Advertisement

Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 1227–1243 | Cite as

Event-Triggered Consensus for Multiple Nonholonomic Systems

  • Miao Li
  • Zhongxin Liu
  • Zengqiang Chen
Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

The paper investigates the consensus problem of multiple nonholonomic systems. Two event-triggered control strategies, one centralized and the other distributed, are developed, which can reduce the frequency of control updating. Under the proposed protocols, the multiple nonholonomic systems can achieve consensus, and the bound of inter-event time intervals is provided to illustrate that no Zeno behavior exists. Finally, numerical simulations are also provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control strategies.

Keywords

Consensus event-triggered control multiple nonholonomic systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Jadbabaie A, Lin J, and Morse A S, Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2003, 48(6): 988–1001.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Fax J A and Murray R M, Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2002, 35(1): 115–120.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Yao Y, Cooperative navigation system for multiple unmanned underwater vehicles, Intelligent Control & Automation Science, 2013, 46(20): 719–723.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Garcia-Sanz M, Cooperative control of multiple spacecraft flying in formation, IET Control Theory & Applications, 2007, 1(2): 443–444.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Olfati-Saber R and Murray R M, Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2015, 49(9): 1520–1533.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Wang Z H, You K Y, Xu J J, et al., Consensus design for continuous-time multi-agent systems with communication delay, Journal System Sciences & Complexity, 2014, 27(4): 701–711.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Qin W, Liu Z X, and Chen Z Q, Impulsive observer-based consensus control for multi-agent systems with time delay, International Journal of Control, 2015, 88(9): 1–35.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Li S H, Du H B, and Lin X Z, Finite-time consensus algorithm for multi-agent systems with double-integrator dynamics, Automatica, 2011, 47(8): 1706–1712.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Zhao J and Liu G P, Time-variant consensus tracking control for networked planar multi-agent systems with non-holonomic constraints, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2017, 30(2): 396–418.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Divelbiss A W and Wen J T, Trajectory tracking control of a car-trailer system, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 1997, 5(3): 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Liu H D, Liang B, Wang X Q, et al., Autonomous path planning and experiment study of free-floating space robot for spinning satellite capturing, International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision, Singapore, 2014.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Zhai G S, Takeda J, Imae J, et al., Towards consensus in networked non-holonomic systems, IET Control Theory & Applications, 2010, 4(10): 2212–2218.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Cao K C, Jiang B, and Chen Y Q, Cooperative control design for non-holonomic chained-form systems, International Journal of Systems Science, 2015, 46(9): 1525–1539.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Chen C Y, Xing Y F, Djapic V, et al., Distributed formation tracking control of multiple mobile robotic systems, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Los Angeles, USA, 2014.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Ou M Y, Du H B, and Li S H, Finite-time formation control of multiple nonholonomic mobile robots, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2014, 24(1): 140–165.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Du H B, Wen G H, Yu X H, et al., Finite-time consensus of multiple nonholonomic chained-form systems based on recursive distributed observer, Automatica, 2015, 62(C): 236–242.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Dimarogonas D V and Johansson K H, Event-triggered control for multi-agent systems, Joint the 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and the 28th Chinese Control Conference, Shanghai, China, 2009.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Liu Z X and Chen Z Q, Event-triggered average-consensus for multi-agent systems, Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control Conference, Beijing, China, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Liu Z X, Chen Z Q, and Yuan Z Z, Event-triggered average consensus of multi-agent systems with weighted and direct topology, Journal System Sciences & Complexity, 2012, 25(5): 845–855.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Dimarogonas D V, Frazzoli E, and Johansson K H, Distributed event-triggered control for multiagent systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57(5): 1291–1297.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Zhang H P, Yue D, Yin X X, et al., Finite-time distributed event-triggered consensus control for multi-agent systems, Information Sciences An International Journal, 2016, 339(C): 132–142.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Yan H C, Shen Y C, Zhang H, et al., Decentralized event-triggered consensus control for secondorder multi-agent systems, Neurocomputing, 2014, 133(1): 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Xie D S, Xu S Y, Li Z, et al., Event-triggered consensus control for second-order multi-agent systems, IET Control Theory & Applications, 2015, 9(5): 667–680.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Yi X L, Lu W L, and Chen T P, Distributed event-triggered consensus for multi-agent systems with directed topologies, Chinese Control and Decision Conference. Yinchuan, China, 2016.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Fan Y, Feng G, Wang Y, et al., Distributed event-triggered control of multi-agent systems with combinational measurements, Automatica, 2013, 49(2): 671–675.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Huang H W, Huang T M, Wu S, et al., Leader-following consensus of second-order multi-agent systems via event-triggeredcontrol, Control and Decision, 2016, 31(5): 835–841.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Hu W F, Liu L, and Feng G, Consensus of linear multi-agent systems by distributed eventtriggered strategy, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2016, 46(1): 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Zhao M, Peng C, He W L, et al., Event-triggered communication for leader-following consensus of second-order multi-agent systems, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2017, (99): 1–10, DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2716970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Liu X, Zhong S M, and Ding X Y, Robust exponential stability of nonlinear impulsive switched systems with time-varying delays, Nonlinear Analysis Modelling & Control, 2012, 17(2): 210–222.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Murray R M and Sastry S S, Nonholonomic motion planning: Steering using sinusoids, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1993, 38(5): 700–716.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Bloch A M, Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Khalil H K, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Systems Science, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Computer and Control EngineeringNankai UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Intelligent RoboticsNankai UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations