Advertisement

TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change

  • Joyce Hwee Ling KohEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Many empirical studies show that teachers have difficulty designing technology-integrated lessons for student-centered learning. Supporting teachers to change their pedagogical practice is a challenge faced in teacher professional development for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). This study describes how teachers’ conceptions of pedagogical change can be supported through the use of different kinds of TPACK design scaffolds—a meaningful learning rubric, lesson design heuristics and TPACK Activity Types. The impact of these design scaffolds on the TPACK confidence and lesson design confidence of 47 teachers and instructors who were attending a graduate course in educational technology were assessed through pre and post course surveys. Expert ratings of technology-integrated lesson plans designed at the beginning and end of the course were also used to determine the extent of pedagogical change enacted. It was found that these design scaffolds had positive effects on teachers’ TPACK confidence and were useful for helping the teachers to articulate pedagogical change in their lesson designs. Participants’ feedback for improving the TPACK design scaffolds as well as guidelines for using these to support pedagogical change through TPACK professional development programmes are discussed.

Keywords

TPACK Pedagogical change Technological pedagogical content knowledge Teacher education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on data collected in research project Developing teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for 21st Century Learning (TPACK-21CL) Through Design Thinking (OER5/13/KHL), funded by the Education Research Funding Programme, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. The views expressed in this paper are the authors’ and do not necessarily represent the views of NIE.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. AACTE. (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Christodoulou, A. (2016). Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (pp. 11–33).Google Scholar
  4. Blau, I., Peled, Y., & Nusan, A. (2014). Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge in one-to-one classroom: Teachers developing “digital wisdom”. Interactive Learning Environments, 13, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.978792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boschman, F., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2015). Exploring teachers’ use of TPACK in design talk: The collaborative design of technology-rich early literacy activities. Computers & Education, 82, 250–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Ho, H. N., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Examining preservice teachers’ perceived knowledge of TPACK and cyberwellness through structural equation modeling. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1000–1019.  https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Teo, Y. H. (2018). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117752453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Education Technology and Society, 16(2), 31–51.Google Scholar
  9. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. W. L. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cogill, J. (2010). A model of pedagogical change for the evaluation of interactive whiteboard practice. In M. Thomas & E. C. Schmid (Eds.), Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory, research and practice (pp. 162–178). PA, USA: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in Practice: Using and elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analye and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doering, A., Koseoglu, S., Scharber, C., Henrickson, J., & Lanegran, D. (2014). Technology integration in K–12 geography education using TPACK as a conceptual model. Journal of Geography, 113(6), 223–237.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.896393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao, P., Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., & Wu, J. (2009). Developing a better understanding of technology based pedagogy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 714–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris, J. B. (2016). Inservice teachers’ TPACK development: Trends, models, and trajectories. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knoweldge (TPACK) for educators (2nd ed., pp. 191–206). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Harris, J. B., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. J. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In C. D. Maddux, D. Gibson, & B. Dodge (Eds.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2010 (pp. 323–331). USA: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. (2012). Learning activity types wiki. Retrieved from http://activitytypes.wmwikis.net/.
  21. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. A. H. Stevenson & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  22. Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49(2), 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heitink, M., Fisser, P., Verplanken, L., & van Braak, J. (2017). Eliciting teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 96–109.  https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herring, M. C., Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2016). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary MA Ed program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D., & Marra, R. M. (2013). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Higher Education.Google Scholar
  27. Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Figg, C. (2015). A case study of a TPACK-based approach to teacher professional development: Teaching science with blogs. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 161–200.Google Scholar
  28. Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric to analyze teachers’ conceptions of meaningful learning in ICT lesson planning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900.  https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2016). Seven design frames that teachers use when considering technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 102, 244–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Huang, Y. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Exploring the relationship between pre-service teachers’ perceptions of efficacy for technological pedagogical content knowledge and efficacy for ICT design thinking. Paper presented at the AECT International Conference on the Frontier in e-Learning Research Taichung, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  33. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lim, W. Y. (2017). Teacher professional development for TPACK-21CL Effects on teacher ICT integration and student outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 172–196.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: the design process demystified. Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  37. Le Fevre, D. M. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers’ perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00774.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher lnowledge. Teachers’ College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Niess, M. L. (2007). Developing teacher’s TPCK for teaching mathematics with spreadsheets. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 18(4), 2238–2245.Google Scholar
  41. Player-Koro, C. (2013). Hype, hope and ICT in teacher education: A Bernsteinian perspective. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(1), 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodriguez, A. J. (2004). Teachers’ resistance to ideological and pedagogical change: Definitions, theoretical framework, and significance. In Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms (pp. 17–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in secondary-school english, mathematics and science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44(3), 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Somekh, B. (2007). Pedagogy and learning with ICT: Researching the art of innovation. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tai, S.-J. D. (2015). From TPACK-in-action workshops to classrooms: CALL competency developed and integrated. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 139–164.Google Scholar
  47. Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “third”-order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 1057–1060.  https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Uluyol, Ç., & Şahin, S. (2016). Elementary school teachers’ ICT use in the classroom and their motivators for using ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker, A., Recker, M., Ye, L., Robertshaw, M. B., Sellers, L., & Leary, H. (2012). Comparing technology-related teacher professional development designs: A multilevel study of teacher and student impacts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(3), 421–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward, L., & Parr, J. M. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers & Education, 54(1), 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations