An examination of the effect of customized reading modules on diverse secondary students’ reading comprehension and motivation
- 995 Downloads
This research sought to add to a body of knowledge that is severely underrepresented in the scientific literature, the effects of technological tools on reading comprehension and reading motivation in diverse secondary students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. The study implemented an independent silent reading (ISR) program across a 5-month semester in an urban public high school and included 145 participants from nine 10th grade literature classes. The control group took part in no ISR, one treatment group participated in weekly ISR read from a textbook, and another treatment group participated in weekly ISR read from a computer module designed to address essential components of reading. Students were measured on global reading comprehension, text-specific reading assessments, and reading motivation. After controlling for initial skill and disposition levels, the results indicated that students from both ISR groups made greater gains than the control group in global reading comprehension, while the computer reading module group outperformed the textbook group and the control on text-specific assignments and increased their reading motivation to a greater degree than those in the other conditions. This research offers much-needed data on secondary students’ reading achievement and disposition and provides evidence that ISR implemented through the use of instructional technology and cognitive tools has broad potential to address development in these areas.
KeywordsInstructional technology Reading comprehension Motivation Secondary students Adolescents Reading modules
- Bailey, C. T., & Boykin, A. W. (2001). The role of task variability and home contextual factors in the academic performance and task motivation of African American elementary school children. Journal of Negro Education, 70(1), 84–95.Google Scholar
- Burke, J. (2000). Reading reminders. Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook.Google Scholar
- Cuevas, J. A. (2010). Applied cognition in reading: An analysis of reading comprehension in secondary students. Educational Psychology and Special Education Dissertations. Paper 70. Retrieved February 27, 2012 from http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/epse_diss/70.
- Dewitz, P., & Dewitz, P. K. (2003). They can read the words, but they can’t understand: Refining comprehension assessment. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 422–435.Google Scholar
- Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Hock, M., & Mellard, D. (2005). Reading comprehension strategies for adult literacy outcomes. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(3ov), 192–200.Google Scholar
- Howard, W. G., Ellis, H. H., & Rasmussen, K. (2004). From the arcade to the classroom: Capitalizing on students’ sensory rich media preferences in disciplined-based learning. College Student Journal, 38(3), 431–440.Google Scholar
- Krashen, S. D. (2000). Forward. In J. L. Pilgreen (Ed.), The SSR handbook: How to organize and manage a sustained silent reading program (pp.vii–xi). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.Google Scholar
- Merriam, S., Caffarella, R., & Baumgartner, L. (2007). Learning in adulthood. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Pilgreen, J. L. (2000). The SSR handbook: How to organize and manage a sustained silent reading program. Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook Publishers.Google Scholar
- Prensky, M. (2005). Engage me or enrage me: What today’s learners demand. Educause Review, 40(5), 61–64.Google Scholar
- Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 620–627.Google Scholar
- Snapp, J. C., & Glover, J. A. (1990). Advance organizers and study questions. Journal of Educational Research, 83(5), 266–271.Google Scholar
- Tennant, M. (2002). Psychology and adult learning. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- The Governor’s Office of Student Achievement. (2010). Retrieved June 28, 2010 from http://gaosa.org/index.aspx.
- Tracey, D., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.Google Scholar