. Imaging and velocity analysis with depth-focusing analysis. Geophysics, 1992, 57: 1608–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Daniels D J. Surface-Penetrating Radar. London: The Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1996. 300Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Daniels D J. Ground Penetrating Radar. 2nd ed. London: Institution of Electrical Engineers, 2004. 300Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gazdag J, Sguazzero P. Migration of seismic data. Proc IEEE, 1984, 72: 1302–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xiong Z. The Application of Digital Signal Processing Technology in Seismic Data (in Chinese). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1993. 45-50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • XiHong Cui
    • 1
  • Jin Chen
    • 1
  • JinSong Shen
    • 2
  • Xin Cao
    • 1
  • XueHong Chen
    • 1
  • XiaoLin Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource EcologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and ProspectingChina University of PetroleumBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations