Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a multilevel path analysis model
- 2.8k Downloads
The purpose of this research was to design and test a model of classroom technology integration in the context of K-12 schools. The proposed multilevel path analysis model includes teacher, contextual, and school related variables on a teacher’s use of technology and confidence and comfort using technology as mediators of classroom technology integration. Data were collected from 1235 K-12 teachers, who were located in 336 schools in 41 districts across the state of Florida. The results suggest that a teacher’s experience with technology significantly influenced his or her classroom technology integration. Access to technology in classrooms and the availability of quality technology support were related to classroom technology integration. In addition, how frequently a teacher uses technology and his or her confidence and comfort using technology were mediators for classroom technology integration. These results provide preliminary evidence that the proposed model is both useful and relevant in explaining classroom technology integration in K-12 schools.
KeywordsTechnology integration K-12 schools Teachers Gender Confidence Comfort Access to technology
- Allsopp, M., Hohlfeld, T., & Kemker, K. (2007). The technology integration matrix: The development and field-test of an Internet based multi-media assessment tool for the implementation of instructional technology in the classroom. Paper presented at the Florida Educational Research Association, Tampa.Google Scholar
- Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136–155.Google Scholar
- Dawson, K., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2016). Differences in technology uses and perceptions among elementary, middle and high school teachers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009 (NCES 2010-040). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Harmes, C., Kemker, K., Kalaydjian, K., & Barron, A. E. (2000). Working toward national technology standards: Teacher use of computers in the classroom. Paper presented at the Florida Educational Research Association, Tallahassee, Florida.Google Scholar
- Hogarty, K., & Kromrey, J. (2000). The nature of technology use in classrooms: The development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ perceptions. Paper presented at the Florida Educational Research Association, Tallahassee, Florida.Google Scholar
- Lemke, C., Coughlin, E., & Reifsneider, D. (2009). Technology in schools: What the research says. Culver City, CA: Commissioned by Cisco. Retrieved April 20, 2014 from http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/education/tech_in_schools_what_research_says.pdf.
- Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233–263.Google Scholar
- Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59–68.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Muthén, B., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 267–316). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- O’Dwyer, L., Russell, M., & Bebel, D. (2004). Elementary teachers’ use of technology: Characteristics of teachers, schools, and districts associated with technology use. Boston, MA: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.Google Scholar
- Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. http://hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/01/15/SAMRABriefContextualizedIntroduction.pdf.
- Ringstaff, C., & Kelly, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology investment: A review of findings from research. San Francisco: WestEd RTEC.Google Scholar
- Schofield, J. W. (1999). Bringing the Internet to school: Lessons from an urban district. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar
- Schrum, L., Galizio, L. M., & Ledesma, P. (2011). Educational leadership and technology integration: An investigation into preparation, experiences, and roles. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 241–261.Google Scholar
- Tweed, S. R. (2013). Technology implementation: Teacher age, experience, self-efficacy, and professional development as related to classroom technology integration. Electronic theses and dissertations. Paper 1109. http://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1109.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2012). National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/.
- Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 120–173.Google Scholar