FIR systems identification under quantized output observations and a large class of persistently exciting quantized inputs
- 77 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
This paper investigates the FIR systems identification with quantized output observations and a large class of quantized inputs. The limit inferior of the regressors’ frequencies of occurrences is employed to characterize the input’s persistent excitation, under which the strong convergence and the convergence rate of the two-step estimation algorithm are given. As for the asymptotical efficiency, with a suitable selection of the weighting matrix in the algorithm, even though the limit of the product of the Cramér-Rao (CR) lower bound and the data length does not exist as the data length goes to infinity, the estimates still can be asymptotically efficient in the sense of CR lower bound. A numerical example is given to demonstrate the effectiveness and the asymptotic efficiency of the algorithm.
Keywords
Asymptotic efficiency FIR system identification quantized input quantized output observationsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Shen J, Tan H, Wang J, et al., A novel routing protocol providing good transmission reliability in underwater sensor networks, Journal of Internet Technology, 2015, 16(1): 171–178.Google Scholar
- [2]Xie S and Wang Yu, Construction of tree network with limited delivery latency in homogeneous wireless sensor networks, Wireless Personal Communications, 2014, 78(1): 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]Suzuki H and Sugie T, System identification based on quantized i/o data corrupted with noises, Transactions of the Institute of Systems, Control and Information Engineers, 2007, 20(5): 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]Casini M, Garulli A, and Vicino A, Input design in worst-case system identification using binary sensors, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2011, 56(5): 1186–1191.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]Wang L Y, Zhang J F, and Yin G, System identification using binary sensors, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2003, 48: 1892–1907.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [6]Agüero J C, Goodwin G C, and Yuz J I, System identification using quantized data, Proceedings of 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2007, 4263–4268.Google Scholar
- [7]He Q, Wang L Y, and Yin G, System Identification Using Regular and Quantized Observations: Applications of Large Deviations Principles, Springer, New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London, 2013.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [8]Kang G, Bi W, Zhao Y, et al., A new system identification approach to identify genetic variants in sequencing studies for a binary phenotype, Human Heredity, 2014, 78(2): 104–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]Wang T, Bi W, Zhao Y, et al., Target recognition algorithm based on RCS observation sequence — Set-valued identification method, Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, 2014, 881–886.Google Scholar
- [10]Wang L Y and Yin G, Quantized identification with dependent noise and fisher information ratio of communication channels, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2010, 55(3): 674–690.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]Casini M, Garulli A, and Vicino A, Input design in worst-case system identification with quantized measurements, Automatica, 2012, 48(12): 2997–3007.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [12]Zhao Y, Wang L Y, Zhang J F, et al., Jointly deterministic and stochastic identification of linear systems using binary-valued observations, Proceedings of 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, 2009, 60–65.Google Scholar
- [13]Wang L Y, Yin G, Zhang J F, et al., System Identification with Quantized Observations, MA: Birkhäuser, Boston, 2010.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [14]Yang X and Fang H, Asymptotically efficient recursive identification method for FIR system with quantized observations, Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, 2014, 6832–6837.Google Scholar
- [15]Guo J and Zhao Y, Recursive projection algorithm on FIR system identification with binaryvalued observations, Automatica, 2013, 49: 3396–3401.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [16]Marelli D, You K, and Fu M, Identification of ARMA models using intermittent and quantized output observations, Automatica, 2013, 49: 360–369.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [17]Godoy B, Goodwin G C, Agüero J, et al., On identification of FIR systems having quantized output data, Automatica, 2011, 47(9): 1905–1915.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [18]Guo J, Zhang J F, and Zhao Y, Adaptive tracking control of a class of first-order systems with binary-valued observations and time-varying thresholds, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2011, 56(12): 2991–2996.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]Guo J, Wang L Y, Yin G, et al., Asymptotically efficient identification of FIR systems with quantized observations and general quantized inputs, Automatica, 2015, 57(6): 113–122.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [20]Wang L Y and Yin G, Asymptotically efficient parameter estimation using quantized output observations, Automatica, 2007, 43: 1178–1191.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [21]Kariya T and Kurata H, Generalized Least Squares, Wiley, England, 2004.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [22]Mei H, Yin G, and Wang L Y, Almost sure convergence rates for system identification using binary, quantized, and regular sensors, Automatica, 2014, 50(8): 2120–2127.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar