Educational Technology Research and Development

, Volume 60, Issue 6, pp 1107–1128 | Cite as

Learning environments with technological resources: a look at their contribution to student performance in Latin American elementary schools

  • Marcela Román Carrasco
  • F. Javier Murillo Torrecilla
International Review

Abstract

Research shows that computer access and use has a positive effect on the performance reached by Latin American schoolchildren in sixth grade. This is supported by Multilevel models of 4 and 3 levels with data from the Second Regional Comparative and Explanatory Study, developed by UNESCO (2008) in 16 countries and analyzing around 3,000 schools, some 92,000 sixth grade students and 3,900 teachers. The results: Barely one-third of Latin American sixth graders have a computer in their home, and schools where these children attend are unable to reverse this. Furthermore, there is a marked deficit of computers at home and schools in rural areas. Data shows that school performance in reading and math increases significantly among those students that have a computer in their home, an increase that is greater among those students that have at their disposal >10 computers at school. In turn, increased use, both by pupils and teachers, improves school performance in both disciplines once the following variables are controlled: socio-economic level, family culture, gender, mother tongue and number of pre-school years.

Keywords

Access and use of ICT Latin America School performance Primary education 

References

  1. Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, 41. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/218525261154.
  2. Anderson, R. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 5–22). Nueva York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2002). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning. Economic Journal, 112(482), 735–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Area, M. (2007). Algunos principios para el desarrollo de “buenas prácticas” pedagógicas con las TIC en el aula. Comunicación y pedagogía: Nuevas tecnologías y recursos didácticos, No. 222 (pp. 42–47).Google Scholar
  5. Area, M. (2008). Innovación pedagógica con TIC y las competencias informacionales y digitales. Investigación en la Escuela, 64, 5–18.Google Scholar
  6. Balanskat, A., & Blamire, R. (2007). ICT in schools: Trends, innovations and issues in 20062007. Brussels: European Schoolnet. http://insight.eun.org/shared/data/pdf/ict_in_schools_2006-7_final.pdf. Accessed 18 Dec 2008.
  7. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report. A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/education/pdf/doc254_en.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2010.
  8. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabero, J. (coord.). (2006). Nuevas tecnologías aplicadas a la educación. Madrid: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Carrillo, P., Onofa, M., & Ponce, J. (2010). Information technology and student achievement: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Ecuador. Washington, DC: BID. http://www.iadb.org/res/publications/pubfiles/pubIDB-WP-223.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2011.
  11. Carstens, R., & Pelgrum, W. (Eds.). (2009). Second information technology in education study. SITES 2006 technical report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/SITES_2006_Technical_Report.pdf. Accessed 06 May 2011.
  12. CEPAL (2010). Panorama Social Panorama de América Latina. Santiago: CEPAL.Google Scholar
  13. Chong, A. (Ed.). (2011). Conexiones del desarrollo: Impacto de las nuevas tecnologías de la información. Serie Desarrollo en las Américas (DIA). Washington, DC: BID. http://www.iadb.org/es/investigacion-y-datos/publicacion-dia,3185.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2011.
  14. Claro, M. (2010). Impacto de las TIC en los aprendizajes de los estudiantes. Estado del arte. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL. http://www.eclac.org/cgi-bin/getProd.asp?xml=/publicaciones/xml/7/40947/P40947.xml&xsl=/dds/tpl/p9f.xsl&base=/tpl-i/top-bottom.xslt. Accessed 07 Apr 2011.
  15. Coll, C. (2008). Aprender y enseñar con las TIC: expectativas, realidad y potencialidades. Boletín de la Institución Libre de Enseñanza, 72, 17–40.Google Scholar
  16. Coll, C., Mauri, T., & Onrubia, J. (2008). Análisis de los usos reales de las TIC en contextos educativos formales: una aproximación sociocultural. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 10(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  17. Condie, R., Munro, B., Seagraves, L., & Kenesson, S. (2007). The impact of ICT in schools: A landscape review. Glasgow: Becta Research.Google Scholar
  18. Cox, M., Abbott, C., Web, M., Blakely, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2004). A review of the research literature relating to ICT and attainment. London: BECTA.Google Scholar
  19. Cox, M., & Marshall, G. (2007). Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know? Education and Information Technologies, 12(2), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dickey, M. (2011). The pragmatics of virtual worlds for K-12 educators: Investigating the affordances and constraints of ActiveWorlds and SecondLife with K-12 in-service teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., & Campuzano, L. (2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20074005/. Accessed 01 Aug 2009.
  24. Eng, T. S. (2005). The impact of ICT on learning: A review of research. International Education Journal, 6(5), 635–650.Google Scholar
  25. Falus, L., & Golber, M. (2010). Recursos, instalaciones y servicios básicos en las escuelas primarias de América Latina. Otra forma que asume la desigualdad educativa. Cuadernos SITEAL, No. 7. Buenos Aires: IIPE-UNESCO. http://www.siteal.iipe-oei.org/cuadernos/256/recursos-instalaciones-y-servicios-basicos-en-las-escuelas-primarias. Accessed 18 May 2011.
  26. Goolsbee, A., & Guryan, J. (2006). The impact of Internet subsidies in public schools. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hinostroza, J. E., & Labbé, C. (2009). Las TIC en Educación: Evidencia nacional e internacional de impactos. Libro Azul de Enlaces. Santiago de Chile: CET-MINEDUC.Google Scholar
  28. ITU. (2009). Measuring the information society: The ICT Development Index. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union, ITU.Google Scholar
  29. Kay, K., & Greenhill, V. (2011). Twenty-first century students need 21st century skills. In G. Wan & D. Gut (Eds.), Bringing schools into the 21st century (pp. 41–65). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaztman, R. (2010). Impacto social de la incorporación de las nuevas tecnologías de información y comunicación en el sistema educativo. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL. http://www.eclac.org/cgi-bin/getProd.asp?xml=/publicaciones/xml/4/41364/P41364.xml&xsl=/dds/tpl/p9f.xsl&base=/dds/tpl/top-bottom.xsl. Accessed 08 Apr 2011.
  31. Kozma, R. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of ICT for education impact: A review. In D. Wagner, B. Day, T. James, R. Kozma, J. Miller, & T. Unwin (Eds.), Monitoring and evaluation of ICT in education projects: A handbook for developing countries (pp. 11–20). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  32. Kulik, J. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O’Neil (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Kulik, J. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say? Virginia: SRI International. http://www.ssa.sri.com/policy/csted/reports/sandt/it/Kulik_ITinK-12_Main_Report.pdf. Accessed 23 Sep 2009.
  34. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Serie: CERC Studies in Comparative Education (Vol. 23). Hong Kong: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Law, N., Yuen, A., & Fox, R. (2011). Educational innovations beyond technology. Nurturing leadership and establishing learning organizations. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Leuven, E., Lindahl, M., Oosterbeek, H., & Webbink, D. (2007). The effect of extra funding for disadvantaged pupils on achievement. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 721–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. LLECE. (2008). Los aprendizajes de los estudiantes de América Latina y el Caribe. Primer Reporte SERCE. Santiago de Chile: OREALC/UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0016/001606/160660s.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2009.
  38. McTighe, J. (2010). Understanding by design and instruction. In R. Marzano (Ed.), On excellence in teaching. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.Google Scholar
  39. Murillo, F. J. (Coord.) (2007). Investigación Iberoamericana sobre Eficacia Escolar. Bogotá: Convenio Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
  40. OECD. (2010). Educational research and innovation: Are the new millennium learners making the grade? Technology use and educational performance in PISA 2006. Paris: OECD-CERI. http://www.oecd.org/document/57/0,3746,en_2649_35845581_45000313_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 03 Dec 2011.
  41. OECD. (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on line. Digital technologies and performance (Vol. VI). doi:10.1787/9789264112995-en. Accessed 03 Dec 2011.
  42. Pearlman, B. (2010). Designing new learning environments to support 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 116–147). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.Google Scholar
  43. Pedró, F. (2006). The new millennium learners: Challenging our views on ICT and learning. Paris: OECD-CERI. http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=848507. Accessed 11 July 2007.
  44. Pedró, F. (2011). Tecnología y escuela: lo que funciona y por qué. Madrid: Fundación Santillana.Google Scholar
  45. Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide education assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pelgrum, W., & Law, N. (2003). ICT in education around the world: Trends, problems and prospects. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001362/136281e.pdf. Accessed 07 Aug 2009.
  47. Plomp, T., & Voogt, J. (2009). Pedagogical practices and ICT use around the world: Findings from the IEA international comparative study SITES 2006. Education and Information Technologies, 14(4), 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. PNUD. (2006). Las nuevas tecnologías: ¿un salto al futuro? Santiago: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, PNUD.Google Scholar
  49. Román, M. (2008). Investigación Latinoamericana sobre Enseñanza Eficaz, ILEE. In UNESCO (Ed.), Eficacia escolar y factores asociados en América Latina y el Caribe (pp. 207–223). Santiago de Chile: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0016/001631/163174s.pdf. Accessed 09 Dec 2009.
  50. Román, M. (2010). Cuatro formas de incorporar las TIC a la enseñanza en el aula. In A. Bilbao & A. Salinas (Eds.), El libro abierto de la informática educativa. Lecciones y desafíos de la Red Enlaces (pp. 105–122). Santiago de Chile: Enlaces, Ministerio de Educación. http://intranet.redenlaces.cl/index.php?id=11414&no_cache=1&uid=3973&org=11413. Accessed 13 July 2011.
  51. Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3–4), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rouse, C., & Krueger, A. (2004). Putting computerized instruction to the test: A randomized evaluation of a ‘scientifically based’ reading program. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Santiago, A., Severin, E., Cristia, J., Ibarrarán, P., Thompson, J., & Cueto, S. (2010). Evaluación experimental del programa “Una laptop por niño” en Perú. BID Educación: Aportes. 5.Google Scholar
  54. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Selwyn, N. (2011). Schools and schooling in the digital age: A critical perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. SITES. (2006). Technical report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, IEA.Google Scholar
  58. Sunkel, G. (2007). Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) en la educación en América Latina. Una exploración de indicadores. Santiago: CEPAL.Google Scholar
  59. Sunkel, G., Trucco, D., & Möller, S. (2011). Aprender y enseñar con las tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en América Latina: potenciales beneficios. Santiago: CEPAL. http://www.eclac.cl/cgi-bin/getProd.asp?xml=/publicaciones/xml/9/42669/P42669.xml&xsl=/dds/tpl/p9f.xsl. Accessed 17 Dec 2011.
  60. Trimmel, M., & Bachmann, J. (2004). Cognitive, social, motivational and health aspects of students in laptop classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trucano, M. (2005). Knowledge maps: ICT in education. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  62. UNESCO. (2004). Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en la formación docente. Montevideo: División Educación Superior, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  63. Valiente, O. (2010). 1–1 in education: Current practice, international comparative research evidence and policy implications. OECD Education Working Papers, 44. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5kmjzwfl9vr2-en. Accessed 08 Apr 2011.
  64. Venezky, R. (2002). Quo Vademus? The transformation of schooling in a networked world. Paris: OECD-CERI. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/20/2073054.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2010.
  65. Voogt, J., & Pelgrum, H. (2005). ICT and curriculum change. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 1(2), 157–175.Google Scholar
  66. Wan, G., & Gut, D. M. (Eds.). (2011). Bringing schools into the 21st century. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. Webb, M. E., & Cox, M. J. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yelland, N. (2006). Shift to the future: Rethinking learning with new technologies for young children. Nueva York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Zhao, Y., Yan, B., & Lei, Y. (2008). The logic and logic model of technology evaluation. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 633–656). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcela Román Carrasco
    • 1
  • F. Javier Murillo Torrecilla
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Education Research and Development (CIDE)Universidad Alberto HurtadoSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Autonomous University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations