A longitudinal analysis of student participation in a digital collaborative storytelling activity
Despite the positive potential of the online social networking platforms, the longitudinal studies regarding how children participate in digital storytelling communities is still scant in the literature. This study investigated how 26 elementary students participated in a 2-year digital storytelling community mediated by a social network application. By analyzing the students’ weekly responses, social networks, and their language learning performance, the results suggested that their oral reading proficiency improved along with their participation in the long-term activity. It was also found that the community features impacted the students’ sense of engagement in the activity. The feature of the learning community that allows students to team up with partners to complete a story improved their engagement and motivation. The social network analysis found that multiple literacies including multimedia processing, language, and collaboration were all considered by students as important criteria for the partnership to complete the collaborative digital storytelling work. However, such a prolonged collaborative digital storytelling activity also introduced new challenges for those students demonstrating unfavorable collaboration profiles as they needed to learn how to collaborate in order to team up with others. The implications of the findings for educational practice are discussed.
KeywordsSocial network analysis Learning community Digital storytelling Participation Collaboration
This research was partially funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under grant number MOST 106-2511-S-008 -002 -MY3.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Amara, S., Macedo, J., Bendella, F., & Santos, A. (2016). Group formation in mobile computer supported collaborative learning contexts: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 258.Google Scholar
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
- Bower, M. (2015). A typology of Web 2.0 learning technologies. Paper presented at the EDUCAUSE, Indiana Convention Center. http://www.mycota.ca/assets/uploads/documents/General/csd6280.pdf.
- Di Blas, N., Garzotto, F., Paolini, P., & Sabiescu, A. (2009). Digital storytelling as a whole-class learning activity: Lessons from a three-years project. Paper presented at the Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Advances in learning and instruction series. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Inc.Google Scholar
- Fiore, S. M., Rosen, M. A., Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Salas, E., Letsky, M., & Warner, N. (2010). Toward an understanding of macrocognition in teams: Predicting processes in complex collaborative contexts. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52(2), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huang, Y. Y., Liu, C. C., Wang, Y., Tsai, C. C., & Lin, H. M. (2017). Student engagement in long-term collaborative EFL storytelling activities: An analysis of learners with English proficiency differences. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 95–109.Google Scholar
- Kim, S. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 20–35.Google Scholar
- Koelzer, M. L. (2017). Is it just “very fun?” Or does it actually help?: Digital Storytelling in L2 Academic Writing (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at San Antonio).Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2013). PISA 2015: Draft collaborative problem solving framework. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf. Accessed 7 October 2016.
- Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Robin, B. (2006). The Educational Uses of Digital Storytelling. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2006–Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 709–716).Google Scholar
- Roque, R., Rusk, N., & Resnick, M. (2016). Supporting diverse and creative collaboration in the Scratch online community. In Mass Collaboration and Education (pp. 241–256). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Wong, L. H., Chan, T. W., Chen, Z. H., King, R. B., & Wong, S. L. (2015). The IDC theory: Interest and the interest loop. In Workshop proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computers in education (pp. 804–813).Google Scholar
- Yoon, T. (2014). Developing Multimodal Digital Literacy: The Application of Digital Storytelling as a New Avenue for Effective English Learning with EFL Elementary School Students in Korea. (Doctoral Dissertations), University of Massachusetts. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=dissertations_2.
- Yuksel, P., Robin, B., & McNeil, S. (2011). Educational uses of digital storytelling all around the world. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1264–1271). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
- Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M., & Salinas, R. (2005). Dynamic grouping in collaborative learning supported by wireless handhelds. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 149–161.Google Scholar