Trends of educational technology research: more than a decade of international research in six SSCI-indexed refereed journals

International Review

Abstract

This study applied text mining methods to examine the abstracts of 2,997 international research articles published between 2000 and 2010 by six journals included in the Social Science Citation Index in the field of Educational Technology (EDTECH). A total of 19 clusters of research areas were identified, and these clusters were further analyzed in terms of productivity by country and by journal. The analysis revealed research areas with rising trends, stable status, and low attention. This study also identified areas of research emphasis by journal and research strength by country. A discussion of results through the lens of Critical Theory of Technology is also included. The authors hope to inform the EDTECH community about the trends of EDTECH research on topics and regions of research contributions. The authors also believe that such examination of trends can help facilitate fruitful discussions of directions for future research, and possible international collaboration across various geographical regions.

Keywords

Educational technology International research trends Text mining SSCI 

References

  1. Brown, L. D., & Gardner, J. C. (1985). Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (CAR). Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 84–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cameron, T., & Bennett, S. (2010). Learning objects in practice: The integration of reusable learning objects in primary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 897–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, C. K., Chen, G. D., & Li, L. Y. (2008). Constructing a community of practice to improve coursework activity. Computers & Education, 50(1), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, M., Wang, C.-Y., & Chen, G. D. (2009). National program for e-learning in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, L.-H. (2010). Web-based learning programs: Use by learners with various cognitive styles. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1028–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies, I., & Schwen, T. (1971). Toward a definition of instructional development. Washington: AECT.Google Scholar
  7. Delwiche, A. (2006). Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 160–172.Google Scholar
  8. Ely, D. P. (1963). The changing role of the audiovisual process: A definition and glossary of related terms. Audiovisual Communication Review, 11((1), Supplement 6), 1–6.Google Scholar
  9. Fayyad, U. M., Pitatesky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurasamy, R. (1996). Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Anaheim, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Feenberg, A. (2005). The critical theory of technology: An overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies, 1(1), 47–64.Google Scholar
  11. Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Flem, J. A., McCracken, J., & Carran, D. (2004). A comparison of two methods of determining interrater reliability. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(2), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gall, J. E., Ku, H.-Y., Gurney, K., Tseng, H.-W., Yeh, H.-T., & Chen, Q. (2010). Citations of ETR&D and related journals, 1990–2004. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2010). Development of a reading material recommendation system based on a knowledge engineering approach. Computers & Education, 55(1), 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsu, Y.-C., Ching, Y.-H., & Grabowski, B. (2009). Web 2.0 technologies as cognitive tools of the new media age. In L. W. H. Tan & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and challenges (pp. 353–371). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hung, J. L. (2012). Trends of e-learning research from 2000–2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hung, J. L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jain, A. K., Murthy, M. N., & Flynn, P. J. (1999). Data clustering: A review. ACM Computing Reviews, 31(3), 264–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2007). Definition. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, E. P., Perry, J., & Shamir, H. (2010). Variability in reading ability gains as a function of computer-assisted instruction method of presentation. Computers & Education, 55(1), 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kostoff, R. N., Del Río, J. A., Cortés, H. D., Smith, C., Smith, A., Wagner, C., et al. (2007a). Clustering methodologies for identifying country core competencies. Journal of Information Science, 33(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2007b). Technical structure of the global nanoscience and nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9, 701–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, C. B. (2010). The interactions between problem solving and conceptual change: System dynamic modeling as a platform for learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1145–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, M.-H., Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C–. C. (2009). Research trends in Science Education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999–2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu, H. M., Wu, C. Y., & Chiu, C. H. (2009). Research trends in E-learning from 2005 to 2007: A content analysis of the articles published in selected journals. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 2619–2628). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  26. Luppicini, R. (2008). Educational technology at a crossroads: Examining the development of the academic field in Canada. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 281–296.Google Scholar
  27. Maurer, H., & Khan, M. S. (2010). Research trends in the field of e-learning from 2003 to 2008: A scientometric and content analysis for selected journals and conferences using visualization. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 7(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKinney, D., Dyck, J. L., & Luber, E. S. (2009). iTunes university and the classroom: Can podcasts replace professors? Computers & Education, 52(3), 617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mihalca, L., & Miclea, M. (2007). Current trends in educational technology research. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 11(1), 115–129.Google Scholar
  30. Oral, B. (2008). The evaluation of the student teachers’ attitudes toward internet and democracy. Computers & Education, 50(1), 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ozcinar, Z. (2009). The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980–2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 559–580.Google Scholar
  32. Park, J. (2010). Constructive multiple-choice testing system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 1054–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pozzi, F. (2010). Using Jigsaw and Case Study for supporting online collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Educational technology research past and present: Balancing rigor and relevance to impact school learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 17–35.Google Scholar
  35. Roytek, M. A. (2010). Enhancing instructional design efficiency: Methodologies employed by instructional designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seels, B., & Richey, R. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Google Scholar
  37. Shih, M., Feng, J., & Tsai, C-. C. (2008). Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals. Computers & Education, 51, 955–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 23(2–3), 124–142. Retrieved from https://springerlink3.metapress.com/content/k7w20300243822u5/resource-secured/?target=fulltext.pdf&sid=xo5ugt455ilzpwvm02buinzl&sh=www.springerlink.com. Accessed 26 Sept 2011.Google Scholar
  39. Teo, T. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomson Reuters (2009). 2009 Journal Citation Reports® Social Sciences Edition. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/journal_citation_reports/. Accessed 10 Nov 2010.
  42. Tiernan, P. (2010). Enhancing the learning experience of undergraduate technology students with LabVIEW™ software. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1579–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uzunboylu, H., Eriş, H., & Ozcinar, Z. (2011). Results of a citation analysis of knowledge management in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 527–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01018.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders’ analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 26–36.Google Scholar
  45. Wang, Q. (2008). Student-facilitators’ roles in moderating online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 859–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, S., & Heffernan, N. (2010). Ethical issues in computer-assisted language learning: Perceptions of teachers and learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 796–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Winn, W. D. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wisdom, J. P., White, N., Goldsmith, K., Bielavitz, S., Rees, A., & Davis, C. (2007). Systems limitations hamper integration of accessible information technology in northwest U.S. K-12 schools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 222–232.Google Scholar
  49. Zhang, K., & Hung, J. L. (2006). E-learning in Taiwan: Policies, practices, and problems. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 2(1), I37–I52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational TechnologyBoise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations