How teachers learn: the roles of formal, informal, and independent learning
- 2k Downloads
A qualitative study of math and science teachers at two middle schools identifies how their system for learning to integrate technology into their teaching goes beyond what school leaders typically consider when planning for teachers’ learning. In addition to (a) the district-initiated, or formal, system of professional development (PD) and professional learning communities (PLCs), it includes (b) teacher-initiated, or informal, learning with colleagues as well as (c) teachers’ independent learning activities. Analysis of why and how they form their system highlights how by only supporting the formal PD activities and PLCs, the district not only loses the valuable collective knowledge of the districts’ teachers derived from their informal and independent learning activities, but also diminishes the learning teachers derive from the formal PD activities since informal collaborations and independent work after formal PD activities often helps to bring the learning from the training room to the classroom. We present teachers’ insights and then discuss implications for the design of a holistic approach to facilitate teachers’ formal, informal, and independent learning that is tied together and supported by technology. While research on formal, informal and independent teacher learning exists, with technology frequently mentioned as a potential support for each of these three modes, these approaches have not been considered together as interdependent parts of the same holistic system for teacher learning nor has the way technology might knit these modes of teacher learning together been imagined as a part of that system.
KeywordsTechnology related teacher professional development Formal and informal teacher learning Technology integration
- Alderton, E., Brunsell, E., & Bariexca, D. (2011). The end of isolation. The Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
- Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28–33.Google Scholar
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, and experience & school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- DuFour, R. (2004). Schools as learning communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11. Retrieved from http://www.plainfieldnjk12.org/pps_staff/docs/dufour_PLCs.pdf.
- Duran, M., Brunvard, S., & Fossum, P. R. (2009). Preparing science teachers to teach with technology: Exploring a K-16 networked learning community approach. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), 21–43.Google Scholar
- Flanigan, R. L. (2011). Professional learning networks taking off. Education Week, 31(9), 10–12. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/10/26/09edtech-network.h31.html?tkn=NXCFrTi53Q/ RNUP7oI3Dyieu/9gskTJyoOc/.
- Gerard, Libby F., Bowyer, J. B., & Linn, M. C. (2010). How does a community of principals develop leadership for technology-enhanced science? Journal of School Leadership, 20(2), 145–183.Google Scholar
- Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Educational technology in US public schools: Fall 2008 (NCES 2010-034). US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010034.pdf.
- Hamos, J. E., Bergin, K. B., Maki, D. P., Perez, L. C., Prival, J. T., Rainey, D. Y., et al. (2009). Opening the classroom door: Professional learning communities in the math and science partnership program. Science Educator, 18(2), 14–24.Google Scholar
- Lai, K. W., Pratt, K., Anderson, M., & Stigter, J. (2006). Literature Review and Synthesis: Online Communities of Practice. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/7480/lrs-online-com.pdf.
- Loving, C. C., Schroeder, C., Kang, R., Shimek, C., & Herbert, B. (2007). Blogs: Enhancing links in a professional learning community of science and mathematics teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 178–198.Google Scholar
- Mackey, J., & Evans, T. (2011). Interconnecting networks of practice for professional learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
- Ming, T. S., Wah, L. K., Azman, H., Yean, T. L., & Sim, L. Y. (2010). Grappling with technology: A case of supporting Malaysian Smart School teachers’ professional development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 400–416.Google Scholar
- Richardson, W., & Mancabelli, R. (2011). Personal learning networks. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar
- Riverin, S., & Stacey, E. (2008). Sustaining an online community of practice: A case study. Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 43–58.Google Scholar
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm.
- Tytler, R., Symington, D., Malcolm, C., & Kirkwood, V. (2009). Assuming responsibility: Teachers taking charge of their professional development. Teaching Science—The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 55(2), 9–15.Google Scholar
- Vavasseur, C. B., & Macgregor, S. K. (2008). Extending content-focused professional development through online communities of practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 517–536. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ826089.pdf.