Knowledge typologies for professional learning: educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice
- 646 Downloads
Open education resources (OER) and accompanying open education practices (OEP), are changing the education landscape. For educators to take full advantage of the opportunities OER offer they must engage in learning activities to facilitate the extension and adaption of their practice. This paper forms part of a larger study exploring how adult educators learn from and through their engagement with OER in the contexts of their work. Following a quantitative investigation of the learning behaviours of 521 educators around OER use, follow up interviews were conducted with 30 participants. The interviews explore in greater detail the ways knowledge is being (re)generated and used by the educators as they learn new practices with and through OER. Six broad knowledge types were identified as supporting the expansion of practice. The data suggest educators not only require multiple types of knowledge, but also must be able to move fluidly among these different types of knowledge.
KeywordsOpen education resources (OER) Open education practice (OEP) Professional learning Knowledge building Higher education
This study was conducted as part of the Erasmus + ExplOERer Project, funded by Erasmus Plus Programme, KA2 Strategic Partnerships (European Commission, Contract Number 2014-1-SE01-KA200-000994).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Atkins, D., Seely Brown, J., & Hammond, A. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities (William and Flora Hewlett Foundation report). Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf.
- Banzato, M. (2012). A case study of teachers’ open educational practices. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 8(3), 153–163.Google Scholar
- Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546.Google Scholar
- Beetham, H., Falconer, I., McGill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2012). Open practices: Briefing paper (JISC briefing paper). Retrieved from https://oersynth.pbworks.com/w/page/51668352/OpenPracticesBriefing.
- Bentley, T. (2012). Learning beyond the classroom: Education for a changing world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1995). Expanding a teacher’s knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Caswell, T., Heson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open education resources: Enabling universal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
- Conole, G., & Ehlers, U. (2010). Open educational practices: Unleashing the power of OER. Paper presented to UNESCO Workshop on OER in Namibia 2010, Windhoek. Retrieved from http://efquel.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/OEP_Unleashing-the-power-of-OER.pdf.
- CTOED (2008). Cape Town open education declaration: Unlocking the promise of open educational resources. Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read-the-declaration.
- Ecorys & Bertelsmann Stiftung (2015). Adult learners in digital learning environments. European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Ehlers, U. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London & Canberra: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
- Eraut, M., & Hirsch, W. (2007). The significance of workplace learning for individuals and groups and organizations. Skope Monographs, 6. Oxford.Google Scholar
- Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: Integrating organizational and personal development. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 126–144). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Geser, G. (2007). Open education practices and resources (OLCOS Roadmap report). Retrieved from http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf.
- Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2007). From monological and dialogical to trialogical approaches to learning. Paper presented at an international workshop guided construction of knowledge in classrooms, Jerusalem. Retrieved from http://escalate.org.il/construction_knowledge/papers/hakkarainen.pdf.
- Haythornthwaite, C. (2007). Social networks and online community. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, U. Reips, & T. Postmes (Eds.), Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 121–136). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Huberman, M. (1992). Teacher development and instructional mastery. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 122–142). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Illeris, K. (2007). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Kortemeyer, G. (2013). Ten years later: Why open educational resources have not noticeably affected higher education, and why we should care. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/2/ten-years-later-why-open-educational-resources-have-not-noticeably-affected-higher-education-and-why-we-should-care.
- Littlejohn, A. (2003). Issues in reusing online resources. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to eLearning (pp. 1–8). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2014). Reusing resources: Open for learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2014-02/.
- Masterman, L., & Wild, J. (2012). OER Impact Study: Research Report (JISC Open Educational Resources Programme Report). Retrieved from http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614114910/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/oer/JISCOERImpactStudyResearchReportv1-0.pdf.
- McCully, W., Lampe, C., Sarkar, C., Velasquez, A., & Sreevinasan, A. (2011). Online and offline interactions in online communities. Paper presented at WikiSym’11 Conference Mountain View, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Milligan, C., Littljohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2014). Workplace learning in informal networks. Reusing Open Resources: Learning in Open Networks for Work, Life and Education, 93.Google Scholar
- OPAL, (2010). OEP guide: Guidelines for open educational practices in organisations (Vs. 2011). (Open Education Quality Initiative report). Retrieved from http://oerworkshop.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/44605120/OPAL-OEP-guidelines.pdf.
- OPAL. (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus to open educational practices (OPAL report). Essen, Germany: Open Education Quality Initiative.Google Scholar
- Reeves, J. (2010). Adopting a new approach to professional learning. In: Professional learning as relational practice. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Säljö, R. (2012). Literacy, digital literacy and epistemic practices: The co-evolution of hybrid minds and external memory systems. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7(1), 5–19.Google Scholar
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2002). Knowledge building. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of education. New York: Macmillan Reference.Google Scholar
- Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Stacey, P. (2010). Foundation funded OER vs. tax payer funded OER—A tale of two mandates. Paper presented at Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Open Ed Conference, Barcelona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10609/5241.
- Timperley, H. (2013). Learning to practice: A paper for discussion (Ministry of Education report). Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
- Tynjälä, P. (2005). Integrative pedagogies—Learning in real life situations. Paper presented at Enhancing Physiotherapy Competencies in Innovative Learning Environments. European Network of Physiotherapy in Higher Education, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
- Tynjälä, P. (2007). Connectivity and transformation in work-related learning: Theoretical foundations. In M. L. Stenstrom & P. Tynjälä (Eds.), Towards integration of work and learning: Strategies for connectivity and transformation (pp. 11–37). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries (final UNESCO report). Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.phpURL_ID=5303&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
- Unwin, L., Felstead, A., & Fuller, A. (2004). Learning at Work: Towards more Expansive Opportunities. Paper presented at NIACE Commission of Inquiry into ‘The Future for Lifelong Learning’, London. Retrieved from http://www.niace.org.uk/lifelonglearninginquiry/docs/Workplace-Lorna-Unwin.pdf.
- Wild, J. (2012). OER Engagement Study: Promoting OER reuse among academics (SCORE Fellowship report). Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/score/files/score/file/Joanna%20Wild%20SCORE%20Fellowship%20Final%20Report%20-%20web%20version.pdf.
- Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.Google Scholar