Advertisement

Mathematical problem solving and learning in an architecture-themed epistemic game

  • Fengfeng KeEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

This mixed methods study is aimed to examine the feasibility of integrating mathematical problem solving with architectural design via a 3D epistemic simulation game to promote active mathematics learning for middle-school students. The experimental-control pretest/posttest group design was adopted to examine whether the experience of interacting with an architecture simulation game would improve students’ math knowledge for and performance of problem solving. Data were collected from 61 6th graders via both quantitative and qualitative methods, including math problem-solving and mental rotation tests, video- and screen-capture of game play behaviors, observation, as well as game logs. The study results indicated that the gaming group performed significantly better than the non-gaming control group in the math context problem solving test. The infield observation and participants’ gaming behavior analysis suggested that the learning and practice of mathematical problem solving during gaming is a cognizant and planned endeavor framed by carefully designed game actions and objects.

Keywords

Digital game-based learning Realistic mathematics Learning by making Problem solving Simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. 1318784. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM, 45(6), 797–810.Google Scholar
  2. Bagley, E. & Shaffer, D. W. (2010). The epistemography or urban and regional planning 912: Appropriation in the face of resistance. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  3. Bai, H., Pan, W., Hirumi, A., & Kebritchi, M. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of a 3-D instructional game on improving mathematics achievement and motivation of middle school students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 993–1003.Google Scholar
  4. Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play: Using games to position person, content, and context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525–536.Google Scholar
  5. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–108.Google Scholar
  6. Baroody, A. J. (2003). Expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 1–36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Bruce, C. D., & Hawes, Z. (2015). The role of 2D and 3D mental rotation in mathematics for young children: What is it? Why does it matter? And what can we do about it? ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 331–343.Google Scholar
  8. Cetina, K. K. (2009). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122.Google Scholar
  10. Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1982). The mathematical experience. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. De Lisi, R., & Cammarano, D. M. (1996). Computer experience and gender differences in undergraduate mental rotation performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(3), 351–361.Google Scholar
  13. De Lisi, R., & Wolford, J. L. (2002). Improving children’s mental rotation accuracy with computer game playing. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(3), 272–282.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31, 121–127.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature (Vol. 1). Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
  16. Divjak, B., & Tomić, D. (2011). The impact of game-based learning on the achievement of learning goals and motivation for learning mathematics-literature review. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 35(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
  17. Eriksson, I., & Lindberg, V. (2016). Enriching ‘learning activity’ with ‘epistemic practices’–enhancing students’ epistemic agency and authority. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy.  https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.32432.Google Scholar
  18. Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18(10), 850–855.Google Scholar
  19. Fitzgerald, J. F. (1996). Proof in mathematics education. Journal of Education, 178(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
  20. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66–78.Google Scholar
  23. Hatfield, D., & Shaffer, D. W. (2010). The epistemography of journalism 335: Complexity in developing journalistic expertise. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  24. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., et al. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.Google Scholar
  26. Jurow, A. S. (2005). Shifting engagements in figured worlds: Middle school mathematics students’ participation in an architectural design project. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 35–67.Google Scholar
  27. Kafai, Y. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Ke, F. (2008). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: Cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation and interpretation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 539–556.Google Scholar
  29. Ke, F. (2016). Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 219–244.Google Scholar
  30. Ke, F., & Clark, K. M. (2018). Game-based multimodal representations and mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9938-3.Google Scholar
  31. Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427–443.Google Scholar
  32. Kinach, B. M. (2012). Fostering spatial vs. metric understanding in geometry. The Mathematics Teacher, 105(7), 534–540.Google Scholar
  33. Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward: Obstacles, opportunities, & openness. Boston: The Education Arcade. Retrieved from http://education.mit.edu/papers/MovingLearningGamesForward_EdArcade.pdf.
  34. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, C. Y., & Chen, M. P. (2009). A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: The effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge. Computers & Education, 52(3), 530–542.Google Scholar
  36. McLaren, B. M., Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Forlizzi, J. (2017). A computer-based game that promotes mathematics learning more than a conventional approach. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 7(1), 36–56.Google Scholar
  37. National Research Council. [NRC]. (2011). Learning Science through Computer Games and Simulations. Committee on Science Learning: Computer Games, Simulations, and Education. In M. A. Honey & M. L. Hilton (Eds.), Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  38. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). PISA 2012 Results (Volume V): Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems, OECD Publishing, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208070-en. Retried from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2012-results-creative-problem-solving-volume-v/executive-summary_9789264208070-3-en.
  39. Plass, J. L., Okeefe, P. A., Homer, B. D., Case, J., Hayward, E. O., Stein, M., et al. (2013). The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1050–1066.Google Scholar
  40. Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50–58.Google Scholar
  41. Quaiser-Pohl, C., Geiser, C., & Lehmann, W. (2006). The relationship between computer-game preference, gender, and mental-rotation ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(3), 609–619.Google Scholar
  42. Shaffer, D. W. (2004). Pedagogical praxis: The professions as models for postindustrial education. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1401–1421.Google Scholar
  43. Shaffer, D. W. (2005). Epistemic games. Innovate, 1(6). Retrieved April 2008, from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol1_issue6/Epistemic_Games.pdf.
  44. Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 46(3), 223–234.Google Scholar
  45. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.Google Scholar
  46. Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., & Ke, F. (2015). The power of play: The effects of Portal 2 and Lumosity on cognitive and noncognitive skills. Computers & Education, 80, 58–67.Google Scholar
  47. Squire, K. D. (2003). Gameplay in context: Learning through participation in communities of civilization III players. Unpublished PhD thesis. Instructional Systems Technology Department, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  48. Svarovsky, G. N. (2009). Unpacking the digital zoo: An analysis of the learning processes within an engineering epistemic game, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Retrieved from http://epistemicgames.org/eg/wp-content/uploads/svarovsky-dissertation-revision-v26.pdf.
  49. Taylor, A. (2009). Linking architecture and education: Sustainable design of learning environments. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  50. Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 996–1013.Google Scholar
  51. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000). Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guided tour. Freudenthal Institute Cd-rom for ICME9. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  52. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Psychology and Learning SystemsFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations