Theory to reality: a few issues in implementing problem-based learning

  • Woei HungEmail author
Development Article


The success of an intervention depends not only upon its theoretical soundness, but also on proper implementation that reflects the guidelines derived from its theoretical conception. Debates surrounding the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) have focused on its theoretical conception and students’ learning outcomes, but implementation is seemingly absent from the picture. This paper attempts to describe what research evidence is needed to fill in this missing information and provide a clearer picture of PBL. The author examines current PBL implementation practices and identifies potentially confounding variables that may play a role in inconsistent or conflicting research results in PBL. For example, various models of PBL have been developed and implemented to afford the specific instructional needs of the institution or learner population. These PBL models are in fact quite different in terms of the nature of problem solving and the degrees of self-directed learning, which theoretically, should result in different types of learning outcomes. Without distinguishing the models used, the results of comparative PBL research could have been confounded. Furthermore, human factors are another set of confounding variables that could influence the students’ learning processes and consequently affect PBL implementations and research results. To remedy these problems and reach PBL’s full potential, as well as obtain a more accurate picture of PBL as an instructional method and its effects on students’ learning, some fundamental changes are needed.


Problem-based learning Implementation Problem solving Self-directed learning Student learning 


  1. Achilles, C. M., & Hoover, S. P. (1996, November). Exploring problem-based learning (PBL) in grades 612. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL.Google Scholar
  2. Albanese, M. (2000). Problem-based learning: Why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Medical Education, 34, 729–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angeli, C. (2002). Teachers’ practical theories for the design and implementation of problem-based learning. Science Education International, 13(3), 9–15.Google Scholar
  5. Azer, S. A. (2001). Problem-based learning: Challenges, barriers, and outcome issues. Saudi Medical Journal, 22(5), 389–397.Google Scholar
  6. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bring problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (pp. 3–12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Bartlett, F. C. (1968). Remembering. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Belland, B. R., French, B., & Ertmer, P. A. (2009). Validity and problem-based learning research: A review of instruments used to assess intended learning outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 59–89.Google Scholar
  11. Berkson, L. (1993). Problem-based learning: Have the expectations been met? Academic Medicine, 68, S79–S88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cermak, L. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.). (1979). Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Academic Medicine, 75(3), 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coulson, R. L., & Osborne, C. E. (1984). Insuring curricular content in a student-directed problem-based learning program. In H. G. Schmidt & M. L. de Volder (Eds.), Tutorial in problem-based learning program (pp. 225–229). Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  16. Dabbagh, N., & Denisar, K. (2005). Assessing team-based instructional design problem solutions of hierarchical versus heterarchical web-based hypermedia cases. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dabbagh, N. H., Jonassen, D. H., Yueh, H.-P., & Samouilova, M. (2000). Assessing a problem-based learning approach to an introductory instructional design course: A case study. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(3), 60–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dabbagh, N., & Williams-Blijd, C. (2010). Students’ perceptions of their learning experiences in an authentic instructional design context. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 4(1), 6–29.Google Scholar
  19. De Grave, W. S., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1996). Problem-based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science, 24, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Dods, R. F. (1997). An action research study of the effectiveness of problem-based learning in promoting the acquisition and retention of knowledge. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 423–437.Google Scholar
  22. Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Gijselaers, W. H., Schmidt, H. G., & van der Meer, S. B. (1993). Problem effectiveness in a course using problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 68(3), 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dolmans, D. H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (1994). What drives the student in problem-based learning? Medical Education, 28, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2001). Solving problems with group work in problem-based learning: Hold on to the philosophy. Medical Education, 35, 884–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Ertmer, P. A., Glazewski, K. D., Jones, D., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Goktas, Y., Collins, K., et al. (2009). Facilitating technology-enhanced problem-based learning (PBL) in the middle school classroom: An examination of how and why teachers adapt. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(1), 35–54.Google Scholar
  27. Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K-12 teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 40–54.Google Scholar
  28. Farnsworth, C. (1994). Using computer simulations in problem-based learning. In M. Orey (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirty-fifth ADCIS conference (pp. 137–140). Nashville, TN: Omni Press.Google Scholar
  29. Feletti, G., Saunders, N., Smith, A., & Engel, C. (1984). Assessment of independent learning. Medical Teacher, 6, 70–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fiddler, M. B., & Knoll, J. W. (1995). Problem-based learning in an adult liberal learning context: Learner adaptations and feedback. Continuing Higher Education Review, 59(1/2), 13–24.Google Scholar
  31. Gijselaers, W. H., & Schmidt, H. G. (1990). Development and evaluation of a causal model of problem-based learning. In Z. H. Nooman, H. G. Schmidt, & E. S. Ezzat (Eds.), Innovation in medical education, an evaluation of its present status (pp. 95–113). New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Glew, R. H. (2003). The problem with problem-based medical education: Promises not kept. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31(1), 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodnough, K., & Hung, W. (2008). Designing effective problems: Evaluation of 3C3R 9-step design process. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 2(2), 61–90.Google Scholar
  34. Harden, R. M., & Davis, M. H. (1998). The continuum of problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 20(4), 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hitchcock, M. A., & Anderson, A. S. (1997). Dealing with dysfunctional tutorial groups. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 9(1), 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D. (1997). Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning. Instructional Science, 25(2), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hung, W. (2006). The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework for designing problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 55–77.Google Scholar
  40. Hung, W. (2009). The 9-step process for designing PBL problems: Application of the 3C3R model. Educational Research Review, 4(2), 118–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hung, W. Mehl, K., & Holen, J. B. (under review). Problem types and student learning in PBL: Two cases. Teaching in Higher Education. Google Scholar
  42. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Evaluating constructivist learning. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 137–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 6–28.Google Scholar
  47. Kaufman, D. M. (2000). Problem-based learning: Time to step back? Medical Education, 34, 510–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kindler, P., Grant, C., Kulla, S., Poole, G., & Godolphin, W. (2009). Difficult incidents and tutor interventions in problem-based learning tutorials. Medical Education, 43, 866–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Koh, G. C.-H., Khoo, H. E., Wong, M. L., & Koh, D. (2008). The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: A systematic review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 178(1), 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design™ into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredericks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Middle school students’ initial attempts at inquiry in project-based science classrooms. Journal of Learning Sciences, 7, 313–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lieux, E. M. (2001). A skeptic’s look at PBL. In B. Duch, S. E. Groh, & D. E. Allen (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning: A practical “how to” for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline (pp. 223–235). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. Maxwell, N. L., Bellisimo, Y., & Mergendoller, J. (2001). Problem-based learning: Modifying the medical school model for teaching high school economics. The Social Studies, 92(2), 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  56. Moust, J. H. C., van Berkel, H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem-based learning at Maastricht University. Higher Education, 50, 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Murphy, L. B., & McPherson, J. (1989). The group assessment task: A real time test of small group problem based learning. In B. Wallis (Ed.), Problem based learning; the newcastle workshop (pp. 131–143). Newcastle: University of Newcastle Faculty of Medicine.Google Scholar
  58. Neville, A. J. (2009). Problem-based learning and medical education forth years on. Medical Principles and Practice, 18, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Norman, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Neill, P. A. (2000). The role of basic sciences in a problem-based learning clinical curriculum. Medical Education, 34, 608–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oberski, I. M., Matthews-Smith, G., Gary, M., & Carter, D. E. (2004). Assessing problem-based learning with practice portfolios: One innovation too many? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(2), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. ETR&D, 51(2), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Perkins, D. N., & Grotzer, T. A. (2000, April). Models and moves: Focusing on dimensions of causal complexity to achieve deeper scientific understanding. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual conference, New Orleans, LA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 441 698).Google Scholar
  65. Perrenet, J. C., Bouhuijs, P. A. J., & Smits, J. G. M. M. (2000). The suitability of problem-based learning for engineering education: Theory and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(3), 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  67. Rose, L. P. (2001, April). Understanding how PBL teams work: Re-thinking the dimensions of teamwork. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, April 10–14, 2001.Google Scholar
  68. Rothman, A. I. (2000). Problem-based learning: Time to move forward? Medical Education, 34, 509–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Savery, R. J. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  70. Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Assumptions underlying self-directed learning may be false. Medical Education, 34, 243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schmidt, H. G., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & de Vries, M. (1992). Comparing problem-based with conventional education: A review of the University of Limburg medical school experiment. Annals of Community-Oriented Education, 5, 193–198.Google Scholar
  73. Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schultz-Ross, R. A., & Kline, A. E. (1999). Using problem-based learning to teach forensic psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry, 23, 37–41.Google Scholar
  75. Schwartz, P., Stewart, M., & Webb, G. (2001). Problem-based learning: Case studies, experience and practice. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  76. Simons, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Scaffolding disciplined inquiry in problem-based environments. International Journal of Learning, 12(6), 297–305.Google Scholar
  77. Simons, K. D., Klein, J. D., & Brush, T. R. (2004). Instructional strategies utilized during the implementation of a hypermedia, problem-based learning environment: A case study. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15(3), 213–233.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, R. M. (1993). The triple jump examination as an assessment tool in the problem-based medical curriculum at the University of Hawaii. Academic Medicine, 68, 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  80. Spronken-Smith, R., & Harland, T. (2009). Learning to teaching with problem-based learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 138–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Steinert, Y. (2004). Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Medical Education, 38(3), 286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stillings, N. A. (1995). Cognitive psychology: The architecture of the mind. In N. A. Stillings & S. E. Weisler (Eds.), Cognitive science (pp. 15–86). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  83. Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective: A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 44–58.Google Scholar
  84. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar
  85. Taylor, D., & Miflin, B. (2008). Problem-based learning: Where are we now? Medical Teacher, 30, 742–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Swanson, D. B. (1990). Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: State of the art. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. van Gessel, E., Nendaz, M. R., Vermeulen, B., Junod, A., & Vu, N. V. (2003). Basic science development of clinical reasoning from the basic sciences to the clerkships: A longitudinal assessment of medical students’ needs and self-perception after a transitional learning unit. Medical Education, 37, 966–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Van Merrienböer, J. J. G., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2006). Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: Balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vardi, I., & Ciccarelli, M. (2008). Overcoming problems in problem-based learning: A trial of strategies in an undergraduate unit. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vernon, D. T. A., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work: A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Wells, S. H., Warelow, P. J., & Jackson, K. L. (2009). Problem based learning (PBL); A conundrum. Contemporary Nurse, 33(2), 191–201.Google Scholar
  93. Wilkerson, L., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1996). Concluding comments. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wood, T. J., Cunnington, J. P. W., & Norman, G. R. (2000). Assessing the measurement properties of a clinical reasoning exercise. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 12(4), 196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zimitat, C., & Miflin, B. (2003). Using assessment to induct students and staff into the PBL tutorial process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instructional Design & Technology, Department of Teaching & LearningUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations