Inscribing ethics and values in designs for learning: a problematic
- 896 Downloads
The exponential growth in technological capability has resulted in increased interest on the short- and long-term effects of designed artifacts, leading to a focus in many design fields on the ethics and values that are inscribed in the designs we create. While ethical awareness is a key concern in many engineering, technology, and design disciplines—even an accreditation requirement in many fields—instructional design and technology (IDT) has not historically focused their view of practice on ethics, instead relying on a more scientistic view of practice which artificially limits the designer’s interaction with the surrounding society through the artifacts and experiences they design. In this paper, we argue for a heightened view of designer responsibility and design process in an ethical framing, drawing on methods and theoretical frameworks of ethical responsibility from the broader design community. We then demonstrate the frequency of ethical concerns that emerge in a content analysis of design cases that document authentic instructional design practice. We conclude with two paths forward to improve instructional design education and research regarding the nature of practice, advocating for increased documentation of design precedent to generatively complicate our notions of the design process, and for the creation and use of critical designs to foreground ethical and value-related concerns in IDT research and practice.
KeywordsEthics Values Guarantor of design Design precedent Critical design
This study was not funded.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
- Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2015). Criteria for accrediting applied science programs. http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/R001-16-17-ASAC-Criteria-10-19-15.pdf. Accessed 01 Dec 2015.
- Association for Educational Communications & Technology (AECT). (2007). Code of professional ethics. http://aect.site-ym.com/members/group_content_view.asp?group=91131&id=309963. Accessed 01 Nov 2015.
- Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2011). Towards a feminist HCI methodology: Social science, feminism, and HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 675–684). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2015). Humanistic HCI. San Rafael: Morgan Claypool Publishers.Google Scholar
- Becker, L. C., & Becker, C. B. (Eds.). (2001). Encyclopedia of ethics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Boling, E. (2010). The need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Boling, E., & Gray, C. M. (2015). Designerly tools, sketching, and instructional designers and the guarantors of design. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience: Creating the future of educational technology (pp. 109–126). Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2012). The changing nature of design. In R. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 358–366). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Borning, A., & Muller, M. (2012). Next steps for value sensitive design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1125–1134). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Cahn, S. M., & Markie, P. (1998). Ethics: History, theory and contemporary issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, R. C., Yasuhara, K., & Wilson, D. (2012). Care ethics in engineering education: Undergraduate student perceptions of responsibility. In Frontiers in education conference (FIE). Seattle, WA: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462370.
- Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cockton, G. (2005). A development framework for value-centred design. In CHI ‘05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1292–1295). New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/1056808.1056899.
- Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
- Cultural Research in Technology Group (CRIT). (n.d.). Pee Timer (Austin Toombs and Shad Gross, designers). http://crit.soic.indiana.edu/design. Accessed 01 Nov 2015.
- Damarin, S. K. (1994). Equity, caring, and beyond: Can feminist ethics inform educational technology? Educational Technology, 34(2), 34–39.Google Scholar
- Detweiler, C., Pommeranz, A., & Stark, L. (2012). Methods to account for values in human-centered computing. CHI’12 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2735–2738). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- DiSalvo, C. (2012). Adversarial design. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dunne, J. (1997). Back to the rough ground: Practical judgment and the lure of technique. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
- Dunne, A. (2005). Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Fallman, D. (2011). The new good: Exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1051–1060). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Ferri, G., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Louraine, S. (2014). Analyzing critical designs: Categories, distinctions, and canons of exemplars. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 355–364). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Flanagan, M., & Nissenbaum, H. F. (2014). Values at play in digital games. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (1970/2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Friedman, K. (2012). Models of design: Envisioning a future design education. Visible Language, 46(1/2), 132–153.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2003). Human values, ethics, and design. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1177–1201). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington Technical Report, 02–12. http://faculty.washington.edu/pkahn/articles/vsd-theory-methods-tr.pdf. Accessed 01 Nov 2015.
- Gaver, W. W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., et al. (2004). The drift table: Designing for ludic engagement. CHI’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 885–900). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Gibbons, A. S. (2013). An architectural approach to instructional design. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard Educational Press.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Alpine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Gray, C. M., Dagli, C., Demiral-Uzan, M., Ergulec, F., Tan, V., Altuwaijri, A. A., et al. (2015a). Judgment and instructional design: How ID practitioners work in practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(3), 25–49.Google Scholar
- Gray, C. M., & Howard, C. D. (2015). Normative concerns, avoided: Instructional barriers in designing for social change. In R. S. Adams, P. Buzzanell, & J. A. Siddiqui (Eds.), Analyzing design review conversations (pp. 241–260). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
- Gray, C. M., Yilmaz, S., Daly, S., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2015b). Idea generation through empathy: Reimagining the ‘cognitive walkthrough’. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference (pp. 26.871.1–26.871.29), Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- Hart Research Associates. (2015). Falling short? College learning and career success. Conducted on Behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2015employerstudentsurvey.pdf. Accessed 01 Nov 2015.
- Huber, A. M. (2015). Diminishing the dread: Exploring service learning and student motivation. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 6(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
- Ihde, D. (1993). Philosophy of technology: An introduction. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
- Inouye, D. K., Merrill, P. F., & Swan, R. H. (2005). Help: Toward a new ethics-centered paradigm for instructional design and technology. IDT Record. http://www.indiana.edu/~idt/articles/documents/ethics.htm. Accessed 01 Nov 2015.
- Koepfler, J. A., Stark, L., Dourish, P., Sengers, P., & Shilton, K. (2014). Values & design in HCI education. CHI’14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 127–130). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages (Essays on Moral Development, Volume 2). San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
- Le Dantec, C. A., Poole, E. S., & Wyche, S. P. (2009). Values as lived experience: Evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1141–1150). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Louw, M., Ansari, A., Bartley, C., & Sanford, C. (2013). Stories in the rock: A design case of an explorable image viewer in a natural history museum. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 4(2), 56–71.Google Scholar
- Marcuse, H. (1991). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Mulcahy, R. S. (2011). Bottom line: Defining success in the creation of a business simulation. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 2(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Nichols, R. G. (1994). Searching for moral guidance about educational technology. Educational Technology, 34(2), 40–48.Google Scholar
- Papanek, V. (1995). The green imperative: Ecology and ethics in design and architecture. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
- Papanek, V. (2005). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago Review Press.Google Scholar
- Papert, S. (1987). A critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. http://www.papert.org/articles/ACritiqueofTechnocentrism.html. Accessed 01 Nov 2015.
- Prestopnik, N., & Foley, A. R. (2012). Visualizing the past: The design of a temporally enabled map for presentation (TEMPO). International Journal of Designs for Learning, 3(1), 52–60.Google Scholar
- Racek, J., & Smith, K. M. (2013). A place to play: Teaching communities how to build playgrounds. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 4(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Shilton, K., Koepfler, J. A., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2014). How to see values in social computing: Methods for studying values dimensions. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14) (pp. 426–435). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2531602.2531625.
- Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, K. M. (2010). Producing the rigorous design case. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 10–20.Google Scholar
- Smith, K. M., & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology, 49(4), 3–17.Google Scholar
- Stolterman, E. (2016). Herbert Marcuse and the “One-dimensional man”. In J. Bardzell, S. Bardzell, & M. Blythe (Eds.), Critical Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sunderland, M. E., Ahn, J., Carson, C., & Kastenberg, W. (2013). Making ethics explicit: Relocating ethics to the core of engineering education. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference (pp. 23–26). Washington: ASEE.Google Scholar
- Toombs, A. L., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2015). The proper care and feeding of hackerspaces: Care ethics and cultures of making. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 629–638). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Tracey, M. W., & Unger, K. L. (2010). Cross cultural instruction: An instructional design case. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1).Google Scholar
- Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Warschauer, M., & Ames, M. (2010). Can one laptop per child save the world’s poor? Journal of International Affairs, 64(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
- Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.Google Scholar
- Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., & Luetkehans, L. M. (2014). Longitudinal design case of a university preservice technology integration curriculum shaped by its sociopolitical context. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 5(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
- Yeaman, A. R. J., Koetting, J. R., & Nichols, R. G. (1994). Critical theory, cultural analysis and the ethics of educational technology as social responsibility. Educational Technology, 34(2), 5–13.Google Scholar
- Young, P. A. (2008). Integrating culture in the design of ICTs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 6–17.Google Scholar
- Young, P. A. (2014). Disclosing the design of an african american educational technology: Bridge: A cross culture reading program. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 5(2), 34–55.Google Scholar
- Young, I. (2015). Practical empathy: For collaboration and creativity in your work. New York: Rosenfeld Media.Google Scholar