Integration of an intelligent tutoring system in a course of computer network design
- 848 Downloads
INTUITEL is a research project aiming to offer a personalized learning environment. The INTUITEL approach includes an Intelligent Tutoring System that gives students recommendations and feedback about what the best learning path is for them according to their profile, learning progress, context and environmental influences. INTUITEL combines efficient pedagogical-based recommendations with freedom of choice and it introduces this tutoring support in different Learning Management Systems. During the INTUITEL project various software and pedagogical testing procedures were defined to provide the development teams with feedback, both summative and formative. The current paper describes the initial user test, which was conducted at the University of Valladolid for the course “Network Design”. The experiment was focused on real learners’ reactions to INTUITEL recommendations received by an INTUITEL-enabled LMS. Nineteen students participated in a two phase testing procedure in order to analyze the learners’ behavior with INTUITEL, as well as obtaining information about how learners perceive the influence and usefulness of the tutoring system in online learning courses. Results show that students with INTUITEL follow learning paths that are more suitable for them. Besides, the general satisfaction level of participants is high. Most learners appreciate INTUITEL, would follow its recommendations and consider the messages shown by INTUITEL as useful and caring.
KeywordsSelf-directed learning Personalized learning Intelligent tutoring systems Adaptive learning Semantic learning models
The authors wish to thank all other INTUITEL partners. The research project INTUITEL leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement No. 318496.
This study was funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (Grant Agreement No. 318496).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Amo, D. (2013). MOOCs: experimental approaches for quality in pedagogical and design fundamentals. In Proceeding of the first international conference on technological ecosystem for enhancing multiculturality (pp. 219–223). ACM.Google Scholar
- Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29.Google Scholar
- Bhuvaneswari, A. S., & Padmanaban, T. (2012). Attitude of senior secondary students towards e-learning. Elixir Educational Technology, 51, 10886–10888.Google Scholar
- Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., & Caballé, S. (2013). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. In 2013 eighth international conference on P2P, parallel, grid, cloud and internet computing (3PGCIC) (pp. 208–213). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Drachsler, H., Hummel, H., van den Berg, B., Eshuis, J., Waterink, W., Nadolski, R., et al. (2009). Effects of the ISIS recommender system for navigation support in self-organised learning networks. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 115–126.Google Scholar
- Fasihuddin, H., Skinner, G., & Athauda, R. (2014). Towards an adaptive model to personalise open learning environments using learning styles. In International conference on information, communication technology and system (ICTS) (pp. 183–188). doi: 10.1109/ICTS.2014.7010580.
- Fischer, G. (2014). Supporting self-directed learning with cultures of participation in collaborative learning environments. In Problem-based learning for the 21st century-new practices and learning environments (pp. 15–50).Google Scholar
- Gal, E., & Nachmias, R. (2011). Implementing on-line learning and performance support using an EPSS. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(25), 213–224.Google Scholar
- Graf, S., Kinshuk, & Ives, C. (2010). A flexible mechanism for providing adaptivity based on learning styles in learning management systems. In Proceeding on 10th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 30–34). doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2010.16.
- Henning, P. A., Forstner, A., Heberle, F., Swertz, C., Schmölz, A., Barberi, A., et al. (2014a). Learning pathway recommendation based on a pedagogical ontology and its implementation in moodle. Lecture Notes in Informatics, 233, 39–50.Google Scholar
- Henning, P. A., Fuchs, K., Bock, J., Zander, S., Streicher, A., Zielinski, A., et al. (2014b). Personalized web learning by joining OER. Lecture Notes in Informatics, 233, 127–132.Google Scholar
- Henning, P., Heberle, F., Fuchs, K., Swertz, C., Schmölz, A., Forstner, A., et al. (2014c). INTUITEL—Intelligent tutorial interface for technology enhanced learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd conference on user modeling, adaptation, and personalization.Google Scholar
- Liyanage, M. P. P., Gunawardena, K. S. L., & Hirakawami, M. (2013). A framework for adaptive learning management systems using learning style. In Proceeding 2013 international conference on advances in ICT for emerging regions (pp. 261–265).Google Scholar
- Long, C. (2001). IP network design. New York City: Osborne/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Marengo, A., Pagano, A., & Barbone, A. (2012). Adaptive learning: A new approach in student modelling. In Proceeding ITI 2012 34th international conference on information technology interfaces (pp. 217–222).Google Scholar
- Mulwa, C., Lawless, S., Sharp, M., & Wade, V. (2011). A web-based framework for user-centred evaluation of end-user experience in adaptive and personalized e-learning systems. In Proceeding 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology (WI-IAT) (Vol. 3, pp. 351–356).Google Scholar
- Pascual-Nieto, I., Santos, O. C., Perez-Marin, D., & Boticario, J. G. (2011). Extending computer assisted assessment systems with natural language processing, user modeling, and recommendations based on human computer interaction and data mining. In Proceeding of the 22nd international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 2519–2524).Google Scholar
- Ryan, A., & Tilbury, D. (2013). Flexible pedagogies: New pedagogical ideas. UK: The Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/npi_report.pdf. Accessed September 3, 2015.
- Saneifar, H., Bringay, S., Laurent, A., & Teisseire, M. (2008). S 2 MP: Similarity measure for sequential patterns. In Proceeding of the 7th Australasian data mining conference (Vol. 87, pp. 95–104). Australian Computer Society, Inc.Google Scholar
- Schmoelz, A., Swertz, S., Forstner, A., & Barberi, A. (2014). Does artificial tutoring foster inquiry based learning? Science Education International, 25(1), 123–129.Google Scholar
- Sessink, O. D. T., Beeftink, H. H., Tramper, J., & Hartog, R. J. M. (2007). Proteus: A lecturer-friendly adaptive tutoring system. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 533–554.Google Scholar
- Sunar, A. S., Abdullah, N. A., White, S., & Davis, H. C. (2015). Personalisation of MOOCs: The state of the art. In Proceeding CSEDU 2015 conference (Vol. 1, pp. 88–97).Google Scholar
- Swertz, C., Schmölz, A., Forstner, A., Heberle, F., Henning, P., Streicher, A., et al. (2013). A pedagogical ontology as a playground in adaptive e-learning environments. Lecture Notes in Informatics, 220, 1955–1960.Google Scholar
- van Schaik, P., Barker, P., & Famakinwa, O. (2007). Making a case for using electronic performance support systems in academic libraries. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(3), 411–428.Google Scholar
- Verdú, E., de Castro, J. P., Verdú, M. J., Regueras, L., & Henning, P. A. (2013). Intelligent tutoring interface for technology enhanced learning with moodle. In Proceeding EDULEARN13 5th international conference on education and new learning technologies.Google Scholar
- Verdú, E., Regueras, L., Verdú, M. J., de Castro, J. P., Kohen-Vacs, D., Gal, E., et al. (2014). Intelligent tutoring interface for technology enhanced learning in a course of computer network design. In Proceeding 2014 IEEE frontiers in education conference (pp. 932–938).Google Scholar
- Verdú, E., Regueras, L. M., Verdú, M. J., de Castro, J. P., & Prez, M. A. (2008). An analysis of the research on adaptive learning: The next generation of e-Learning. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 5(6), 859–868.Google Scholar
- Weber, G., & Brusilovsky, P. (2001). ELM-ART: An adaptive versatile system for web-based instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 351–384.Google Scholar
- Yáñez, R., Cascado, D., & Sevillano, J. L. (2014). Heuristic evaluation on mobile interfaces: A new checklist. The Scientific World Journal. doi: 10.1155/2014/434326.