Advertisement

Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 4–13 | Cite as

Overview of complex systems in sport

  • Natàlia BalagueEmail author
  • Carlota Torrents
  • Robert Hristovski
  • Keith Davids
  • Duarte Araújo
Article

Abstract

The complex systems approach offers an opportunity to replace the extant pre-dominant mechanistic view on sport-related phenomena. The emphasis on the environment-system relationship, the applications of complexity principles, and the use of nonlinear dynamics mathematical tools propose a deep change in sport science. Coordination dynamics, ecological dynamics, and network approaches have been successfully applied to the study of different sport-related behaviors, from movement patterns that emerge at different scales constrained by specific sport contexts to game dynamics. Sport benefit from the use of such approaches in the understanding of technical, tactical, or physical conditioning aspects which change their meaning and dilute their frontiers. The creation of new learning and training strategies for teams and individual athletes is a main practical consequence. Some challenges for the future are investigating the influence of key control parameters in the nonlinear behavior of athlete-environment systems and the possible relatedness of the dynamics and constraints acting at different spatio-temporal scales in team sports. Modelling sport-related phenomena can make useful contributions to a better understanding of complex systems and vice-versa.

Key words

Constraints-led approach coordination dynamics performer-environment system selforganization team dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Pol R, La Preparación ¿Física? en el Fúbol, E & McSports, Pontevedra, 2011.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Balagué N and Torrents C, Complejidad y Deporte, E & Inde, Barcelona, 2011.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Seirul.lo F, Hacia una sinergética del entrenamiento, Apuntes de Medicina Deportiva, 1976, 13: 93–94.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Salomon J, Carello C, and Turvey M, Flow fields: The optical support for skilled activities. Cognitive Sport Psychology (ed. by Straub W F and Williams J M), E & Sport Science Associates, Lansing, 1984, 129–139.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Davids K, Handford C, and Williams M, The natural physical alternative to cognitive theories of motor behavior: An invitation for interdisciplinary research in sports science? Journal of Sports Sciences, 1994, 12: 495–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kelso J A S, Dynamic Patterns — The Self-Organisation of Brain and Behaviour, E & MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Kelso J A S, Coordination dynamics, Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Sciences (ed. by Meyers R A), E & Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009, 1537–1564.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Haken H, Kelso J A S, and Bunz H, A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements, Biological Cybernetics, 1985, 51: 347–356.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Newell K M, Constraints on the development of coordination, Motor development in children. Aspects of coordination and control (ed. by Wade M G and Whiting H T A), E & Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1986, 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hristovski R and Balagué N, Fatigue-induced spontaneous termination point — Nonequilibrium phase transitions and critical behavior in quasi-isometric exertion, Human Movement Science, 2010, 51: 483–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Balagué N, Hristovski R, Aragonés D, and Tenenbaum G, Nonlinear model of attention focus during accumulated effort, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, in press.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Davids K, Button C, Araújo D, Renshaw I, and Hristovski R, Movement models from sports provide representative task constraints for studying adaptive behavior in human movement systems, Adaptive Behavior, 2006, 14(1): 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Davids K and Araújo D, The concept of ‘Organismic Asymmetry’ in sport science, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2010, 7: 633–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Araújo D, Davids K, and Hristovski R, The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2006, 7: 653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Gibson J J, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, E & Houghton Mifflin Company, USA, 1979.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Haken H, Information and Self-Organization. A Macroscopic Approach to Complex Systems, E & Springer, New York, 2000.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Perl J and Dauscher P, Dynamic pattern recognition in sport by means of artificial neural networks, Computational Intelligence for Movement Science (ed. by Begg R and Palaniswami M), E & Idea Group Publishing, London, 2006, 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Memmert D and Perl J, Game creativity analysis by means of neural networks, Journal of Sport Science, 2009, 27: 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Perl J, Game analysis and control by means of continuously learning networks, International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 2002, 2: 21–35.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Grunz A, Memmert D, and Perl J, Analysis and simulation of actions in games by means of special self-organizing maps, International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 2009, 1: 22–37.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Baldissera F, Cavallari P, and Civashi P, Preferential coupling between voluntary movements of ipsilateral limbs, Neuroscience Letters, 1982, 34: 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Kelso J A S and Jeka J J, Symmetry breaking dynamics of human interlimb coordination, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1992, 18: 645–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Turvey M T, Coordination, American Psychologist, 1990, 45: 938–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Kelso J A S, Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 1984, 15: R1000–R1004.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Fitzpatrick P, Schmidt R C, and Lockman J J F, Dynamical patterns in the development of clapping, Child Development, 1996, 67: 2691–2708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Jantzen K J, Oullier O, and Kelso J A S, Neuroimaging coordination dynamics in the sport sciences, Methods, 2008, 45: 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Schmidt R C, Carello C, and Turvey M, Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1990, 16: 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Cignetti F, Schena F, Zanone P G, and Rouard A P, Dynamics of coordination in cross-country skiing, Human Movement Science, 2009, 228: 204–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Seifert L, Button C, and Brazier T, Interacting constraints and inter-limb coordination in swimming, Motor Learning in Practice: A Constraints-Led Approach (ed. by Renshaw I, Davids K, and Savelsbergh G), E & Routledge, London, 2010.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    McGarry T, Anderson D I, Wallace A, Hughes M D, and Franks I, Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2002, 20: 771–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Duarte R, Araújo D, Gazimba V, Fernandes O, Folgado H, Marmeleira J, and Davids K, The Ecological dynamics of 1v1 sub-phases in association football, The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 2010, 3: 16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Passos P, Araújo D, Davids K, Gouveia L, Milho J, and Serpa S, Information-governing dynamics of attacker-defender interactions in youth rugby union, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2008, 26(13): 1421–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Araújo D, Davids K, Bennett S, Button C, and Chapman G L, Emergence of sports skills under constraints, Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice (ed. by Williams A M and Hodges N J), E & Routledge, London, 2004.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Schmidt R C, O’Brien B, and Sysko R T, Self-organization of between-persons cooperative tasks and possible applications to sport, Journal of Sport Psychology, 1999, 30: 558–579.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    McGarry T and Walter F, On the detection of space-time patterns in squash using dynamical analysis, International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 2007, 6: 42–49.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Palut Y and Zanone P G, A dynamical analysis of tennis: Concepts and data, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2005, 23: 1021–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Passos P, Milho J, Fonseca S, Borges J, Araújo D, and Davids K, Interpersonal distance regulates functional grouping tendencies of agents in team sports, Journal of Motor Behavior, 2011, 43: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Passos P, Davids K, Araújo D, Paz N, Minguéns J, and Mendes J, Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2011, 2: 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [38]
    McGarry T, Anderson D I, Wallace A, Hughes M D, and Franks I, Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2002, 20: 771–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [39]
    Haken H, Synergetics: An Introduction, E & Springer, Berlin, 1983.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [40]
    Perl J, Artificial neural networks in sports: New concepts and approaches, International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 2001, 1: 106–121.Google Scholar
  42. [41]
    Duch J, Waitzman J S, and Nunes Amaral L A, Quantifying the performance of individual players in a team activity, PLoS ONE, 2010, 5: e10937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [42]
    Mendes R S, Malacarne L C, and Anteneodo C J, Statistics of football dynamics, European Physics Journal, 2007, B57: 357–363.Google Scholar
  44. [43]
    Greenhough J, Birch P C, Chapman S C, and Rowlands G, Football goal distributions and extremal statistics, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2002, 1–4: 615–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [44]
    Malacarne L C and Mendes R S, Regularities in football goal distributions, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2000, 1–2: 391–395.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [45]
    Balagué N, Hristovski R, and Aragonés D, D. Rol de la intención en la terminación del ejercicio inducida por la fatiga. Aproximación no lineal [Role of intention in the fatigue-induced exercise termination] nonlinear approach, Revista de Psicologia del Deporte, 2011, 2: 505–521.Google Scholar
  47. [46]
    Schöllhorn W, Mayer-Kress G, Newell K, and Michelbrink M, Time scales of adaptive behavior and motor learning in the presence of stochastic perturbations, Human Movement Science, 2009, 3: 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [47]
    Hristovski R, Davids K, and Araújo D, Information for regulating action in sport: Metastability and emergence of tactical solutions under ecological constraints, Perspectives of Cognition and Action in Sport (ed. by Araújo D, Ripoll H, and Raab M), E & Nova Sci. Pub, USA, 2009.Google Scholar
  49. [48]
    Hristovski R, Davids K, and Araújo D, Affordance-controlled bifurcations of action patterns in martial arts, Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and the Life Sciences, 2006, 10: 409–444.Google Scholar
  50. [49]
    Hristovski R, Davids K, Araújo D, and Passos P, Constraints-induced emergence of functional novelty in complex neurobiological systems: A basis for creativity in sport, Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and the Life Sciences, 2011, 15: 175–206.Google Scholar
  51. [50]
    Hodges N J, McGarry T, and Franks I, A dynamical system’s approach to the examination of sport behaviour, Avante, 1998, 4: 16–38.Google Scholar
  52. [51]
    Davids K, Button C, and Bennet S, Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints-Led Approach, E & Human Kinetics, Champaign, 2008.Google Scholar
  53. [52]
    Bourbousson J, Seve C, and McGarry T, Space-time coordination dynamics in basketball: Part 1. Intra- and inter-couplings among player dyads, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2010, 28(3): 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [53]
    Lames M, Ertmer J, and Walter F, Oscillations in football - Order and disorder in spatial interactions between the two teams, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2011, (Special Issue): 85.Google Scholar
  55. [54]
    Travassos B, Araújo D, Correia V, and Esteves P, Eco-dynamics approach to the study of team sports performance, The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 2010, 3: 56–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [55]
    Hristovski R, Condensation of coherent states in social groups by the symmetry breaking mechanism, Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on FIS Communications, 1997, 279–282.Google Scholar
  57. [56]
    Trenchard H, Energy savings in bicycle pelotons, a general evolutionary mechanism and a framework for group formation in eusocial evolution, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Complex Systems (ed. by Sayama H, Minai A A, Braha D, and Bar-Yam Y), E & NECSI, USA, 2011.Google Scholar
  58. [57]
    Duarte R, Araújo D, Correia V, and Davids K, Sport teams as superorganisms: Implications of sociobiological models of behaviour for research and practice in team sports performance analysis, Sports Medicine, In press.Google Scholar
  59. [58]
    Trenchard H, Hysteresis in competitive bicycle pelotons, Complex Adaptive Systems — Resilience, Robustness and Evolvability: Papers from 2010 AAAI Fall Symposium FS-10-03, 130–137Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Systems Science, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natàlia Balague
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlota Torrents
    • 2
  • Robert Hristovski
    • 3
  • Keith Davids
    • 4
  • Duarte Araújo
    • 5
  1. 1.INEFCUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.INEFCUniversity of LleidaLleidaSpain
  3. 3.Ss. Cyril and Methodius UniversitySkopjeRepublic of Macedonia
  4. 4.School of Human Movement StudiesQueensland University of TechnologiesBrisbaneAustralia
  5. 5.Faculty of Human KineticsTechnical University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations