Advertisement

Fostering college students’ design thinking in a knowledge-building environment

  • Pei-Yi Lin
  • Huang-Yao HongEmail author
  • Ching Sing Chai
Research Article
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Knowledge building is an innovative pedagogy aiming to transform students into expert-like knowledge workers. The purpose of this study was to foster teacher-education students’ design performance (i.e., observation, synthesis, ideation and prototypes) in a knowledge-building environment. The participants were 38 college students from a Taiwanese university. They were randomly assigned to eight groups. Each group used the Knowledge Forum—a computer-supported collaborative knowledge-building environment—to develop and discuss the design products of their choice. Data analysis focused on the groups’ online knowledge-building activities, online design thinking processes, and the relationship between them. In general, knowledge-building activities facilitated students’ design thinking. Specifically, we considered the extent to which student groups’ sustained online engagement and increased knowledge had a major impact on their design performance. Ways of applying knowledge-building principles to foster effective design processes are discussed.

Keywords

Design thinking Knowledge building Knowledge forum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We own special thanks to the students for their participation in this study and the research opportunities enabled by their work.

Funding

Support for writing this article was provided, in part, from Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan, grants MOST 104-2511-S-004-001-MY3 & MOST 106-2511-S-004-008-MY2. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author only and do not reflect the opinions of the MOST.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., … & Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. New York: Longman Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. D. Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. V. Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 73–78). Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  4. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age: Design-centered models of teaching and instruction. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2, 695–713.Google Scholar
  5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: One concept, two hills to climb. Knowledge creation in education (pp. 35–52). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2017). “Good Moves” in knowledge-creating dialogue. Qwerty-Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 11(2), 12–26.Google Scholar
  7. Beyhl, T., & Giese, H. (2016). Connecting designing and engineering activities III. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 265–290). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Braha, D., & Reich, Y. (2003). Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes. Research in Engineering Design, 14(4), 185–199.Google Scholar
  9. British Design Council (2005). The design process: The ‘double diamond’ design process model. Retrieved from http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/about-design/how-designers-work/the-design-process/.
  10. Broadbent, S., & Gallotti, M. (2015). Collective intelligence: How does it emerge? Nesta, June 2015. Retreived November 21 2016, from https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/collective_intelligence.pdf.
  11. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84–92.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  13. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), 5–21.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37–53.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2016). Schools as knowledge-building organizations: Thirty years of design research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266–288.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Advancing knowledge-building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 345–366.Google Scholar
  17. Cronjé, J. (2006). Paradigms regained: Toward integrating objectivism and constructivism in instructional design and the learning sciences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(4), 387–416.Google Scholar
  18. Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: Results of protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & W. C. Newstetter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education (pp. 79–103). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523.Google Scholar
  20. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.Google Scholar
  21. Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (Eds.). (2016). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners, and classrooms. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Goldman, S., Kabayadondo, Z., Royalty, A., Carroll, M. P., & Roth, B. (2014). Student teams in search of design thinking. Design thinking research (pp. 11–34). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247–298.Google Scholar
  24. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review, 16(3), 235–266.Google Scholar
  25. Hong, H. Y. (2011). Beyond group collaboration: Facilitating an idea-centered view of collaboration through knowledge building in a science class of fifth-graders. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(2), 248–262.Google Scholar
  26. Hong, H. Y., & Chai, C. S. (2017). Principle-based design: Development of adaptive mathematics teaching practices and beliefs in a knowledge building environment. Computers & Education, 115, 38–55.Google Scholar
  27. Hong, H. Y., Chen, B., & Chai, C. S. (2016a). Exploring the development of college students’ epistemic views during their knowledge building activities. Computers & Education, 98, 1–13.Google Scholar
  28. Hong, H. Y., Chen, B., & Chai, C. S. (2016b). Exploring the development of college students’ epistemic views during their knowledge building activities. Computers & Education, 98, 1–13.Google Scholar
  29. Hong, H. Y., & Lin, P. Y. (2019). Elementary students enhancing their understanding of energy-saving through idea-centered collaborative knowledge-building scaffolds and activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 63–83.Google Scholar
  30. Hong, H. Y., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Community knowledge assessment in a knowledge building environment. Computers & Education, 71, 279–288.Google Scholar
  31. Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2015). Fostering sustained idea improvement with principle-based knowledge building analytic tools. Computers & Education, 89, 91–102.Google Scholar
  32. Hong, H. Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613–627.Google Scholar
  33. Hwang, G. J., Shi, Y. R., & Chu, H. C. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 778–789.Google Scholar
  34. Jansen, B. J., Booth, D., & Smith, B. (2009). Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching. Information Processing and Management, 45(6), 643–663.Google Scholar
  35. Kafai, Y. B. (1996). Learning design by making games. In Y. B. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world (pp. 71–96). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Kangas, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2018). Collaborative design work in technology education. In M. J. de Vries (Ed.), Handbook of Technology Education (pp. 597–610). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2013a). Design expert’s participation in elementary students’ collaborative design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 161–178.Google Scholar
  38. Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2013b). Design thinking in elementary students’ collaborative lamp designing process. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 18(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
  39. Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2013c). Figuring the world of designing: Expert participation in elementary classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 425–442.Google Scholar
  40. Kelly, R. (2012). Educating for creativity. Educating for creativity: A global conversation (pp. 1–22). Brush Education: Calgary.Google Scholar
  41. Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306.Google Scholar
  42. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Kolodner, J. L., Gray, J., & Fasse, B. B. (2003). Promoting transfer through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in learning by design classrooms. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3(2), 183–232.Google Scholar
  44. Kolodner, J. L., Owensby, J. N., & Guzdial, M. (2004). Case-based learning aids. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 829–861). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing. Design Studies, 25(4), 351–371.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, E. Y., Chan, C. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 57–87.Google Scholar
  47. Lin, P. Y., Chang, Y. H., Lin, H. T., & Hong, H. Y. (2017). Fostering college students’ creative capacity through computer-supported knowledge building. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(1), 43–56.Google Scholar
  48. Lindberg, T., Meinel, C., & Wagner, R. (2011). Design thinking: A fruitful concept for it development? Design thinking (pp. 3–18). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Lloyd, P. (2013). Embedded creativity: Teaching design thinking via distance education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 749–765.Google Scholar
  50. Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  51. Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2010). Design thinking research. In H. Plattner, et al. (Eds.), Design thinking: understand–improve–apply (pp. 1–11). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and (expanded ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  53. Noweski, C., Scheer, A., Büttner, N., von Thienen, J., Erdmann, J., & Meinel, C. (2012). Towards a paradigm shift in education practice: Developing twenty-first century skills with design thinking. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 71–94). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Paavola, S. (2004). Abduction as a logic and methodology of discovery: The importance of strategies. Foundations of Science, 9(3), 267–283.Google Scholar
  55. Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor—An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535–557.Google Scholar
  56. Plattner, H. (2010). Bootcamp bootleg. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Institute of Design.Google Scholar
  57. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.Google Scholar
  59. Reichertz, J. (2009). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(1), Art. 13.Google Scholar
  60. Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Chen, B., & Halewood, C. (2015). Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 309–336.Google Scholar
  61. Resnick, M. (1996). Distributed Constructionism. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), International Conference on the Learning Sciences: Proceedings of ICLS96, Evanston, IL July 25–27, 1996 (pp. 280–284). Charlottesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  62. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2014). The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  64. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.Google Scholar
  65. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.Google Scholar
  66. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan Reference, USAGoogle Scholar
  67. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 397–417). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education, 17(3), 8–19.Google Scholar
  70. Seidel, V. P., & Fixson, S. K. (2013). Adopting design thinking in novice multidisciplinary teams: The application and limits of design methods and reflexive practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 19–33.Google Scholar
  71. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative designing: technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 109–136.Google Scholar
  72. So, H. J., Seah, L. H., & Toh-Heng, H. L. (2010). Designing collaborative knowledge building environments accessible to all learners: Impacts and design challenges. Computers & Education, 54(2), 479–490.Google Scholar
  73. Stahl, G. (2003). Meaning and interpretation in collaboration. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 (pp. 523–532). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  74. Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 79–90.Google Scholar
  75. Sy, D. (2007). Adapting usability investigations for agile user-centered design. Journal of Usability Studies, 2(3), 112–132.Google Scholar
  76. Taheri, M., & Meinel, C. (2015). Pedagogical evaluation of the design thinking MOOCs. In Proceedings from the 3rd international conference for design education researchers (pp. 469–481).Google Scholar
  77. Taheri, M., Unterholzer, T., & Meinel, C. (2016). Design thinking at scale: A report on best practices of online courses. Design thinking research (pp. 217–235). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  78. Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., Wong, B. K. S., Hong, H. Y., & Tan, S. C. (2013). Positioning design epistemology and its applications in education technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 81–90.Google Scholar
  79. Van Aalst, J. (2006). Rethinking the nature of online work in asynchronous learning networks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 279–288.Google Scholar
  80. Verdú, N., & Sanuy, J. (2014). The role of scaffolding in CSCL in general and in specific environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 337–348.Google Scholar
  81. von Thienen, J., Royalty, A., & Meinel, C. (2017). Design Thinking in Higher Education: How Students become Dedicated Creative Problem Solvers. Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 306–328). IGI Global: Hershey.Google Scholar
  82. Zande, R. V. (2007). Design, form, and function in art education. Art Education, 60(4), 45–51.Google Scholar
  83. Zhang, J., Chen, M. H., Chen, J., & Mico, T. F. (2013). Computer-supported metadiscourse to foster collective progress in knowledge-building communities. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  84. Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.Google Scholar
  85. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Dept. of EducationNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Dept. of Curriculum and InstructionThe Chinese University of Hong KongSha TinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations