Does recreational computer use affect high school achievement?

  • Alex J. BowersEmail author
  • Matthew Berland
Research Article


Historically, the relationship between student academic achievement and use of computers for fun and video gaming has been described from a multitude of perspectives, from positive, to negative, to neutral. However, recent research has indicated that computer use and video gaming may be positively associated with achievement, yet these studies have focused on small intact and qualitative samples. The purpose of the present study is to examine the association between academic achievement in high school and student use of computers for fun and video gaming using the large nationally representative ELS:2002 sample of students in grade 10 in 2002 and an independent effects two-level hierarchical linear model. Our results indicate that both student use of computers for fun and moderate levels of video gaming were positive and significant on cross-sectional reading and mathematics achievement assessments in high school, controlling for multiple covariates of achievement, but were not related to growth in mathematics from grade 10 to grade 12.


Secondary education High school Computer attitudes Video games Computer based communication Computer access Achievement Reading Mathematics Television Internet Extracurricular activities Homework 


  1. Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., et al. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151–173. doi: 10.1037/a0018251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APA. (2005). Resolution on violence in video games and interactive media: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  3. Archibald, S. (2006). Narrowing in on educational resources that do affect student achievement. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(4), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Attewell, P., & Battle, J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  5. Berland, M., & Lee, V. (2011). Collaborative strategic board games as a site for distributed computational thinking. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borzekowski, D. L. G., & Robinson, T. N. (2005). The remote, the mouse and the no. 2 pencil: The household media environment and academic achievement among third grade students. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(7), 607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowers, A. J. (2009). Reconsidering grades as data for decision making: More than just academic knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(5), 609–629. doi: 10.1108/09578230910981080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowers, A. J. (2011). What’s in a grade? the multidimensional nature of what teacher assigned grades assess in high school. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(3), 141–159. doi: 10(1080/13803611).2011.597112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers and Human Behavior, 21(3), 487–508. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  12. Ferguson, C. J., & Kilburn, J. (2010). Much ado about nothing: The misestimation and overinterpretation of violent video game effects in Eastern and Western nations: Comment on Anderson et al. (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 174–178. doi: 10.1037/a0018566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From Wikipedia to the classroom: Exploring online publication and learning. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences (pp. 182–188). International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  14. Fuchs, T., & Woessmann, L. (2004). Computers and student learning: Bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school. CESifo Working Paper 1321. Munich: CESifo.Google Scholar
  15. Fuchs, T., & Woessmann, L. (2007). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Empirical Economics, 32(2), 433–464.Google Scholar
  16. Gee, J. P. (2004). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  17. Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2010). Women and gaming: The Sims and 21st century learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gentile, D. A., Lynch, P. J., Ruh Linder, J., & Walsh, D. A. (2004). The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 5–22. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elvira, E.-F. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In I. B. Weiner, J. A. Schinka, & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Volume 2 Research methods in psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534–537.Google Scholar
  21. Hancox, R. J., Milne, B. J., & Poulton, R. (2005). Association of television viewing during childhood with poor educational achievement. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(7), 614–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Huesmann, L. R. (2010). Nailing the coffin shut on doubts that violent video games stimulate aggression: Comment on Anderson et al. (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 179–181. doi: 10.1037/a0018567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingles, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Rogers, J. E., Siegel, P. H., Stutts, E. S., & Owings, J. A. (2004). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base year data file user’s manual. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  25. Ingles, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Wilson, D., Burns, L. J., Currivan, D., Rogers, J. E., et al. (2007). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base-year to second follow-up data file documentation. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  26. Jackson, L. A. (2008). Adolescents and the internet. In D. Romer & P. Jamieson (Eds.), The changing portrayal of American youth in popular media, Annenberg public policy center at the University of Pennsylvania (pp. 377–410). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jackson, L. A., von Eye, A., Biocca, F. A., Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2006). Does home internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children? Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 429–435. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson, L. A., von Eye, A., Witt, E. A., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2011). A longitudinal study of the effects of Internet use and videogame playing on academic performance and the roles of gender, race and income in these relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 228–239. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35–51. doi: 10.1007/BF02504505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keith, T. Z., Reimers, T. M., Fehrmann, P. G., Pottebaum, S. M., & Aubey, L. W. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(5), 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klein, S. (2010). Study: Too many video games may sap attention span—Health News— Retrieved from
  33. Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 470–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malamud, O., & Pop-Eleches, C. (2008). The effect of computer use on child outcomes. Unpublished Working Paper, The Harris School, The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  36. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nævdal, F. (2007). Home-PC usage and achievement in English. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1112–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. NCES. (n.d.). Education longitudinal study of 2002 (ELS:2002), from
  39. OECD. (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Papanastasiou, E. C., Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science achievement? The USA results from PISA. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 325–332. doi: 10.1023/A:1025093225753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Pew. (2000). Tracking online life: How women use the internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Retrieved from Accessed Dec 2011.
  43. Pew. (2005). Digital divisions. Retrieved from
  44. Pew. (2006). Internet evolution, internet penetration and impact. Retrieved from
  45. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & duToit, M. (2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W. H., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Estimating casual effects: Using experimental and observational designs (report from the Governing Board of the American Educational Research Association Grants Program). Washington, D C: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  49. Southwell, B. G., & Doyle, K. O. (2004). The Good, the Bad, or the Ugly? American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 391–401. doi: 10.1177/0002764204270277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. SPSS. (2010). SPSS Inc. (Version 19.0): IBM SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  51. Steinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S. (2008). Scientific habits of mind in virtual worlds. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 530–543. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9120-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strayhorn, T. L. (2009). Accessing and analyzing national databases. In T. J. Kowalski & T. J. Lasley (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making in education (pp. 105–122). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E. (2001). The impact of computer use on children’s and adolescents’ development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sutherland, R., Facer, K., Furlong, R., & Furlong, J. (2000). A new environment for education? The computer in the home. Computers and Education, 34(3–4), 195–212. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00045-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tabatabai, D., & Shore, B. M. (2005). How experts and novices search the web. Library and Information Science Research, 27(2), 222–248. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2005.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  57. Van den Bulck, J. (2004). Television viewing, computer game playing, and Internet use and self-reported time to bed and time out of bed in secondary-school children. Sleep, 27(1), 101–104.Google Scholar
  58. Wilensky, U. (1993). Connected mathematics: Building concrete relationships with mathematical knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  59. Willoughby, T. (2008). A short-term longitudinal study of Internet and computer game use by adolescent boys and girls: Prevalence, frequency of use, and psychosocial predictors. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 195–204. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.Google Scholar
  61. Wittwer, J., & Senkbeil, M. (2008). Is students’ computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school? Computers and Education, 50(4), 1558–1571. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teachers College, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.The University of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations