Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences

, Volume 52, Issue 5, pp 669–680 | Cite as

Patterns of shrub species richness and abundance in relation to environmental factors on the Alxa Plateau: Prerequisites for conserving shrub diversity in extreme arid desert regions

  • XinRong Li
  • HuiJuan Tan
  • MingZhu He
  • XinPing Wang
  • XiaoJun Li


Shrub species are considered the dominant plants in arid desert ecosystems, unlike in semiarid steppe zones or in grassland ecosystems. On the Alxa Plateau, northern China, sparse vegetation with cover ranging from 15% to 30% is characterized mainly by multifarious shrubs because herbaceous species are strongly restricted by the extreme drought climate, wind erosion, overgrazing and sand burial. Patterns in shrub species richness and species abundance in relation to environmental conditions were examined by DCA (detrended correspondence analysis) and interpreted by a biplot. The relationships between species diversity and environmental factors were examined using regression analyses. Our results show that the distributions of the shrub species in response to environmental conditions can be grouped into four ecological types, corresponding with the biological traits of the shrubs and their responses to the gradients of soil texture and soil water content. Patterns in species richness and species abundance were mainly determined by the deeper soil water content, instead of the soil texture as hypothesized by numerous studies in semiarid grasslands. With exception of the deeper soil water content, soil organic matter and total N content were positively correlated with species abundance, while pH was negatively correlated with it. These findings imply that it is vital for current shrub diversity conservation to reduce agricultural water use in the middle reaches of the Heihe River, which supplies water for the lower reaches in the western parts of the plateau, and to reduce the amount of groundwater exploitation and urban and oasis water use, to increase the water supply from Helan Mountain to the eastern desert of the Alxa Plateau.


biodiversity conservation shrub species richness abundance Alxa Plateau desert ecosystems 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Polis G A. Desert communities: An overview of patterns and processes. In: Polis G A, ed. The Ecology of Desert Communities. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1991Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Naeem S, Thompson L J, Lawler S P, et al. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature, 1994, 368: 734–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huston M A. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: Evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia, 1997, 110: 449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whitford W G. Ecology of Desert Ecosystems. New York: Academic Press, 2002Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shachak M, Lovett G M. Atmospheric deposition to a desert ecosystem and its implications for management. Ecol App, 1998, l8: 455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    MacMahon J A, Wagner F H. The Mojave, Sonoran and Chihuahuan Deserts of North America. In: Evanari M, Noy-Meir I, Goodall D W eds. Hot Deserts and Arid Shrublands: Ecosystems of the World. New York: Elsevier New York, 1985Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ludwig J A, Reynolds J F. Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tielborger K, Kadmon R. Relationships between shrubs and annual communities in a sandy desert ecosystem: A three-year study. Plant Ecol, 1997, 130: 191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li X R, Zhang Z S, Zhang J G, et al. Association between vegetation patterns and soil properties in the Southeastern Tengger Desert, China. Arid Land Res Manag, 2004, 18: 369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nunez-Olivera E, Martinez-Abaigar J, Escuderdero J C, et al. Comparative study of Cistus ladanifer shrublands in Extremadura (CW Spain) on the basis of woody species composition and cover. Vegetatio, 1995, 117: 123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noy-Meir I. Desert ecosystems: Environment and producers. Annual Rev Ecol System, 1973, 4: 25–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garner W, Steinberger Y. A proposed mechanism for the formation of “fertile islands” in the desert ecosystem. J Arid Environ, 1989, 16: 257–262Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sala O E, Lauenroth W K, Golluscio R A. Plant functional types in temperate semiarid regions. In: Smith T M, Shugart H H, Woodward F I, eds. Plant Functional Types. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schlesinger W H. Raikes J A, Hartley A E, et al. On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology, 1996, 77: 364–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dodd M B, Lauenroth W K, Burke I C, et al. Association between vegetation patterns and soil texture in the shortgrass steppe. Plant Ecol, 2002, 158: 127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holzapfel C, Tielborger K, Parag H A, et al. Annual plant-shrub in teractions along an aridity gradient. Basic Appl Ecol, 2006, 7: 268–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams M, Shimabukuro Y E, Herbert D A, et al. Heterogeneity of soils and vegetation in an Eastern Amazonian rain forest: Implications for scaling up biomass and production. Ecosystems, 2002, 5: 692–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lundholm J T, Larson D W. Relationships between spatial environmental heterogeneity and plant species diversity on a limestone pavement. Ecography, 2003, 26: 715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar S, Stohlgren T J, Chong G W. Spatial heterogeneity influences native and nonnative plant species richness. Ecology, 2006, 87: 3186–3199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pickett S T A, Cadenasso M L. Landscape ecology: Spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science, 1995, 269: 331–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kie J G. Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: Effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecology, 2002, 83: 530–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boeken B, Lipchin C, Gutterman Y. Annual plant community responses to density of small-scale soil disturbances in the Negev Desert of Israel. Oecologia, 1998, 114: 106–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oztas T, Koc A, Comakli B. Changes in vegetation and soil properties along a slope on overgrazed and eroded rangelands. J Arid Environ, 2003, 55: 93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pausas J G. Species richness patterns in the understorey of Pyrenean Pinus syvestris forest. J Vege Sci, 1994, 5: 517–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Austin M P, Pausa J G, Nicholls A O. Patterns of tree species richness in relation to environment in south-eastern New South Wales. Aus J Ecol, 1996, 21: 154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huston M A. Biodiversity: The Coexistence of Species in Changing Landscapes. Cambridge Cambridge: University Press, 1994Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pausas J G, Austin M P. Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal. J Veg Sci, 2001, 12: 153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tilman D. Resource Competation and Community Strcture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sternberg M, Gutman M, Perevolotsky A, et al. Vegetation response to grazing management in a Mediterranean herbaceous community: A functional group approach. J Appl Ecol, 2000, 37: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Higgins S I, Bond W J, Trollope S W. Fire, resprouting and variability: A recipe for grass-tree coexistence in savanna. J Ecol, 2000, 88: 213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Henkin Z, Sternberg M, Seligman No’am G, et al. Species richness in relation to phosphorus and competition in a Mediterranean dwarf-shrub community. Agr Ecosys Environ, 2006, 113: 277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Inouye R S. Population biology of desert annual plants. In: Polis G A, ed. The Ecology of Desert Communities. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1991Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ludwig J A, Gunningham G L, Whitson P D. Distribution of annual plants in North American deserts. J Arid Environ, 1998, 15: 221–227Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang X S, Principles and optimal model for development of Maowusu sandy grassland (in Chinese). Acta Phytoecol Sin, 1994, 18: 1–16Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li X R. Study on shrub community diversity of Ordos Plateau, Inner Mongolia, Northern China. J Arid Environ, 2001, 47: 271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Integrative Investigation Team for Vegetation of Inner Mongolia, CAS. Vegetation of Inner Mongolia (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 1985Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhu Z D, Chen G Q. Sandy Desertification in China (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 1994Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lu Q, Li X R, Xiao H L. The Observation Methods for Desert Ecosystems (in Chinese). Beijing: Chinese Environmental Science Press, 2004Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Loveland P J, Walley W R. Particle size analysis. In: Simth K A, Mullins C E, eds. Soil and Environmental Analysis, Physical Methods. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 2001Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Knudsen D, Peterson G A, Pratt P F. Lithium, sodium and potassium. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R, eds. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and MicrobiologicaI Properties. 2nd ed. Madison WI: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, 1982Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Olsen S R, Sommers L E. Phosphorus. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R, eds. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and MicrobiologicaI Properties. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, 1982Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hill M O, Smilauer P. TWINSPAN for Windows version 2.3. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology & University of South Bohemia, Huntingdon & Ceske Budejovice, 2005Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    ter Braak C J F, Smilauer P. Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca N Y USA. 2002Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gitay H, Nobe I R. What are functional types and how should we seek them? In: Smith T M, Shugart H H, Woodward F I, eds. Plant Functional Types: Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Díaz S, Cabido M. Vive la difference: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol, 2001, 16: 646–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hardtle W, Redecker B, Assmann T, et al. Vegetation responses to environmental conditions in floodplain grasslands: Prerequisites for preserving plant species diversity. Basic Appl Eco, 2006, 7: 280.288Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu W N. The Classification of Agro-meteorological Resource in the Left Banner of Alxa league (in Chinese). Huhehott: Huhehott People’s Publishing House of Inner Mongolia, 1994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • XinRong Li
    • 1
  • HuiJuan Tan
    • 1
  • MingZhu He
    • 1
  • XinPing Wang
    • 1
  • XiaoJun Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Shapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research InstituteChinese Academy of SciencesLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations