Advertisement

Behavior, perceptions and learning experience of undergraduates using social technologies during internship

  • Samuel K. W. Chu
  • Sri Devi RavanaEmail author
  • Sanny S. W. Mok
  • Randolph C. H. Chan
Research Article

Abstract

Social technologies such as social networking sites, Wikis and blogs have gained popularity not only in social communication but also in other areas, such as in enhancing learning experience among students in tertiary education. This study investigated how blogs and Facebook scaffolded students’ learning during their internships in tertiary education. A mix-method approach was employed to examine students’ perceptions of blogs and Facebook in improving their internship learning experience. The results showed that blogs and Facebook encouraged students and facilitated their engagement in problem solving, information sharing and knowledge construction during their internships. In particular, Facebook showed more promising results, assisting students in reflecting on their experiences. Moreover, students acknowledged that Facebook was a better platform for online interaction and collaborative learning than blogs. This study provides empirical evidence for the use of social media tools in pedagogical scaffolding and collaborative learning during internships.

Keywords

Scaffolding Collaborative learning Social technologies Blogs Facebook Internships 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by University of Malaya Research Grant Programme (UMRG Grant No.: RP059A-17SBS).

Supplementary material

11423_2018_9638_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 kb)

References

  1. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 71–80.Google Scholar
  2. Angelaina, S., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2012). Analysing students’ engagement and learning presence in an educational blog community. Educational Media International, 49(3), 183–200.Google Scholar
  3. Baecher, L., & McCormack, B. (2015). The impact of video review on supervisory conferencing. Language and Education, 29(2), 153–173.Google Scholar
  4. Balakrishnan, V., & Gan, C. L. (2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 808–821.Google Scholar
  5. Balcikanli, C. (2015). Prospective english language teachers’ experiences in Facebook: Adoption, use and educational use in Turkish context. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 11(3), 82–99.Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Blood, R. (2002). The weblog handbook: Practical advice on creating and maintaining your blog. USA: Perseus Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.Google Scholar
  9. Bukaliya, R. (2012). The potential benefits and challenges of internship programmes in an ODL institution: A case for the Zimbabwe Open University. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3(1), 118–133.Google Scholar
  10. Burgess, J. E. (2006). Blogging to learn, learning to blog. In A. Bruns & J. S. Jacobs (Eds.), Uses of blogs. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Cardus, J. (2006). The power of the collective. E.learning Age, 10–11.Google Scholar
  12. Carter, C. A. (2008). The Panhellenic project: Assessing learning engagement using Web 2.0 technologies. Malibu: Pepperdine University.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, Y. F. (2015). See you on Facebook: exploring influences on Facebook continous usage. Behavious & Information Technology, 33(11), 1208–1218.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 87–104.Google Scholar
  15. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.Google Scholar
  16. Chu, S. K., Chan, C. K., & Tiwari, A. F. (2012a). Using blogs to support learning during internship. Computers & Education, 58, 989–1000.Google Scholar
  17. Chu, S. K.-W., & Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Using online collaborative tools for groups to co-construct knowledge. Online Information Review, 35, 581–597.Google Scholar
  18. Chu, S. K., Kwan, A. C., & Warning, P. (2012b). Blogging for information management, learning, and social support during internship. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15, 168–178.Google Scholar
  19. Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 605–616.Google Scholar
  20. Churchill, D. (2007). Web 2.0 and possibilities for educational applications. Educational Technology, 47, 24–29.Google Scholar
  21. Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 179–183.Google Scholar
  22. Ciampa, K., & Gallagher, T. L. (2015). Blogging to enhance in-service teachers’ professional learning and development during collaborative inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 883–913.Google Scholar
  23. Clingerman, T. L., & Bernard, J. M. (2011). An investigation of the use of e-mail as a supplemental modality for clinical supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44(2), 82–95.Google Scholar
  24. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  25. Dale, C., & Pymm, J. M. (2009). Podagogy The iPod as a learning technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10, 84–96.Google Scholar
  26. Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56, 441–451.Google Scholar
  27. Du, H. S., & Wagner, C. (2007). Learning with weblogs: Enhancing cognitive and social knowledge construction. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50, 1–16.Google Scholar
  28. Duarte, P. (2015). The use of a group blog to actively support learning activities. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(2), 103–117.Google Scholar
  29. Ellison, N., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17, 99–122.Google Scholar
  30. Farmer, B., Yue, A., & Brooks, C. (2008). Using blogging for higher order learning in large cohort university teaching: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 123–136.Google Scholar
  31. Ferguson, J. L., Makarem, S. C., & Jones, R. E. (2016). Using a class blog for student experiential learning reflection in business courses. Journal of Education for Business, 91(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  32. Flatley, M. E. (2005). Blogging for enhanced teaching and learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 68, 77–80.Google Scholar
  33. Forgey, M. A., Loughran, H., & Hansen, J. (2013). Utilizing video conferencing to introduce an international perspective to foundation practice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33, 449–466.Google Scholar
  34. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gan, C. L., & Balakrishnan, V. (2016). An empirical study of factors affecting mobile wireless technology adoption for promoting interactive lectures in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.  https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i1.2111.Google Scholar
  36. Group Features. (n.d.). Help Center [Facebook page]. Retrieved April 2, 20 2015 from https://www.facebook.com/help/265435626889287/.
  37. Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., & Spence, M. (2010). To blog or not to blog: Student perceptions of blog effectiveness for learning in a college-level course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 206–213.Google Scholar
  38. Hamid, S., Chang, S. & Kurnia, S. (2009). Identifying the use of online social networking in higher education. Proceedings ascilite Auckland, 2009 Conference: 26th Annual ascilite International Conference (pp. 419–422). Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  39. Hamid, S., Chang, S., Waycott, J. & Kurnia, S. (2012). A systematic appropriation of social technologies for educational activities: Empirical study of Australian lecturers. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems: 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–11). Seattle, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1–9.Google Scholar
  41. Harran, M., & Olamijulo, C. (2014). Social media communication spaces to develop literacies in a higher education language classroom context. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(2), 410–435.Google Scholar
  42. Hemmi, A., Bayne, S., & Land, R. (2009). The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 19–30.Google Scholar
  43. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41, 397–420.Google Scholar
  44. Huang, W. D., Yoo, S. J. & Choi, J. H. (2008). Correlating college students’ learning styles and how they use Web 2.0 applications for learning. In C. Bonk et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2752–2759). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  45. Huann, T. Y., John, O. E. G. & Yuen, J. (2005). WEblogs in education. Educational Technology Division, Ministry of Education, Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.edublog.net/files/papers/weblogs%20in%20education.pdf.
  46. Johnston, K., Chen, M. M., & Hauman, M. (2013a). Use, perception and attitude of university students towards Facebook and Twitter. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 16(3), 201–211.Google Scholar
  47. Johnston, K., Tanner, M., & Laila, N. (2013b). Social capital: The benefit of Facebook ‘friends’. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(1), 24–36.Google Scholar
  48. Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119–132.Google Scholar
  49. Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 179–187.Google Scholar
  50. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
  51. Koc, I. (2012). Preservice science teachers reflect on their practicum experiences. Educational Studies, 38(1), 31–38.Google Scholar
  52. Lampe, C., Ellison, N.B. & Steinfield, C. (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. Proceedings of the, 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 721–730). California, USA.Google Scholar
  53. Land, R. & Bayne, S. (2008). Social technologies in higher education: Authorship, subjectivity and temporality. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on networked learning: Networked Learning Conference, 2008 (pp. 675–681). Halkidiki, Greece.Google Scholar
  54. Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Student assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 57–87.Google Scholar
  55. Lloyd, S., & Bristol, S. (2006). Modelling mentorship and collaboration for BSN and MSN students in a community clinical practicum. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(4), 129–132.Google Scholar
  56. Maloney, E. (2007). What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(18), B26.Google Scholar
  57. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Murray-Harvey, R. (2001). How teacher education students cope with practicum concerns. The Teacher Educator, 37(2), 117–133.Google Scholar
  59. Murray-Harvey, R., Slee, P. T., Lawson, M. J., Silins, H., Banfield, G., & Russell, A. (2010). Under stress: The concerns and coping strategies of teacher education students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 19–35.Google Scholar
  60. Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. Reading Teacher, 39, 564–570.Google Scholar
  61. Parr, G., & Chan, J. (2015). Identity work in a dialogic international teaching practicum. Teaching Education, 26(1), 38–54.Google Scholar
  62. Perez, J. B. P. (2000). Participation, interaction and meaning construction in a university-level course using a computer bulletin board as a supplement to regular class discussions: A case study. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  63. Popescu, E. (2014). Providing collaborative learning support with social media in an integrated environment. World Wide Web, 17, 199–212.Google Scholar
  64. Prescott, J., Wilson, S., & Becket, G. (2015). Facebook use in the learning environment: Do students want this? Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 345–350.Google Scholar
  65. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83.Google Scholar
  66. Rocca, C. L., Margottini, M., & Capobianco, R. (2014). Collaborative learning in higher education. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 61–66.Google Scholar
  67. Rose, C. (2011). The security implications of ubiquitous social media. International Journal of Management and Information Systems, 15(1), 35.Google Scholar
  68. Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning-a critical review. Paper for CERI-KERIS International Expert Meeting on ICT and Educational Performance (pp. 16–17).Google Scholar
  69. Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 157–174.Google Scholar
  70. Tang, E., & Lam, C. (2014). Building an effective online learning community (OLC) in blog-based teaching portfolios. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 79–85.Google Scholar
  71. Tay, E., & Allen, M. (2011). Designing social media into university learning: Technology of collaboration or collaboration for technology? Educational Media International, 48, 151–163.Google Scholar
  72. van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259–287.Google Scholar
  73. Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 428–438.Google Scholar
  74. Warren, P. (2008). Inside internships. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 4(1), 117–123.Google Scholar
  75. Weible, R. (2010). Are universities reaping the available benefits internship programs offer? Journal of Education for Business, 85, 59–63.Google Scholar
  76. Whittaker, A. L., Howarth, G. S., & Lymn, K. A. (2014). Evaluation of Facebook© to create an online learning community in an undergraduate animal science class. Educational Media International, 51(2), 135–145.Google Scholar
  77. Wiley, C., & Sisson, M. (2006). Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The use of Facebook by students and employers. Dayton, OH: Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education Special Topics Forum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel K. W. Chu
    • 1
  • Sri Devi Ravana
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sanny S. W. Mok
    • 1
  • Randolph C. H. Chan
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computer Science & Information TechnologyUniversity of MalayaKula LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Special Education and CounselingThe Education University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations