Educational Technology Research and Development

, Volume 60, Issue 6, pp 1051–1069 | Cite as

Online student orientation in higher education: a developmental study

  • Moon-Heum ChoEmail author
Development Article


Although orientation for online students is important to their success, little information about how to develop an online student orientation (OSO) has appeared in the literature; therefore, the purpose of this article was to describe the entire process of developing an OSO. This article describes the analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases of the OSO in higher education. The orientation consists of four modules titled as follows: (a) What is the nature of online learning? (b) How to learn in Blackboard (c) What are the technical requirements to take an online course? and (d) What learning skills and motivations are necessary for online learning? Formative evaluation was conducted to improve the initially developed OSO program. Summative evaluation showed the OSO program can be useful for future online students. Discussion and future direction of OSO program are provided.


Online student orientation Online learning Distance education 


  1. Ali, R., & Leeds, E. (2009). The impact of classroom orientation in online student retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(4). Retrieved from
  2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2009). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and the Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from
  3. Anderton, B. (2006). Using the online course to promote self-regulated learning strategies in pre-service teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(2), 156–177.Google Scholar
  4. Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atack, L. (2003). Becoming a web-based learner: Registered nurses’ experiences. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Bozarth, J., Chapman, D. D., & LaMonica, L. (2004). Preparing for distance learning: Designing an online student orientation. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1), 87–106.Google Scholar
  9. Cho, M.-H. (2008). The development of online self-regulated learning model and initial validation of human interaction component of online self-regulated learning. Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
  10. Cho, M.-H., & Jonassen, D. (2009). Development of the human interaction dimension of the self-regulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments. Educational Psychology, 29, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho, M.-H., Shen, D., & Laffey, J. (2010). Relationships between self-regulation and social experiences in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21, 297–316.Google Scholar
  12. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  13. Hatcher, L. (1994). Step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Hirumi, A., Savenye, W., & Allen, B. (1994). Designing interactive videodisc-based museum exhibits: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holcomb, L. B., King, F. B., & Brown, S. W. (2004). Student traits and attributes contributing to success in online courses: Evaluation of university online courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3). Retrieved from
  16. Huang, H.-M. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2004). Teaching online: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73–81.Google Scholar
  20. McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2002). Computer support for curriculum developers: CASCADE. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McVay, M. (2000). Developing a web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online bachelor’s degree completion program. Unpublished practicum report, Nova Southestern University, Florida.Google Scholar
  22. Nash, R. D. (2005). Course completion rates among distance learners: Identifying possible methods to improve retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4). Retrieved from
  23. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roper, A. R. (2007). How students develop online learning skills. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1, 62–65.Google Scholar
  27. Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Scagnoli, N. (2001). Student orientation for online programs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 19–27.Google Scholar
  29. Schrum, L., & Hong, S. (2002). Dimensions and strategies for online success: Voices from experienced educators. Journal of Asynchronous Networks, 6(1), 57–67.Google Scholar
  30. Song, L., Singleton, E., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, Q., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2007). Designing support system for multimedia curriculum development in Sanghai. Educational Technology Research Development, 55, 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wojciechowski, A., & Palmer, L. B. (2005). Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success in online classes? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(2). Retrieved from
  33. Yang, C.-C., Tsai, I.-C., Kim, B., Cho, M.-H., & Laffey, J. (2006). Exploring the relationships between students’ academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kent State University-StarkNorth CantonUSA

Personalised recommendations