Molecular behavior of the aptamer HJ24 self-assembled on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG)
- 88 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
Nucleic acid sensing analysis has been widely applied to the fields of food quality control, environmental monitoring, and medical diagnosis. A key step in developing effective DNA-based electrochemical biosensors is to obtain a biorecognition layer on the biosensor, which can be influenced by many factors. Hence, we constructed a series of HJ24 layers on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite to investigate the relation between the configuration of the adsorbed probe HJ24 and the redox property using atomic force microscopy and voltammetry. We used HJ24 for its diagnostic value as it specifically recognizes the SH2 domain-containing phosphatase, a critical contributor in many important signaling pathways. The results demonstrated that increasing K ions induced G-quartet oxidation peak occurrence/increase ([K+]⩽400 mmol/L), and also resulted in the formation of more compact single strand sheets ([K+]⩽300 mmol/L). Moreover, transitions of molecule configurations and redox currents of G-quartets were observed at low concentration [K+]=12 mmol/L, which may indicate the appearance of new configurations under this condition. Besides, by analyzing atomic force microscopy (AFM) images, it was found that the different adsorbed configurations are correlated with the HJ24 concentration, the basal configuration, and the linker group on the HJ24 sequence. This information may be useful for understanding the adsorption process of HJ24 as well as for the further development of practical applications for HJ24 films on DNA electrochemical sensors, and may ultimately help improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with SHP2-related diseases.
Keywords
self-assembly G-quadruplex DNA SHP2 Atomic force microscopy HOPGPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Gunkel-Grabole G, Sigg S, Lomora M, Lörcher S, Palivan CG, Meier WP. Biomater Sci, 2015, 3: 25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Dzieciol AJ, Mann S. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41: 79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Zhan P, Jiang Q, Wang ZG, Li N, Yu H, Ding B. Chem Med Chem, 2014, 9: 2013–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Zhao WW, Xu JJ, Chen HY. Chem Rev, 2014, 114: 7421–7441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Lin M, Wang J, Zhou G, Wang J, Wu N, Lu J, Gao J, Chen X, Shi J, Zuo X, Fan C. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54: 2151–2155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kim MG, Shon Y, Lee J, Byun Y, Choi BS, Kim YB, Oh YK. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 2999–3004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Baaske MD, Foreman MR, Vollmer F. Nat Nano, 2014, 9: 933–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Wei W, Ni Q, Pu Y, Yin L, Liu S. J Electroanal Chem, 2014, 714: 25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Vidal JC, Bonel L, Ezquerra A, Hernández S, Bertolín JR, Cubel C, Castillo JR. Biosens Bioelectron, 2013, 49: 146–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Li M, Li YT, Li DW, Long YT. Anal Chim Acta, 2012, 734: 31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Laschi S, Tombelli S, Palchetti I, Mascini M, Marrazza G. New affinity biosensors as diagnostic tools for tumour marker analysis. In: Baldini F, Amico A, Natale C, Siciliano P, Seeber R, Stefano L, Bizzarri R, Ando B, Eds. Sensors: Proceedings of the First National Conference on Sensors. Rome: Springer, 2014. 19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Biffi G, Tannahill D, Mc Cafferty J, Balasubramanian S. Nat Chem, 2013, 5: 182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bochman ML, Paeschke K, Zakian VA. Nat Rev Genet, 2012, 13: 770–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Onel B, Lin C, Yang D. Sci China Chem, 2014, 57: 1605–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Yatsunyk LA, Mendoza O, Mergny JL. Acc Chem Res, 2014, 47: 1836–1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hu J, Wu J, Li C, Zhu L, Zhang WY, Kong G, Lu Z, Yang CJ. Chem Bio Chem, 2011, 12: 424–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Heuberger J, Kosel F, Qi J, Grossmann KS, Rajewsky K, Birchmeier W. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2014, 111: 3472–3477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Luo H, Tang C, Yang X, Zhou X. Med Chem, 2014, 4: 435–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Song Y, Lian W, Zhao S, Wang L, Li Z. Microsc Res Tech, 2010, 73: 51–57Google Scholar
- 20.Paquim AM, Oretskaya TS, Brett AM. Biophys Chem, 2006, 121: 131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Chiorcea-Paquim AM, Santos PV, Oliveira-Brett AM. Electrochim Acta, 2013, 110: 599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Coveney PV, Swadling JB, Wattis JA, Greenwell HC. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41: 5430–5446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Brett CM, Brett AM, Serrano SH. J Electroanal Chem, 1994, 366: 225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Lyubchenko Y, Gall A, Shlyakhtenko L. Visualization of DNA and protein-DNA complexes with atomic force microscopy. In: Kuo J, Ed. Electron Microscopy. Humana Press, 2014, 1117: 367–384Google Scholar
- 25.Chiorcea-Paquim AM, Santos PV, Eritja R, Oliveira-Brett AM. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013, 15: 9117–9124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Neaves KJ, Huppert JL, Henderson RM, Edwardson JM. Nucleic Acids Res, 2009, 37: 6269–6275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kang C, Zhang X, Ratliff R, Moyzis R, Rich A. Nature, 1992, 356: 126–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Lee L, Cavalieri F, Johnston AP, Caruso F. Langmuir, 2009, 26: 3415–3422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Balint Z, Nagy K, Laczko I, Bottka S, Vegh GA, Szegletes Z, Váró G. J Phys Chem C, 2007, 111: 17032–17037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Rodrigues Pontinha AD, Chiorcea-Paquim AM, Eritja R, Oliveira-Brett AM. Anal Chem, 2014, 86: 5851–5857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Rosario R, Mutharasan R. Rev Anal Chem, 2014, 33: 213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Zhao XQ, Wu J, Liang JH, Yan JW, Zhu Z, Yang CJ, Mao B. J Phys Chem B, 2012, 116: 11397–11404CrossRefGoogle Scholar