A decade of Bt cotton in Chinese fields: Assessing the direct effects and indirect externalities of Bt cotton adoption in China
- 120 Downloads
The objective of this study is to examine whether or not the gains from reduced spraying for bollworms are being sustained more than one decade after the initial adoption in 2007. Based on farm-level data collected by the authors in 1999–2007 in 16 villages from 4 provinces, this study shows that insecticides applied for controlling bollworms have declined. This analysis supports Chinese policy makers’ decision to not require refuges of non-Bt cotton fields. It also suggests that past studies may have underestimated the benefits from adopting Bt technology.
Keywordsbiotechnology Bt cotton insecticide sustainability externalities China
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.James C. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM Crops: 2007. ISAAA Briefs No. 37, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY. 2007Google Scholar
- 3.Traxler G, Godoy-Avila S, Falck-Zepeda J, et al. Transgenic Cotton in Mexico: Economic and Environmental Impacts (unpublished report). Auburn: Auburn University, 2001Google Scholar
- 4.Ismael Y, Thirtle C L B, Bennett R, et al. Smallholder adoption and economic impacts of Bt cotton in the Makhathini Flats, Republic of South Africa. Report for DFID Project R7946. London: Natural Resources Policy Research Programme, 2001Google Scholar
- 14.Wang S H, Just D, Andersen P. Tarnishing Silver Bullets: Bt Technology Adoption, Bounded Rationality and the Outbreak of Secondary Pest Infestations in China, Applied Economics and Management Department. Cornell Universit, 2005Google Scholar
- 16.Moar W J, Smith R H. Bt resistance monitoring of tobacco budworm and cotton bollworm in Alabama cotton. In: Let’s Get Everyone Involved. Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Diego, 1998. 1054–1056Google Scholar
- 17.Wang Z J, Lin H, Huang J K, et al. Bt cotton in China: Are secondary insect infestations offsetting the benefits in farmer fields. Agr Sci China, 2009, 8: 101–105, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmtVykur4%3DGoogle Scholar
- 18.The United States Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel, Subpanel on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) plant-pesticides and resistance management February 9–10, 1998. Docket No. OPPTS-00231Google Scholar
- 19.Fitt G P. Transgenic cotton resistance strategy. Australian Cottongrower. 1996, 17: 30–31Google Scholar
- 23.Xue D Y. A summary of Research on the Environmental Impacts of Bt cotton in China. Hong Kong: Green Peace, 2002Google Scholar