Improving primary students’ collaborative problem solving competency in project-based science learning with productive failure instructional design in a seamless learning environment
The paper reports on an empirical study adopting a mixed research method, aiming at improving primary students’ collaborative problem solving competency in project-based learning with productive failure (PF) instructional design in a seamless learning environment. Two Grade Six classes participated in a project-based learning of “Plant Adaptations”. In Class 1 with 27 students, the project-based learning was conducted with PF instructional design; in Class 2 with 26 students, the project-based learning was conducted without PF instructional design. The learning activities spanned across farm, class, home and online spaces supported by mobile devices. Data collection includes various students’ created artifacts in groups in the inquiry process, student reflections, student focus group interviews and pre- and post-domain tests. Both qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods were employed. The research findings show that compared to Class 2, the students in Class 1 gained deeper understanding of conceptual knowledge and produced better group artifacts in collaborative problem-solving quality than those in Class 2; and the students in Class 1 were more positive in facing the challenges in their project-based learning process, and developed a sense of ownership of their learning. The findings imply that PF instructional design is conducive to developing primary students’ collaborative solving competency in science learning in a seamless learning environment.
KeywordsScience learning Collaborative problem solving Project-based learning Productive-failure Seamless learning
This study was funded by The Education University of Hong Kong under Dean’s Research Fund BFRS-1/4th round (2016-18).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, advances in learning and instruction series. New York: Elsevier Science Inc.Google Scholar
- Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 37–56). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Khaddage, F., Müller, W., & Flintoff, K. (2016). Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via mobile app technology: Where to from here, and how? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 16.Google Scholar
- Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. (2006). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing (Draft PADI Technical Report 17). Menlo Park: SRI International.Google Scholar
- PISA. (2017). PISA 2015 collaborative problem-solving framework. Retrieved from goo.gl/Yp6j8LGoogle Scholar
- Song, Y., & Kapur, M. (2017). How to flip the classroom- “productive failure or traditional flipped classroom” pedagogical design? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 292.Google Scholar
- The Fourth Strategy on IT in Education. (2014). Realising IT potential and unleashing learning power—A holistic approach. Retrieved from goo.gl/VVgQJf.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.Google Scholar