Metacognition in covariation reasoning relevant to performance achievement mediated by experiential values in a simulation game
- 26 Downloads
The Chinese proverb “heal a headache by curing the head and heal foot pain by curing the feet” alludes to ineffective work resulting from a lack of covariation in reasoning. Actually, much problem solving relies on the analysis of how two or more factors vary in correlation with another related variant (i.e., covariation reasoning). To further investigate covariation reasoning and its related affective factors, we designed a website called “No Good (NG) Bread” for senior vocational high school students in Taipei who had taken baking courses for 1 year to apply their knowledge in solving baking-related problems. Data collected from 113 participants aged 16 to 17 were validated by confirmatory factor analysis using Visual PLS 1.04 to examine the interrelatedness among metacognition, experiential values, and performance achievement. The examination revealed that metacognition was positively related to hedonic and utilitarian experiential values, which were subsequently positively related to the students’ learning achievements. The results imply that websites can be developed for specialized courses, such as nursing or automobile repair, to develop students’ covariation reasoning for more effective problem solving.
KeywordsExperiential value Human–computer interface Improving classroom teaching Interactive learning environments Metacognition
This work was financially supported by the “Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences” of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There are no conflict of interest involving either of the authors of this paper.
- Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16.Google Scholar
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1997). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Garrett, J. J. (2010). The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the Web and beyond (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.Google Scholar
- Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. (2004). Using SPSS for windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2013). Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
- Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and selfregulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
- Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar