Science China Life Sciences

, Volume 53, Issue 7, pp 784–797 | Cite as

Changes in the distribution of South Korean forest vegetation simulated using thermal gradient indices

  • Sungho Choi
  • Woo-Kyun Lee
  • Yowhan Son
  • Seongjin Yoo
  • Jong-Hwan Lim


To predict changes in South Korean vegetation distribution, the Warmth Index (WI) and the Minimum Temperature of the Coldest Month Index (MTCI) were used. Historical climate data of the past 30 years, from 1971 to 2000, was obtained from the Korea Meteorological Administration. The Fifth-Generation National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) /Penn State Mesoscale Model (MM5) was used as a source for future climatic data under the A1B scenario from the Special Report on Emission Scenario (SRES) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). To simulate future vegetation distribution due to climate change, the optimal habitat ranges of Korean tree species were delimited by the thermal gradient indices, such as WI and MTCI. To categorize the Thermal Analogy Groups (TAGs) for the tree species, the WI and MTCI were orthogonally plotted on a two-dimensional grid map. The TAGs were then designated by the analogue composition of tree species belonging to the optimal WI and MTCI ranges. As a result of the clustering process, 22 TAGs were generated to explain the forest vegetation distribution in Korea. The primary change in distribution for these TAGs will likely be in the shrinkage of areas for the TAGs related to Pinus densiflora and P. koraiensis, and in the expansion of the other TAG areas, mainly occupied by evergreen broad-leaved trees, such as Camellia japonica, Cyclobalanopsis glauca, and Schima superba. Using the TAGs to explain the effects of climate change on vegetation distribution on a more regional scale resulted in greater detail than previously used global or continental scale vegetation models.


climate change forest distribution warmth index minimum temperature thermal analogy group 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    IPCC. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al. eds. Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007a. 1032Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    IPCC. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Parry M L, Canziani O F, Palutikof J P, et al. eds. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007b. 976Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arris L L, Eagleson P S. Evidence of a physiological basis for the boreal-deciduous forest ecotone in North America. Vegetatio, 1989, 82: 55–58, 10.1007/BF00217982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ohsawa M. Latitudinal pattern of mountain vegetation zonation in southern and eastern Asia. J Veg Sci, 1993, 4: 13–18, 10.2307/3235728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsui T, Yagihashi T, Nakaya T, et al. Climate controls on distribution of Fagus crenata forests in Japan. J Veg Sci, 2004a, 15: 57–66Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsui T, Yagihashi T, Nakaya T. Probability distributions, vulnerability and sensitivity in Fagus crenata forests following predicted climate changes in Japan. J Veg Sci, 2004b, 15: 605–614Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laurent J M, Bar-Hen A, Francois L, et al. Refining vegetation simulation models: From plant functional types to bioclimatic affinity groups of plants. J Veg Sci, 2004, 15: 739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horikawa M, Tsuyama I, Matsui T, et al. Assessing the potential impacts of climate change on the alpine habitat suitability of Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila). Land Ecol, 2009, 24: 115–128, 10.1007/s10980-008-9289-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prentice I C, Cramer W, Harrison S P, et al. A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. J Biogeo, 1992, 19: 117–134, 10.2307/2845499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lenihan J M, Neilson R P. A rule-based vegetation formation model for Canada. J Biogeo, 1993, 20: 615–628, 10.2307/2845518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brzeziecki B, Kienast F, Wildi O. Modeling potential impacts of climate change on the spatial distribution of zonal forest communities in Switzerland. J Veg Sci, 1995, 6: 257–268, 10.2307/3236221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bachelet D, Lenihan J M, Daly C, et al. MC1: a dynamic vegetation model for estimating the distribution of vegetation and associated carbon, nutrients, and water. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Technical documentation, version 1.0, 2001Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cao M K, Woodward F I. Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nature, 1998, 393: 249–252, 10.1038/30460, 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXjtlylsb4%3DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osborne C P, Mitchell P L, Sheehy J E, et al. Modeling the recent historical impacts of atmospheric CO2 and climate change on Mediterranean vegetation. Global Change Biol, 2000, 6: 445–458, 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00336.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Watanabe T, Yokozawa M, Emori S, et al. Developing a multilayered integrated numerical model of surface physics-growing plants interaction (MINoSGI). Global Change Biol, 2004, 10: 963–982, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00768.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lenihan J M, Drapek R, Bachelet D, et al. Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in California. Ecol Appli, 2003, 13: 1667–1681, 10.1890/025295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lenihan J M, Bachelet D, Neilson R P, et al. Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California. Climatic Change, 2008, 87: S215–S230, 10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXitlWgsr0%3DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu L, Cao M K, Li K. Climate-induced changes in the vegetation pattern of China in the 21st century. Ecol Res, 2006, 21: 912–919, 10.1007/s11284-006-0042-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim S N, Lee W K, Son Y. Applicability of climate change impact assessment models to Korean forest (in Korean with English Abstract). J Korean For Soc, 2009, 98: 33–48Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim J U, Lee D K. A Study on the vulnerability assessment of forest vegetation using regional climate model. J Korean Environ Res Rev Technol, 2006, 9: 32–40 (in Korean with English Abstract)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee M A, Lee W K, Son Y. Sensitivity and adaptability of vegetation and soil carbon storage to climate change with CEVSA model in Korea. Proceedings of A3 Foresight Program, Seoul, Korea. 2007a, 24Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Choi S, Lee W K, Kwak H B. Predicting the vegetation distribution and terrestrial carbon-fluxes using MC1 model. Proceedings of ESRI International User Conference 2009, San-Diego, USA, 2009a. [2009-07-14].
  23. 23.
    Choi S, Lee W K. Simulating Vegetation Responses and Carbon Fluxes to Climate Change using MC1 Model, Proceeding of IUFRO Conference-International Conference on Multipurpose Forest Management-Strategies for Sustainability in a Climate Change Era. Niigata, Japan, 2009b, 40Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riera J L, Magnuson J J, Vande Castle J R, et al. Analysis of large-scale spatial heterogeneity in vegetation indices among North American Landscapes. Ecosystems, 1998, 1: 268–282, 10.1007/s100219900021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mather J R, Yoshioka G A. The role of climate in the distribution of vegetation, An assoc amer geog, 1968, 58: 29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Woodward F I. Climate and Plant Distribution-Chapter 5: Climate and the Distribution of Taxa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 117–160Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Woodward F I, Lomas M R, Kelly C K. Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes. Philos Trans R Soc London [Biol], 2004, 359: 1465–1476, 10.1098/rstb.2004.1525, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crkvVKrtA%3D%3DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Looman J. Distribution of plant species and vegetation types in relation to climate. Vegetation, 1983, 54: 17–25, 10.1007/BF00036076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang X, Friedl M A, Schaaf C B, et al. Climate controls on vegetation phonological patterns in northern mid- and high latitudes inferred from MODIS data. Glob Change Biol, 2004, 10: 1133–1145, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00784.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jolly W M, Nemani R, Running S W. A generalized, bioclimatic index to predict foliar phenology in response to climate. Glob Change Biol, 2005, 11: 619–632, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00930.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang Z H, Brown J H, Tang Z, et al. Temperature dependence, spatial scale, and tree species diversity in eastern Asia and North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106: 13388–13392, 10.1073/pnas.0905030106, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVOitr3N, 19628692PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim J J, Hong S G, Yoon J K. Effect of minimum night temperature on growth of seedlings of Pinus densiflora and Betula platyphylla in container culture during winter season. J Bio-Environ Control, 2002, 11: 163–167Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sakai A. Freezing tolerance of evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved trees in Japan with reference to tree regions. Low Temp Sci-Ser B: Biol Sci, 1978, 36: 1–19Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sakai A, Paton D M, Wardle P. Freezing resistance of temperate and sub-arctic conifers native to the southern hemisphere. Low Temp Sci-Ser B: Biol Sci, 1979, 37: 107–111Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yim Y J. Distribution of forest vegetation and climate in the Korean peninsula III. Distribution of tree species along the thermal gradient. Jpn J Ecol, 1977a, 27: 177–189Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yim Y J. Distribution of forest vegetation and climate in the Korean peninsula IV. Distribution of tree species along the thermal gradient. Jpn J Ecol, 1977b, 27: 269–278Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fang J Y, Yoda K. Climate and vegetation in China (II) Distribution of main vegetation types and thermal climate. Ecol Res, 1989, 4: 71–83, 10.1007/BF02346944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fang J Y, Yoda K. Climate and vegetation in China (III) Distribution of main vegetation types and thermal climate. Ecol Res, 1990a, 5: 9–23, 10.1007/BF02348460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fang J Y, Yoda K. Climate and vegetation in China (IV) Distribution of main vegetation types and thermal climate. Ecol Res, 1990b, 5: 291–302, 10.1007/BF02347005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yang K C, Shim J K. Distribution of major plant communities based on the climatic conditions and topographic features in South Korea (in Korean with English Abstract). Korean J Environ Biol, 2007, 25: 168–177Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Strimbeck G R, Kjellsen T D, Schaberg P G, et al. Cold in the common garden: comparative low-temperature tolerance of boreal and temperate conifer foliage. Trees, 2007, 21: 557–567, 10.1007/s00468-007-0151-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    National Geographic Information Institute. The National Atlas of Korea 2007, [2007-12-01]
  43. 43.
    Korea Forest Service. Statistical yearbook of forestry, 2008. Korea Forest Service, Seoul, 2009, Chapter II, 30–32Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lee C S, Lee W K, Yoon J H, et al. Distribution pattern of Pinus densiflora and Quercus spp. stand in Korea using spatial statistics and GIS. J Korea For Soc, 2006, 95: 663–671Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lee M A, Lee W K, Song C C. Spatio-temporal change prediction and variability of temperature and precipitation (in Korean with English Abstract). J GIS Assoc Korea, 2007b, 15: 1–12Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Min S K, Legutke S, Hense A, et al. East Asian climate change in the 21st century as simulated by the coupled climate model ECHO-G under IPCC SRES scenarios. J Meteor Soc Japan, 2006, 82: 1187–1211, 10.2151/jmsj.2004.1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cha Y M, Lee H S, Moon J Y. Future climate projection over East Asia using ECHO-G/S (in Korean with English Abstract). Atmosphere, 2007, 17: 55–68Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kira T. A new classification of climate in eastern Asia as the basis for agricultural geography. Horticultural Institute. Kyoto Univ, Kyoto, 1945Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Neilson R P. A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecol Appl, 1995, 5: 362–385, 10.2307/1942028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Largerloef G S. Empirical orthogonal function analysis of advanced very high resolution radiometer surface temperature patterns in Santa Barbara Channel. J Geophys Res, 1988, 93: 6863–6873, 10.1029/JC093iC06p06863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weare B C, Nasstrom J S. Examples of extended empirical orthogonal function analysis. Mon Weather Rev, 1982, 110: 481–485, 10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<0481:EOEEOF>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sparnocchia S, Pinardi N, Demirov E. Multivariate empirical orthogonal function analysis of the upper thermocline structure of the Mediterranean Sea from observations and model simulations. Ann Geophys, 2003, 21: 167–187, 10.5194/angeo-21-167-2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tadesse T, Wardlow B D, Ryu J H. Identifying time-lag relationships between vegetation condition and climate to produce vegetation outlook maps and monitor drought. Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Hydrology-Session 6: Drought Assessment and Prediction, Part II, 2008. [2008-01-22].
  54. 54.
    Timmermann A. Detecting the nonstationary response of ENSO to greenhouse warming. J Atmos Sci, 1999, 56: 2313–2325, 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2313:DTNROE>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jensen J R. Introductory Digital Image Processing-A Remote Sensing Perspective, 3rd edition, Chapter 8: Image Enhancement. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004. 255–256Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Iverson L R, Prasad A M. Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States. Ecol Monogr, 1998, 68: 465–485, 10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0465:PAOTSF]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Takyu M, Kubota Y, Aiba S, et al. Patterns of changes in species diversity, structure and dynamics of forest ecosystems along latitudinal gradients in East Asia. Ecol Res, 2005, 20: 287–296, 10.1007/s11284-005-0044-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chung C H. Vegetation response to climate change on Jeju Island, South Korea, during the last deglaciation based pollen record. Geosci J, 2007, 11: 147–155, 10.1007/BF02913928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kong W S. Selection of vulnerable indicator plants by global warming. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci, 2005, 41(2-1): 263–273Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kong W S. Species composition and distribution of Native Korean Conifers. J Korean Geog Soc, 2004, 39: 528–543Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Koo K A, Kong W S, Kim C K. Distribution of evergreen broad-leaved plants and climatic factors. J Korean Geog Soc, 2001, 36: 247–257Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lee D K, Kim J U. Vulnerability assessment of sub-alpine vegetations by climate change in Korea (in Korean with English Abstract). J Korean Environ Restor Reveg Tech, 2007, 10: 110–119Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Center for Global Environmental Research. The potential effects of climate change in Japan-Chapter 3. In: Nishioka S, Harasawa H, Hashimoto H, et al., eds. Climate Changes and Forests. CGER with assistance of the Environment Agency of Japan, Tsukuba, Japan, 1993. 37–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sungho Choi
    • 1
  • Woo-Kyun Lee
    • 1
  • Yowhan Son
    • 1
  • Seongjin Yoo
    • 1
  • Jong-Hwan Lim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and Ecological EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Korea Forest Research InstituteSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations