Instructional design, facilitation, and perceived learning outcomes: an exploratory case study of a human trafficking MOOC for attitudinal change
- 1.9k Downloads
This exploratory case study describes the design and facilitation of a massive open online course (MOOC) for attitudinal change regarding human trafficking. It examines the course from the learners’, instructor’s, and instructional designer’s perspectives. Two interviews with the instructor and instructional designer were conducted, and data from a sample of learners via an end-of-course survey (n = 54) and follow-up questionnaire (n = 319) were gathered. Learners’ discussion posts and sample assignments were also reviewed. Findings show that the instructor and instructional designer perceived the design and facilitation of the MOOC as highly complex and challenging. Learner feedback was contradictory, possibly due to different expectations and needs within the MOOC. Six instructional design considerations for MOOCs in general and for attitudinal change are discussed, including: (a) MOOCs as a unique platform for attitudinal change, (b) the support needed from platform providers and universities, (c) personal and flexible learning paths, (d) instructional activities for attitudinal dissonance, (e) creating a collaborative community, and (f) MOOC instructor preparation.
KeywordsInstructional design Attitudinal change MOOC Facilitation
We would like to thank the Human Trafficking MOOC instructor and instructional designer for their help in providing access to the course and their participation in the study, as well as the students for their participation.
- Adair, D., Alman, S. W., Budzick, D., Grisham, L. M., Mancini, M. E., & Thackaberry, A. S. (2014). Many shades of MOOCs. Internet Learning Journal, 3(1), 7.Google Scholar
- Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Buehl, M. M., & Sperl, C. T. (1998). The influence of prior knowledge, beliefs, and interest in learning from persuasive text. In T. Shanahan & F. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 167–181). National Reading Conference, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Bali, M. (2014). MOOC pedagogy: Gleaning good practice from existing MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 44–56.Google Scholar
- Beaven, T., Hauck, M., Comas-Quinn, A., Lewis, T., & de los Arcos, B. (2014). MOOCs: Striking the right balance between facilitation and self-determination. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
- Bednar, A., & Levie, W. H. (1993). Attitude-change principles. In M. Fleming & W. H. Levie (Eds.), Instructional message design (pp. 283–302). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Bodenhausen, G. V., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Attitude change. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 957–969). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25.Google Scholar
- Brouns, F., Mota, J., Morgado, L., Jansen, D., Fano, S., Silva, A., & Teixeira, A. (2014). A networked learning framework for effective MOOC design: The ECO project approach. In A. M. Teixeira & A. Szücs (Eds.), 8th EDEN Research Workshop. Challenges for research into open & distance learning: doing things better: Doing better things (pp. 161-171). Budapest, EDEN, Oxford. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1820/5569.
- Carver, L., & Harrison, L. M. (2013). MOOCs and democratic education. Liberal Education, 99(4), 20. Retrieved from https://aacu.org/liberaleducation/2013/fall/carver-harrison.
- Coursera. (2015). Human trafficking. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/course/humantrafficking.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Flynn, J. (2013). MOOCS: Disruptive innovation and the future of higher education. Christian Education Journal, 10(1), 149–162.Google Scholar
- Gagne, R., Briggs, L., & Wagner, W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
- Head, K. (2013). Massive open online adventure. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Massive-Open-Online-Adventure/138803/.
- Hynd, C. (2003). Conceptual change in response to persuasive messages. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 291–315). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Kamradt, T. F., & Kamradt, E. J. (1999). Structured design for attitudinal instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 563–590). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Kirschner, A. (2012). A Pioneer in online education tries a MOOC. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(6), B21–B22.Google Scholar
- Koller, D., Ng, A., Chuong, D., & Zhenghao, C. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In depth. EDUCAUSE Review Online, 48(3), 62–63. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/retention-and-intention-massive-open-online-courses-depth-0.
- Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(7), 74–93.Google Scholar
- Koutropoulos, A., Gallagher, M. S., Abajian, S. C., de Waard, I., Hogue, R. J., Keskin, N. Ö., & Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). Emotive vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & participant retention. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15(1), 2012.Google Scholar
- Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227.Google Scholar
- McGill, I., & Beaty, L. (2001). Action learning: A guide for professional, management & educational development. Palo Alto: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Merrill, M. D. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, efficient and engaging instruction. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ota, M. (2013). MOOCs: Falling short of what online learning could be. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Learner experiences with MOOCs and open online learning (pp. 10–13). Hybrid Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://hybrid-pedagogy.github.io/LearnerExperiencesInMOOCs/.
- Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2010). Attitude change (pp. 217–259). Advanced social psychology: The state of the science.Google Scholar
- Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2011). The elaboration likelihood model. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 1, 224–245.Google Scholar
- Rice, J. (2013). What I learned in MOOC. College Composition and Communication, 64(4), 695–703.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2012&halfyear=2&article=516.
- Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 56–68.Google Scholar
- Simonson, M. R., & Maushak, N. (1996). Situated learning, instructional technology, and attitude change. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated Learning Perspectives (pp. 225–242). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (p. 3). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Smith-D’Arezzo, W. M., & Moore-Thomas, C. (2010). Children’s perceptions of peers with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 6(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
- Turner, D. A. (1992). Roleplays: A Sourcebook of Activities for Trainers. London: Kogan Page Limited.Google Scholar
- UN General Assembly (2000). Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, Supplementing the United Nations convention against transnational organized crime. Accessed Aug 4, 2015, from https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/a_res_55/res5525e.pdf.
- Veletsianos, G. (2013). Learner Experiences with MOOCs and Open Online Learning. Hybrid Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://learnerexperiences.hybridpedagogy.com.
- Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2).Google Scholar
- Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J., & Loizzo, J. (2016a). Instructor’s use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance: A case study of an attitudinal change MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379.
- Watson, W. R., Kim, W., & Watson, S. L. (2016b). Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an Animal Behavior and Welfare MOOC. Computers & Education, 96, 83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.013.
- Wexler, E. (2015). MOOCs are still rising, at least in numbers. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/moocs-are-still-rising-at-least-in-numbers/57527.
- Zahn, C., Schaeffeler, N., Giel, K. E., Wessel, D., Thiel, A., Zipfel, S., & Hesse, F. W. (2014). Video clips for YouTube: Collaborative video creation as an educational concept for knowledge acquisition and attitude change related to obesity stigmatization. Education and Information Technologies, 19(3), 603–621. doi: 10.1007/s10639-013-9277-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1882–1895). ACM.Google Scholar
- Zimbardo, P. G., & Leippe, M. R. (1991). The psychology of attitude change and social influence. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar