Advertisement

Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 971–977 | Cite as

A linear programming model based on network flow for pathway inference

  • Xianwen RenEmail author
  • Xiang-Sun Zhang
Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Signal transduction pathways play important roles in various biological processes such as cell cycle, apoptosis, proliferation, differentiation and responses to the external stimuli. Efficient computational methods are of great demands to map signaling pathways systematically based on the interactome and microarray data in the post-genome era. This paper proposes a novel approach to infer the pathways based on the network flow well studied in the operation research. The authors define a potentiality variable for each protein to denote the extent to which it contributes to the objective pathway. And the capacity on each edge is not a constant but a function of the potentiality variables of the corresponding two proteins. The total potentiality of all proteins is given an upper bound. The approach is formulated to a linear programming model and solved by the simplex method. Experiments on the yeast sporulation data suggest this novel approach recreats successfully the backbone of the MAPK signaling pathway with a low upper bound of the total potentiality. By increasing the upper bound, the approach successfully predicts all the members of the Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway responding to the pheromone. This simple but effective approach can also be used to infer the genetic information processing pathways underlying the expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) associations, illustrated by the second example.

Key words

Gene expression linear programming network flow pathway inference protein interaction network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Scott, T. Ideker, R.M. Karp, and R. Sharan, Efficient algorithms for detecting signaling pathways in protein interaction networks, Journal of Computational Biology, 2006, 13(2): 133–144.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Steffen, A. Petti, J. Aach, et al., Automated modelling of signal transduction networks, BMC Bioinformatics, 2002, 3(1): 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    X. M. Zhao, R. S. Wang, L. N. Chen, and K. Aihara, Automatic modeling of signaling pathways by network flow model, J. Bioinform Comput. Biol., 2009, 7(2): 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    X. M. Zhao, R. S. Wang, L. N. Chen, and K. Aihara, Uncovering signal transduction networks from high-throughput data by integer linear programming, Nucl. Acids Res., 2008, 36(9): e48–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. Kanehisa, S. Goto, S. Kawashima, and A. Nakaya, The kegg databases at genomenet, Nucl. Acids Res., 2002, 30(1): 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Saul, Honigberg and Kedar Purnapatre, Signal pathway integration in the switch from the mitotic cell cycle to meiosis in yeast, J. Cell Sci., 2003, 116(11): 2137–2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Chu, J. DeRisi, M. Eisen, et al., The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast, Science, 1998, 282(5389): 699–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    I. Xenarios, L. Salwinski, X. Q. J. Duan, et al., The database of interacting proteins: A research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions, Nucl. Acids Res., 2002, 30(1): 303–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Barrett, T. O. Suzek, D. B. Troup, et al., Ncbi geo: Mining millions of expression profiles-database and tools, Nucl. Acids Res., 2005, 33(Suppl 1): 562–566.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    F. Banuett, Signalling in the yeasts: An informational cascade with links to the filamentous fungi, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 1998, 62(2): 249–274.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Maere, K. Heymans, and M. Kuiper, Bingo: A cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks, Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(16): 3448–3449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    P. Shannon, A. Markiel, O. Ozier, et al., Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks, Genome Res., 2003, 13(11): 2498–2504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Ashburner, C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake, et al., Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology, Nat Genet, 2000, 25(1): 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Z. D. Tu, L. Wang, M. N. Arbeitman, et al., An integrative approach for causal gene identification and gene regulatory pathway inference, Bioinformatics, 2006, 22(14): 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. R. Lockhart and B. C. Rymond, Commitment of yeast pre-mRNA to the splicing pathway requires a novel U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide, Prp39p, Mol. Cell. Biol., 1994, 14(6): 3623–3633.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Systems Science, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Applied Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations