Advertisement

Science in China Series C: Life Sciences

, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp 560–568 | Cite as

Analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among red jungle fowls and Chinese domestic fowls

  • WenBin Bao
  • GuoHong Chen
  • BiChun Li
  • XinSheng Wu
  • JingTing Shu
  • ShengLong Wu
  • Qi Xu
  • Steffen Weigend
Article

Abstract

Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among 568 individuals of two red jungle fowl subspecies (Gallus gallus spadiceus in China and Gallus gallus gallus in Thailand) and 14 Chinese domestic chicken breeds were evaluated with 29 microstaellite loci, the genetic variability within population and genetic differentiation among population were estimated, and then genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships were analyzed among red jungle fowls and Chinese domestic fowls. A total of 286 alleles were detected in 16 population with 29 microsatellite markers and the average number of the alleles observed in 29 microsatellite loci was 9.86±6.36. The overall expected heterozygosity of all population was 0.6708±0.0251, and the number of population deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium per locus ranged from 0 to 7. In the whole population, the average of genetic differentiation among population, measured as FST value, was 16.7% (P<0.001), and all loci contributed significantly (P<0.001) to this differentiation. It can also be seen that the deficit of heterozygotes was very high (0.015) (P<0.01). Reynolds’ distance values varied between 0.036 (Xiaoshan chicken-Luyuan chicken pair) and 0.330 (G. gallus gallus-Gushi chicken pair). The Nm value ranged from 0.533 (between G. gallus gallus and Gushi chicken) to 5.833 (between Xiaoshan chicken and Luyuan chicken). An unrooted consensus tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method and the Reynolds’ genetic distance. The heavy-body sized chicken breeds, Luyuan chicken, Xiaoshan chicken, Beijing Fatty chicken, Henan Game chicken, Huainan Partridge and Langshan chicken formed one branch, and it had a close genetic relationship between Xiaoshan chicken-Luyuan chicken pair and Chahua chicken-Tibetan chicken pair. Chahua chicken and Tibetan chicken had closer genetic relationship with these two subspecies of red jungle fowl than other domestic chicken breeds. G. gallus spadiceus showed closer phylogenetic relationship with Chinese domestic chicken breeds than G. gallus gallus. All 29 microstaellite loci in this study showed high levels of polymorphism and significant genetic differentiation was observed among two subspecies of red jungle fowl and 14 Chinese domestic chicken breeds. The evolutional dendrogram is as follows: evolutional breeds→primitive breeds (Chahua chicken and Tibetan)→red jungle fowl in China (G. gallus spadiceus)→red jungle fowl in Thailand (G. gallus gallus). The results supported the theory that the domestic fowls might originate from different subspecies of red jungle fowl and Chinese domestic fowls had independent origin.

Keywords

red jungle fowl domestic fowl microsatellite genetic diversity phylogenetic relationship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zheng Z X. Fauna Sinica, Aves Vol. 4, Galliformes (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 1978Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bo W C. Proceedings of the Origin of Chinese Domestic Animals (in Chinese). Shanxi: Tianze Press, 1993. 45–61Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng G C, Liu K F, Zhang Q, et al. Studies on genetic relationship between red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Acta Genet Sin (in Chinese), 1996, 23(2): 96–104Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Y P, Wu G S, Yao Y G, et al. Multiple maternal origins of chickens: Out of the Asian jungles. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 2006, 38: 12–19, 16275023, 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.09.014, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtlSiu7vICrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang W, Lan H, Liu A H, et al. Study on the polymorphism of mtDNA between domestic fowl and red jungle fowl. Zool Res (in Chinese), 1994, 15(4): 45–61Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fu Y, Niu D, Luo J, et al. Studies of the origin of Chinese domestic fowl. Acta Genet Sin (in Chinese), 2001, 28(5): 411–417, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXktlyhs7o%3DGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weigend S, Romanov M N. Current strategies for the assessment and evaluation of genetic diversity in chicken resources. World Poultry Sci J, 2001, 57(3): 275–288, 10.1079/WPS20010020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hillel J, Groenen M A M, Tixier-Boichard M, et al. Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet Sel Evol, 2003, 35: 533–557, 12939204, 10.1051/gse:2003038, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXnvF2ktLs%3DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sambrook J, Russell D W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2002Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park S D E. Trypanotolerance in West African Cattle and the Population Genetic Effects of Selection. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Dublin: University of Dublin, 2001Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Botstein D, White R, Skolnick M. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet, 1980, 32: 314–331, 6247908, 1:CAS:528:DyaL3cXkvFamtbc%3DGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goudet J. FSTAT version 2.9.3.2 Lausanne: Department of Ecology & Evolution, University of Lausanne, 2002Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raymond M, Rousset F. Population genetics software for exact test and ecumenicism. J Hered, 1995, 86: 248–249Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol, 1987, 4: 406–425, 3447015, 1:STN:280:BieC1cbgtVY%3DGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vanhala T, Tuiskula-Haavisto M, Elo K, et al. Evaluation of genetic distances between eight chicken lines using microsatellite markers. Poultry Sci, 1998, 77: 783–790, 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ptVCrtQ%3D%3DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maudet C, Miller C, Bassano B, et al. Microsatellite DNA and recent statistical methods in wild conservation management: application in Alpine ibex Capra ibex (ibex). Mol Ecol, 2002, 11: 421–436, 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01451.x, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XislCgtr0%3DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ott J. Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage. (revised ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    West B, Zhou B X. Did chickens go north? New evidence for domestication. J Archaeol Sci, 1988, 15: 515–533, 10.1016/0305-4403(88)90080-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang C F, Zhang L, Li J Y, et al. Analysis of body conformation and fitting growth model in Tibetan chicken raised in plain. Sci Agric Sin (in Chinese), 2005, 38(5): 1065–1068Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fumihito A, Miyake T, Sumi S, et al. One subspecies of the red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus gallus) suffices as the matriarchic ancestor of all domestic breeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91: 12505–12509, 7809067, 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12505, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXivVCrsbY%3DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fumihito A, Miyake T, Takada M, et al. Monophyletic origin and unique dispersal patterns of domestic fowls. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93: 6792–6795, 8692897, 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6792, 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjvFeitrk%3DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Y P, Zhu Q, Zeng F T, et al. The polymorphism study on the Gallus mtDNA control region partly sequences. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica (in Chinese), 2004, 35(2): 134–140Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • WenBin Bao
    • 1
  • GuoHong Chen
    • 1
  • BiChun Li
    • 1
  • XinSheng Wu
    • 1
  • JingTing Shu
    • 1
  • ShengLong Wu
    • 1
  • Qi Xu
    • 1
  • Steffen Weigend
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Animal Science and TechnologyYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
  2. 2.Institute for Animal BreedingFederal Agricultural Research CentreMarienseeGermany

Personalised recommendations