Science Spots AR: a platform for science learning games with augmented reality
- 1.7k Downloads
Lack of motivation and of real-world relevance have been identified as reasons for low interest in science among children. Game-based learning and storytelling are prominent methods for generating intrinsic motivation in learning. Real-world relevance requires connecting abstract scientific concepts with the real world. This can be done by situating learning processes in real-world contexts, and by bridging the virtual content and the real world with augmented reality (AR). We combined these ideas into a Science Spots AR platform on which context-aware storytelling science learning games can be created. As proof-of-concept we developed and evaluated Leometry game, which contains geometry problems based on the Van Hiele model. This paper’s contributions are as follows: (1) concept and architecture of Science Spots AR, (2) design and implementation of the Leometry game prototype, and (3) mixed-method formative evaluation of Leometry with 61 Korean 5th grade elementary school children. Data retrieved by questionnaires and interviews revealed that the students appreciated Leometry despite its minor shortcomings, that the platform’s concept is feasible, and that there is potential for building science learning games. These results are useful to educators, computer scientists, and game designers who are interested in combining context-aware learning, AR, and games.
KeywordsContext-aware Augmented reality Games Science learning Storytelling
We are thankful to Renny Lindberg, Daehwan Kim, Nina Hytönen and Jaemu Lee for their contributions to Leometry. Yuna Oh and the children participating in the Leometry evaluation also deserve our gratitude. This work was supported by the Korean National Research Foundation project NRF-2015R1C1A1A02036469.
Compliance with ethical standards
Research involves children as participants. Before running the experiment with the children, we acquired data collection and media usage permissions from their guardians. Furthermore, children’s personal data such as names were not collected.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Balog, A., & Pribeanu, C. (2010). The role of perceived Enjoyment in the students acceptance of an augmented reality teaching platform: A structural equation modeling approach. Studies in Informatics and Control, 19(3), 319–330.Google Scholar
- Dionisio Correa, A. G., Tahira, A., Ribeir, J. B., Kitamura, R. K., Inoue, T. Y., & Karaguilla Ficheman, I. (2013). Development of an interactive book with Augmented Reality for mobile learning. In Proceedings of the Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (pp. 1–7). Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
- Dirin, A., & Nieminen, M. (2013). State-of-the-art m-learning usability and user experience. In The fourth international conference on e-learning (pp. 130–139). Czech Republic.Google Scholar
- Duveskog, M. (2015). Digital storytelling for HIV and AIDS education in Africa. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.Google Scholar
- Epstein, M., Lazarus, A., Calvano, T., Matthews, K., Hendel, R., Epstein, B., & Brosvic, G. (2002). Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52(2), 187–201.Google Scholar
- Fensham, P. J. (2008). Science education policy-making: Eleven emerging issues (UNESCO). Retrieved from http://goo.gl/0erjiV.
- Flagg, B. N. (1990). Formative evaluation for educational technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gottschall, J. (2012). The storytelling animal: how stories make us human. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Heumer, G., Gommlich, F., Jung, B., & Mueller, A. (2007). Via Mineralia—A pervasive museum exploration game. In Proceedings of PerGames 2007 (pp. 159–160). Salzburg, Austria.Google Scholar
- Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, D.C: The National Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hung, C. M., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, I. (2012). a project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students’ learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 368–379.Google Scholar
- Jeng, Y. L., Wu, T. T., Huang, Y. M., Tan, Q., & Yang, S. J. H. (2010). The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: A review study. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 3–11.Google Scholar
- Laine, T. H. (2012). Technology integration in context-aware learning spaces. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.Google Scholar
- Laine, T. H., Islas Sedano, C., Sutinen, E., & Joy, M. (2010). Viable and portable architecture for pervasive learning spaces. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia. Limassol, Cyprus.Google Scholar
- Lehmann, S. E. (2013). TaleBlazer: Implementing a multiplayer server for location-based augmented reality games. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
- Liu, T.-Y., Tan, T.-H., & Chu, Y.-L. (2009). Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 161–175.Google Scholar
- Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, 3, 223–253.Google Scholar
- Murray, J., Goldenberg, S., Agarwal, K., Chakravorty, T., Cutrell, J., Doris-Down, A., et al. (2012). Story-map: iPad companion for long form TV narratives. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on interactive TV and video (pp. 223–226).Google Scholar
- Porter, C., & Parvin, J. (2008). Learning to Love Science: Harnessing children’s scientific imagination. York: The Chemical Industry Education Centre, University of York.Google Scholar
- Reilly, M. (1974). Play as exploratory learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Rogers, Y., Price, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Fleck, R., Harris, E., Smith, H., et al. (2004). Ambient wood: Designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. In Proceedings of the third international conference for interaction design and children (pp. 3–10). College Park, MD, USA.Google Scholar
- Rossiter, M. (2002). Narrative and stories in adult teaching and learning. ERIC Digest, 2002(241), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Van Hiele, P. (1984). In D. J. Fuys, D. Geddes, & R. Tischler (Eds.), English translation of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M van Hiele. Brooklyn, NY: Brooklyn College.Google Scholar
- Westlin, J., & Laine, T. H. (2014a). Calory battle AR: An extensible mobile augmented reality platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (pp. 171–172). Seoul: IEEE.Google Scholar
- Wu, D. B., & Ma, H. (2006). The distributions of van hiele levels of geometric thinking among 1st through 6th graders. In Proceedings of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 409–416). Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
- Yusoff, R. C. M., Zaman, H. B., & Ahmad, A. (2011). Evaluation of user acceptance of mixed reality technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1369–1387.Google Scholar