Fostering personalized learning in science inquiry supported by mobile technologies

Special Issue on Personalized Learning

Abstract

In this paper, we present a mobile technology-assisted seamless learning process design where students were facilitated to develop their personalized and diversified understanding in a primary school’s science topic of the life cycles of various living things. A goal-based approach to experiential learning model was adopted as the pedagogical design to support the student’s personalized learning process. We chose to report the student’s inquiry into the life cycles of the spinach plant and the butterfly to pinpoint the how the student’s personalized learning was fostered in the experiential learning. The learning process consisted of (a) in-class enculturation and question posing; (b) out-of-class field trip observation; (c) on site reflection after observation; (c) data collection and conceptualization of life cycles in the field trip; (d) the hands-on experimentation of growing the spinach plant and rearing a butterfly after the trip at home; (e) creation of animations and composition based on the hands-on experience individually either at home or in class to re-conceptualize the life cycles of the spinach plant and the butterfly, and (f) sharing and evaluation of their work in class. Each student was assigned a smartphone on a 1:1, 24 × 7 basis, which was used by individuals to mediate their seamless learning experience across multiple contexts. Through our analysis of the learning content, processes and products, we illuminate how the goal-based approach applied to mobile-assisted experiential learning facilitates students’ personalized learning and helps them to fulfill their agency in such learning experiences.

Keywords

Personalized learning Experiential learning Goal-based approach Mobile technologies Seamless learning Field trip 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by Singapore’s National Research Foundation, Project ID: NRF2007-IDM005-MOE-008 LCK. We would like to thank Gean Chia, Peter Seow and Baohui Zhang for their contributions to the work reported here.

References

  1. Anderson, C., Domingos, P., & Weld, D. (2001). Personalizing web sites for mobile users WWW ‘01 Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference 2001 (pp. 565–575). Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  2. Aroyo, L., & Dicheva, D. (2004). The new challenges for e-learning: The educational semantic web. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 59–69.Google Scholar
  3. Barbosa, D. N. F., & Geyer, C. F. R. (2005). Pervasive personal pedagogical agent: Mobile agent shall always be with a learner. In Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on mobile learning 2005 (pp. 281–285). Qawra, Malta.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, K. & Maharg, P. (2007). E-simulations in the wild: Interdisciplinary research, design and implementation. In The society of legal scholars annual conference, Durham University, 2007-09-10–2007-09-13, Durham (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  5. Bowen, K. (2011). Mixable: A mobile and connected learning environment. EDUCAUSE Quarterly Magazine, 34(1). Retrieved on February 10, 2012 from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/MixableAMobileandConnectedLear/225849.
  6. Cazden, C. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 432–463). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  7. Chan, T.-W., et al. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, C.-M., & Chung, C.-J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55, 1618–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. de Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). The use of ‘exploratory learning’ for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments. Computers & Education, 52(52), 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falk, J. (2004). The director’s cut: Toward an improved understanding of learning from museums. Science Education, 88(Suppl 1), S83–S96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, M.-J., Huang, H.-S., & Chen, M.-Y. (2007). Constructing a personalized e-learning system based on genetic algorithm and case-based reasoning approach. Expert Systems with Application, 33(3), 551–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hwang, G.-J., Kuo, F.-R., Yin, P.-Y., & Chuang, K.-H. (2010). A heuristic algorithm for planning personalized learning paths for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54(2), 404–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobson, M. J., So, H.-J., Teo, T., Lee, J., Pathak, S., & Lossman, H. (2010). Epistemology and learning: Impact on pedagogical practices and technology use in Singapore schools. Computers& Education, 55(4), 1694–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Järvelä, S., Naykki, P., Laru, J., & Luokkanen, T. (2007). Structuring and regulating collaborative learning in higher education with wireless networks and mobile tools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 71–79. Google Scholar
  17. Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Marra, R. M., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2007). Motivation and mobile devices: Exploring the role of appropriation and coping strategies. ALT-J, 15(3), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kerawalla, L., O’Connor, J., Underwood, J., duBoulay, B., Holmberg, J., Luckin, R., et al. (2007). Exploring the potential of the homework system and Tablet PCs to support continuity of numeracy practices between home and primary school. Educational Media International, 44(4), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Lai, C.-H., Yang, J.-C., Chen, F.-C., Ho, C.-W., & Chan, T.-W. (2007). Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: The interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laurillard, D. (2007) Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: Framing research questions. In Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda. Occasional papers in work-based learning (Vol. 1, pp. 153–175). London: WLE Centre, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  23. Livingstone, S. (2007). Strategies of parental regulation in the media-rich home. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(2), 920–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Looi, C.-K., Seow, P., Zhang, B., So, H. J., Chen, W., & Wong, L.-H. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Looi, C.-K., Wong, L.-H., So, H.-J., Seow, P., Toh, Y., Chen, W., et al. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1120–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Looi, C.-K., Wong, L.-H., & Song, Y. (in press). Mobile computer supported collaborative learning. In: C. Hmelo-Silver, A. O’Donnell, C. Chan & C. Chinn (Eds.), The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Meawad, F. E., & Stubbs, G. (2006). Towards large scale deployment of adaptive mobile learning. Proceedings of international conference on interactive mobile and computer aided learning 2006 (pp. 13–16), Amman, Jordan.Google Scholar
  29. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19, 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Donoghue, J. (Ed.). (2009). Technology-supported environments for personalized learning: Methods and case studies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference—Imprint of IGI Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004). Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning. Paper presented at the 2nd IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education, March 23–25, 2004, JhongLi, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  33. Patten, B., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Computers & Education, 46(3), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pea, R. D., & Maldonado, H. (2006). WILD for learning: Interacting through new computing devices, anytime, anywhere. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 427–442). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Petersen, S. A., & Markiewicz, J. K. (2009). Personalized and contextualized language learning: Choose when, where and what. Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., & Hegedus, S. (2010). From new technological infrastructures to curricular activity systems: Advanced designs for teaching and Learning. In M. Jacobson & P. Reimann (Eds.), Designs for learning environments of the future (pp. 233–262). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rudd, T. (2008). Learning spaces and personalisation workshop outcomes. Bristol, UK: NESTA Futurelab. Retrieved March 16, 2012 from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/event_presentations/Learning_Spaces_and_Personalisation_workshop.pdf.
  38. Schank, R. C., Fano, A., Bell, B., & Jona, M. (1994). The design of goal-based scenarios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(4), 305–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The sage handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221–247). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Song, Y., & Fox, R. (2008). Using PDA for undergraduate student incidental vocabulary learning. ReCALL, 20(3), 290–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 371–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stroup, W. M., & Petrosino, A. J. (2003). An analysis of horizontal and vertical device design for school-related teaching and learning. Education, Communication and Information, 3(3), 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Reconcilable differences? Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 6–11.Google Scholar
  44. Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009). Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education, 53(2), 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wong, L.-H. (2012). A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E19–E23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (in-press). Enculturing self-directed seamless learners: Towards a facilitated seamless learning process framework mediated by mobile technology. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on wireless, mobile, and ubiquitous technology in education 2012, Takamatsu, Japan.Google Scholar
  47. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2009). Adaptable learning pathway generation with ant colony optimization. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 309–326.Google Scholar
  48. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2010). Swarm intelligence—new techniques for adaptive systems to provide learning support. Interactive Learning Environments. Published online: 13 July 2010. Retrieved February 10, 2012 from http://lhwong.home.nie.edu.sg/ILE-swarm_intelligence.pdf.
  49. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2364–2381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wong, L.-H., Song, Y., Chai, C.-S., & Zhan, Y. (2011). Analyzing students’ after-school artifact creation processes in a mobile-assisted language learning environment. Proceedings of international conference on computers in education 2011 (pp. 349–356), Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar
  51. Zhang, B., Chee-Kit, L., Seow, P., Chia, G., Wong, L.-H., Chen, W., et al. (2010). Deconstructing and reconstructing: Transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1504–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao, X. Y., & Okamoto, T. (2011). Adaptive multimedia content delivery for context-aware u-Learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 5(1), 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning Sciences LabNational Institute of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations