Advertisement

How teachers learn: the roles of formal, informal, and independent learning

  • W. Monty JonesEmail author
  • Sara Dexter
Development Article

Abstract

A qualitative study of math and science teachers at two middle schools identifies how their system for learning to integrate technology into their teaching goes beyond what school leaders typically consider when planning for teachers’ learning. In addition to (a) the district-initiated, or formal, system of professional development (PD) and professional learning communities (PLCs), it includes (b) teacher-initiated, or informal, learning with colleagues as well as (c) teachers’ independent learning activities. Analysis of why and how they form their system highlights how by only supporting the formal PD activities and PLCs, the district not only loses the valuable collective knowledge of the districts’ teachers derived from their informal and independent learning activities, but also diminishes the learning teachers derive from the formal PD activities since informal collaborations and independent work after formal PD activities often helps to bring the learning from the training room to the classroom. We present teachers’ insights and then discuss implications for the design of a holistic approach to facilitate teachers’ formal, informal, and independent learning that is tied together and supported by technology. While research on formal, informal and independent teacher learning exists, with technology frequently mentioned as a potential support for each of these three modes, these approaches have not been considered together as interdependent parts of the same holistic system for teacher learning nor has the way technology might knit these modes of teacher learning together been imagined as a part of that system.

Keywords

Technology related teacher professional development Formal and informal teacher learning Technology integration 

References

  1. Alderton, E., Brunsell, E., & Bariexca, D. (2011). The end of isolation. The Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. Barab, S. A., Makinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2003). Designing system dualities: Characterizing a web-supported professional development community. Information Society, 19(3), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28–33.Google Scholar
  4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, and experience & school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  5. DuFour, R. (2004). Schools as learning communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11. Retrieved from http://www.plainfieldnjk12.org/pps_staff/docs/dufour_PLCs.pdf.
  6. Duran, M., Brunvard, S., & Fossum, P. R. (2009). Preparing science teachers to teach with technology: Exploring a K-16 networked learning community approach. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), 21–43.Google Scholar
  7. Easton, L. B. (2008). From professional development to professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(10), 755–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flanigan, R. L. (2011). Professional learning networks taking off. Education Week, 31(9), 10–12. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/10/26/09edtech-network.h31.html?tkn=NXCFrTi53Q/ RNUP7oI3Dyieu/9gskTJyoOc/.
  9. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, S. Y. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerard, Libby F., Bowyer, J. B., & Linn, M. C. (2010). How does a community of principals develop leadership for technology-enhanced science? Journal of School Leadership, 20(2), 145–183.Google Scholar
  11. Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Educational technology in US public schools: Fall 2008 (NCES 2010-034). US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010034.pdf.
  12. Hamos, J. E., Bergin, K. B., Maki, D. P., Perez, L. C., Prival, J. T., Rainey, D. Y., et al. (2009). Opening the classroom door: Professional learning communities in the math and science partnership program. Science Educator, 18(2), 14–24.Google Scholar
  13. Higgins, T. E., & Spitulnik, M. W. (2008). Supporting teachers’ use of technology in science instruction through professional development: A literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 511–521. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9118-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, H. C. (2009). Fixing teacher professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hur, J. W., & Brush, T. A. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lai, K. W., Pratt, K., Anderson, M., & Stigter, J. (2006). Literature Review and Synthesis: Online Communities of Practice. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/7480/lrs-online-com.pdf.
  17. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loving, C. C., Schroeder, C., Kang, R., Shimek, C., & Herbert, B. (2007). Blogs: Enhancing links in a professional learning community of science and mathematics teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 178–198.Google Scholar
  19. Mackey, J., & Evans, T. (2011). Interconnecting networks of practice for professional learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
  20. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  21. Martin, W., Strother, S., Beglau, M., Bates, L., Reitzes, T., & Culp, K. M. (2010). Connecting instructional technology professional development to teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ming, T. S., Wah, L. K., Azman, H., Yean, T. L., & Sim, L. Y. (2010). Grappling with technology: A case of supporting Malaysian Smart School teachers’ professional development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 400–416.Google Scholar
  23. Plair, S. (2008). Revamping professional development for technology integration and fluency. The Clearing House, 82(2), 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richardson, W., & Mancabelli, R. (2011). Personal learning networks. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar
  25. Riverin, S., & Stacey, E. (2008). Sustaining an online community of practice: A case study. Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 43–58.Google Scholar
  26. Rodrigues, S., Marks, A., & Steel, P. (2003). Developing science and ICT pedagogical content knowledge: A model of continuing professional development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(4), 386–394. doi: 10.1080/1470329032000128413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm.
  28. Stevenson, H. J. (2004). Teachers’ informal collaboration regarding technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tytler, R., Symington, D., Malcolm, C., & Kirkwood, V. (2009). Assuming responsibility: Teachers taking charge of their professional development. Teaching Science—The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 55(2), 9–15.Google Scholar
  30. Vavasseur, C. B., & Macgregor, S. K. (2008). Extending content-focused professional development through online communities of practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 517–536. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ826089.pdf.
  31. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (18th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Curry School of EducationUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations