Advertisement

Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review

  • Brent PhilipsenEmail author
  • Jo Tondeur
  • Natalie Pareja Roblin
  • Silke Vanslambrouck
  • Chang Zhu
Research Article
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

In order to fully realise the potential of online and blended learning (OBL), teacher professional development (TPD) strategies on how to teach in an online or blended learning environment are needed. While many studies examine the effects of TPD strategies, fewer studies target the specific important components of these strategies. This study addresses that gap by conducting a systematic review of qualitative data consisting of 15 articles on TPD that targets OBL. Using a meta-aggregative approach, six different synthesised findings were identified and integrated into a visual framework of the key components of TPD for OBL. These synthesised findings are the base for the action recommendations which present specific and contextualised suggestions. Taken together, the findings can inform in-service teachers and trainers, together with further research and development efforts that are concerned with TPD for OBL.

Keywords

Distance education Online and blended learning Professional development Technological integration 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie (Grant Number 140029).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11423_2019_9645_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Adey, P. (2006). A model for the professional development of teachers of thinking. Teaching Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 49–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2005.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony, G., Hunter, R., & Thompson, Z. (2014). Expansive learning: Lessons from one teacher’s learning journey. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(2), 279–291.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0553-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), 152–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421–439.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, K. (2010). The Clark–Kozma debate in the 21st century. Heritage matters: Inspiring tomorrow: Proceedings from CNIE Conference. Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boelens, R., Van Laer, S., De Wever, B., & Eelen, J. (2015). Blended learning in adult education: Towards a definition of blended learning. Project report. Adult Learners Online. Retrieved August, 2015, from http://www.iwt-alo.be/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/01-Project-report-Blended-learning-in-adult-education-towards-a-definition-of-blended-learning.pdf.
  9. Catalano, H. (2014). The oppportunity of blended-learning training programs in adult education: Ascertaining study. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 762–768.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.612.Google Scholar
  10. Chikasanda, V. K., Otrel-Cass, K., Williams, J., & Jones, A. (2013). Enhancing teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge and practices: A professional development model for technology teachers in Malawi. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 597–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Comas-Quinn, A. (2011). Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: An exploration of teachers’ experiences in a blended learning course. ReCALL, 23(3), 218–232.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Consuegra, E., & Engels, N. (2016). Effects of professional development on teachers’ gendered feedback patterns, students’ misbehaviour and students’ sense of equity: Results from a one year-quasi-experimental study. British Educational Research Journal, 42(5), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjer.3238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. (2001). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and ALN. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). Maui: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
  14. Cowan, P. (2013). The 4I model for scaffolding the professional development of experienced teachers in the use of virtual learning environments for classroom teaching. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 82–98.Google Scholar
  15. Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desimone, L., & Garet, M. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society and Education, 7(3), 252–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319–346.  https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.3.d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehlers, U. D. (2009) Understanding quality culture. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(4), 343–363.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910992322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ernest, P., Guitert Catasús, M., Hampel, R., Heiser, S., Hopkins, J., Murphy, L., et al. (2013). Online teacher development: Collaborating in a virtual learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(4), 311–333.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.667814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans, L. (2014). Leadership for professional development: Enhancing our understanding of how teachers develop. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(2), 179–198.  https://doi.org/10.1018/03057X.2013.860083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gast, I., Schildkamp, K., & van der Veen, J. T. (2017). Team-based professional development interventions in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 736–767.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317704306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glava, C. S., & Glava, A. E. (2010). Teaching skills training through e-learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1752–1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gregory, J., & Salmon, G. (2013). Professional development for online university teaching. Distance Education, 34(3), 256–270.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  26. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.  https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guskey, T. (2003). What makes professional development effective. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hallas, J. (2006). Professional development for online teaching practices. In Markauskaite, L., Goodyear, P., & Reimann, P. (Eds.), Who’s learning? Whose technology? Proceedings of the ascilite conference (pp. 303–311). Sydney.Google Scholar
  29. Ham, V., & Davey, R. (2005). Our first time: Two higher education tutors reflect on becoming a ‘virtual teacher’. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(3), 257–264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500168017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hammersley, M. (2001). On ‘systematic’ reviews of research literatures: A ‘narrative’ response to Evans and Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hannes, K. (2010). Het qualitative assessment and review instrument (QARI) ter ondersteuning van synthesen van kwalitatief onderzoek. KWALON, 15(3), 35–44.Google Scholar
  32. Hannes, K., & Lockwood, C. (2011). Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(7), 1632–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hannes, K., Raes, E., Vangenechten, K., Heyvaert, M., & Dochy, F. (2013). Experiences from employees with team learning in a vocational learning or work setting: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Research Review, 10, 116–132.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108327554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hwang, Y.-S., Bartlett, B., Greben, M., & Hand, K. (2017). A systematic review of mindfulness interventions for in-service teachers: A tool to enhance teacher wellbeing and performance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 26–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joanna Briggs Institute. (2014). Joanna Briggs institute reviewers’ manual (2014th ed.). Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute.Google Scholar
  36. Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Korthagen, F. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 77–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate2003.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kurilovas, E., Dvareckiené, V., Jevsikova, T. (2016). Augmented Reality-Based Learning Systems: Personalisation Framework. In J. Novotná, & A. Jancarik (Eds.) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on E-learning, (pp. 391–398). Prague: Charles University, Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.Google Scholar
  39. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porrit, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187.  https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacDonald, J., & Campbell, A. (2012). Demonstrating online teaching in the disciplines. A systematic approach to activity design for online synchronous tuition. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 883–891.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01238.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McQuiggan, C. A. (2007). The role of faculty development in online teaching’s potential to question teaching beliefs and assumptions. Resource document. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Retrieved August, 2015, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall103/mcquiggan103.htm.
  43. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–47.Google Scholar
  44. Meloncon, L. (2007). Exploring electronic landscapes: Technical communication, online learning, and instructor preparedness. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Nihuka, K., & Voogt, J. (2012). Collaborative e-learning course design: Impacts on instructors in the Open University of Tanzania. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 232–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. California, Thousand Oaks: SageGoogle Scholar
  48. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwel Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Voet, T., Sijnave, B., Gemmel, P., Duyck, W., et al. (2013). Assessing hospital physicians’ acceptance of clinical information systems: A review of the relevant Literature. Psychologica Belgica, 53(2), 15–31.  https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-53-2-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Redmond, P. (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown, & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands, changing directions. Proceedings of the ascilite conference (pp. 1050–1060). Hobart Tasmania, Australia.Google Scholar
  51. Richardson, J. C., & Alsup, J. (2015). From the classroom to the keyboard: How seven teachers created their online teacher identities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 142–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development. 65(3), 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Sherin, M. G., & Russ, R. S. (2014). Teacher noticing via video: The role of interpretive frames. In Digital video for teacher education: Research and practice (pp. 3–20). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  55. Spolaôr, N., & Vavassori Benitti, F. (2017). Robotics applications grounded in learning theories on tertiary education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 112, 97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stavredes, T. (2011). Effective online teaching: Foundations and strategies for student success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  57. Stein, S. J., Shephard, K., & Harris, I. (2011). Conceptions of e-learning and professional development for e-learning held by tertiary educators in New-Zealand. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 145–165.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00997.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tschida, C., Hodge, E., & Schmidt, S. (2016). Learning to teach online: Negotiating issues of platform, pedagogy and professional development. In V. Wang (Ed.), Handbook of research on learning outcomes and opportunities in the digital age (pp. 664–684). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Veen, K., Zwart, R. C., Meirink, J. A., & Verloop, N. (2010). Professionele ontwikkeling van leraren: een reviewstudie naar effectieve kenmerken van professionaliseringsinterventies van leraren. ICLON.Google Scholar
  60. Wang, Y., Chen, N.-S., & Levy, M. (2010). Teacher training in a synchronous cyber face-to-face classroom: Characterizing and supporting the online teachers’ learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 277–293.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.493523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson, A. (2012). Effective professional development for e-learning: What do the managers think? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 829–900.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01248.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson, G., & Stacey, E. (2003). Online interaction impacts on learning: Teaching the teachers to teach online. In G. T. Crisp, I. Scholten, S. Barker, & J. Baron (Eds.), Interact, integrate, impact: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education., (pp. 541–551), Adelaide, 7–10 December 2003.Google Scholar
  64. Wolf, P. D. (2006). Best practices in the training of faculty to teach online. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 17(2), 47–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brent Philipsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jo Tondeur
    • 2
    • 3
  • Natalie Pareja Roblin
    • 4
  • Silke Vanslambrouck
    • 1
  • Chang Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational SciencesVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Interfaculty Department of Teacher EducationVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Educational StudiesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  4. 4.Amsterdam University of Applied SciencesAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations