Advertisement

Conservation needs of amphibians in China: A review

  • Xie Feng 
  • Michael Wai Neng Lau
  • Simon N. Stuart
  • Janice S. Chanson
  • Neil A. Cox
  • Debra L. Fischman
Article

Abstract

The conservation status of all the amphibians in China is analyzed, and the country is shown to be a global priority for conservation in comparison to many other countries of the world. Three Chinese regions are particularly rich in amphibian diversity: Hengduan, Nanling, and Wuyi mountains. Salamanders are more threatened than frogs and toads. Several smaller families show a high propensity to become seriously threatened: Bombinatoridae, Cryptobranchidae, Hynobiidae and Salamandridae. Like other parts of the world, stream-breeding, high-elevation forest amphibians have a much higher likelihood of being seriously threatened. Habitat loss, pollution, and over-harvesting are the most serious threats to Chinese amphibians. Over-harvesting is a less pervasive threat than habitat loss, but it is more likely to drive a species into rapid decline. Five conservation challenges are mentioned with recommendations for the highest priority research and conservation actions.

Keywords

amphibians conservation status priority of the regions and animal group habitat preferences conservation challenge conservation recommendation 

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao E M. Distribution patterns of amphibians in temperate Eastern Asia. In: Duellman W E, ed. Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians — A Global Perspective, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1999. 421–443Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mittermeier R A, Myers N, Robles Gil P, et al. Hotspots—Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Mexico City: CEMEX/Conservation International, 1999Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Myers N, Mittermeier R A, Mittermeier C G, et al. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 2000, 403: 853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brooks T M, Mittermeier R A, Mittermeier C G, et al. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv Biol, 2002, 16: 909–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Olson D M, Dinerstein E. The Global 200: A representational approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv Biol, 1998, 12: 502–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alford R A, Richards S J. Global amphibian declines: A problem in applied ecology. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 1999, 30: 133–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biek R, Funk W C, Maxell B A, et al. What is missing in amphibian decline research: insights from ecological sensitivity analysis. Conserv Biol, 2002, 16: 728–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carey C, Cohen N, Rollins-Smith L. Amphibian declines: An immunological perspective. Dev Comp Immunol, 1999, 23: 459–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daszak P, Berger L, Cunningham A A, et al. Emerging infectious diseases and amphibian population declines. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 1999, 5: 735–748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daszak P, Cunningham A A, Hyatt A D. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife-threats to biodiversity and human health. Science, 2000, 287: 443–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Houlahan J E, Findlay C S, Schmidt B R, et al. Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature, 2000, 404: 752–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kats L B, Ferrer R P. Alien predators and amphibian declines: Review of two decades of science and the transition to conservation. Diversity and Distributions 2003, 9: 99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kieseker J M, Blaustein A R, Belden L K. Complex causes of amphibian population decline. Nature, 2001, 410: 681–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laurance W F. Catastrophic declines of Australian rainforest frogs: Is unusual weather responsible? Biol Conserv, 1996, 77: 203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pounds J A, Fogden M P L, Savage J M, et al. Test of null models for amphibian declines on a tropical mountain. Conserv Biol, 1997, 11: 1307–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wake D B. Declining amphibian populations. Science, 1991, 253: 860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. Global Amphibian Assessment. 2004. 〈 www.globalamphibians.org 〉. Downloaded on 15 October 2004Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stuart S N, Chanson J S, Cox N A, et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science, 2004, 306:173–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frost D. The amphibian species of the world: an online reference. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. Downloaded on 15 October 2004
  20. 20.
    Rodrigues A S L, Andelman S J, Bakarr M I, et al. Global gap analysis: Towards a representative network of protected areas. Adv Appl Biodiv Sci, 2003, 5: 1–98Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    He X R. Cynops wolterstoffi, an analysis of the factors caused its extinction. Sichuan Zool J, 1998, 17(2): 58–60Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ron S R, Duellman W E, Coloma L A, et al. Population decline of the Jambato Toad Atelopus ignescens (Anura: Bufonidae) in the Andes of Ecuador. J Herpetol, 2003, 37: 116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burrowes P A, Joglar R L, Green D E. Potential causes for amphibian declines in Puerto Rico. Herpetologica, 2004, 60: 141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li Y, Wilcove D S. Threats to vertebrate species in China and the United States. BioScience, 2005, 55: 147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu Z, Li Y, Wang Y, et al. Diet of introduced bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): Predation on and diet overlap with native frogs on Daishan Island, China. J Herpetol, 2005, 39(4): 668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xie Y. Problems in the Protected Area Management in China. World Park Congress Report, 2003Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodrigues A S L, Andelman S J, Bakarr M I, et al. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature, 2004, 428: 640–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang K J, Wang X M, Wu W, et al. Advances in conservation biology of Chinese giant salamander. Biodiv Sci (in Chinese, with English abstract), 2002, 10(3): 291–297Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang X M, Zhang K J, Wang Z H, et al. The decline of the Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus and implications for its conservation. Oryx, 2004, 38: 197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Welsh H H, Droege S. A case for using plethodontid salamanders for monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem integrity of North American forests. Conserv Biol, 2004, 15: 558–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zug G R, Vitt, L J, Caldwell J P. Herpetology. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press, 2001Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Laurance W F, McDonald K R, Speare R. Epidemic disease and the catastrophic decline of Australian rain forest frogs. Conserv Biol, 1996, 10: 406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pahkala M, Laurila A, Merilä J. Carry-over effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on larval fitness in Rana temporaria. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B, 2001, 268: 1699–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gamradit S S, Kats L B. Effect of introduced crayfish and mosquito-fish on California newts. Conserv Biol, 1996, 10: 1155–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lawler S P, Dritz D, Strange T, et al. Effects of introduced mosquito-fish and bullfrogs on the threatened California red-legged frog. Conserv Biol, 1999, 13: 613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li Z Y, Xie Y. Invasive Alien Species in China (in Chinese). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2003Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ye C Y, Fei L, Hu S Q. Rare and Economic Amphibians of China (in Chinese). Chengdu: Sichuan Publishing House of Science and Technology, 1993Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li H M, Wang F J. Ecology of Economic Anurans and Breeding Engineering (in Chinese). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1995Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jensen J B, Camp C D. Human exploitation of amphibians. Direct and indirect impacts. In Semlitsch R D, ed. Amphibian Conservation. Washington D C and London: Smithsonian Books, 2003. 199–213Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hayes T B, Collins A, Lee M, et al. Hermaphroditic, demasculinized frogs after exposure to the herbicide Atrazine at low ecologically relevant doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002a, 99: 5476–5480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hayes T B, Haston K, Tsui M, et al. Feminization of male frogs in the wild. Nature, 2002b, 419: 895–896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Withgot J. Ubiquitous herbicide emasculates frogs. Science, 2002, 296: 447–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Berger L, Speare R, Daszak P, et al. Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rainforests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95: 9031–9036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bridges C M, Smelitsch R D. Variation in pesticide tolerance of tadpoles among and within species of Tanidae and patterns of amphibian decline. Conserv Biol, 2000, 14: 1490–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhao E M. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Amphibia and Reptilia. Beijing: Science Press, 1998Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lips K R. Mass mortality and population declines of anurans at an upland site in western Panama. Conserv Biol, 1999, 13: 117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bosch J, Martínez-Solano I, García-París M. Evidence of a chytrid fungus infection involved in the decline of the common midwife toad (Alytes obstetricans) in protected areas of central Spain. Biol Conserv, 2001, 97: 331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bell B D, Carver S, Mitchell N J, et al. The recent decline of a New Zealand endemic: How and why did populations of Archey’s frog Leiopelma archeyi crash over 1996–2001. Biol Conserv, 2004, 120: 189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lips K R, Reeve J D, Witters L R. Ecological traits predicting amphibian population declines in Central America. Conserv Biol, 2003, 17: 1078–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xie Feng 
    • 1
  • Michael Wai Neng Lau
    • 2
  • Simon N. Stuart
    • 3
  • Janice S. Chanson
    • 3
  • Neil A. Cox
    • 3
  • Debra L. Fischman
    • 4
  1. 1.Chengdu Institute of BiologyChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.Kadoorie Farm and Botanic GardenHong KongChina
  3. 3.IUCN-SSC/CI-CABS Biodiversity Assessment Unit, Center for Applied Biodiversity ScienceConservation InternationalWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.GIS Laboratory, Center for Applied Biodiversity ScienceConservation InternationalWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations