Science China Mathematics

, Volume 61, Issue 10, pp 1907–1922 | Cite as

Conditional-quantile screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data via martingale difference correlation

  • Kai XuEmail author
  • Xudong Huang


Using the so-called martingale difference correlation (MDC), we propose a novel censored-conditional-quantile screening approach for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data with heterogeneity (which is often present in such data). By incorporating a weighting scheme, this method is a natural extension of MDC-based conditional quantile screening, as considered in Shao and Zhang (2014), to handle ultrahigh-dimensional survival data. The proposed screening procedure has a sure-screening property under certain technical conditions and an excellent capability of detecting the nonlinear relationship between independent and censored dependent variables. Both simulation results and an analysis of real data demonstrate the effectiveness of the new censored conditional quantile-screening procedure.


ultrahigh-dimensional survival data martingale difference correlation censored-conditional-quantile screening sure-screening property 


62G08 62G20 62H20 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was supported by the National Statistical Scientific Research Projects (Grant No. 2015LZ54). The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which have led to a dramatic improvement of the earlier version of this article.


  1. 1.
    Bair E, Tibshirani R. Semi-supervised methods to predict patient survival from gene expression data. PLoS Biol, 2004, 2: 511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chu W, Li R, Reimherr M. Feature screening for time-varying coEfficient models with ultrahigh dimensional longitudinal data. Ann Appl Stat, 2016, 10: 596–617MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cui H, Li R, Zhong W. Model free feature screening for ultrahigh dimensional discriminant analysis. J Amer Statist Assoc, 2015, 110: 630–641MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fan J, Feng Y, Wu Y. Ultrahigh dimensional variable selection for Cox’s proportional hazards model. Inst Math Stat Collect, 2010, 6: 70–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fan J, Lv J. Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol, 2008, 70: 849–911MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    He X, Wang L, Hong H. Quantile-adaptive model-free variable screening for high-dimensional heterogeneous data. Ann Statist, 2013, 41: 342–369MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kong Y, Li D, Fan Y, et al. Interaction pursuit in high-dimensional multi-response regression via distance correlation. Ann Statist, 2016, 45: 897–922MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li G, Peng H, Zhang J, et al. Robust rank correlation based screening. Ann Statist, 2012, 40: 1846–1877MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li R, Zhong W, Zhu L. Feature screening via distance correlation learning. J Amer Statist Assoc, 2012, 107: 1129–1139MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma S, Li R, Tsai C-L. Variable screening via partial quantile correlation. J Amer Statist Assoc, 2017, 112: 650–663MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pan R, Wang H, Li R. Ultrahigh dimensional multi-class linear discriminant analysis by pairwise sure independence screening. J Amer Statist Assoc, 2016, 111: 169–179MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosenwald A, Wright G, Chan W C, et al. The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. New Engl J Med, 2002, 346: 1937–1947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Serfling R L. Approximation Theorems in Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley, 1980CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shao X, Zhang J. Martingale difference correlation and its use in high dimensional variable screening. J Amer Statist Assoc, 2014, 109: 1302–1318MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Song R, Lu W, Ma S, et al. Censored rank independence screening for high-dimensional survival data. Biometrika, 2014, 101: 799–814MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szekely G J, Rizzo M L, Bakirov N K. Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances. Ann Statist, 2007, 35: 2769–2794MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang L, Liu J, Li Y, et al. Model-free conditional independence feature screening for ultrahigh dimensional data. Sci China Math, 2017, 60: 551–568MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang J, Wang L. Locally weighted censored quantile regression. J Amer Statist Assoc, 2009, 104: 1117–1128MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu Y, Yin G. Conditional quantile screening in ultrahigh-dimensional heterogeneous data. Biometrika, 2015, 102: 65–76MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang G R, Yu Y, Li R Z, et al. Feature screening in ultrahigh dimensional Cox’s model. Statist Sinica, 2016, 26: 881–901MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao S, Li Y. Principled sure independence screening for Cox models with ultrahigh-dimensional covariates. J Multi-variate Anal, 2012, 105: 397–411CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhou T, Zhu L. Model-free feature screening for ultrahigh dimensional censored regression. Stat Comput, 2017, 27: 947–961MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhu L, Li L, Li R, et al. Model-free feature screening for ultrahigh dimensional data. J Amer Statist Assoc, 2011, 106: 1464–1475MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematics and StatisticsAnhui Normal UniversityWuhuChina
  2. 2.School of Statistics and ManagementShanghai University of Finance and EconomicsShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations