Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments: a new research agenda
- 2k Downloads
This paper identifies the need for developing new ways to study curiosity in the context of today’s pervasive technologies and unprecedented information access. Curiosity is defined in this paper in a way which incorporates the concomitant constructs of interest and engagement. A theoretical model for curiosity, interest and engagement in new media technology-pervasive learning environments is advanced, taking into consideration personal, situational and contextual factors as influencing variables. While the path associated with curiosity, interest, and engagement during learning and research has remained essentially the same, how individuals tackle research and information-seeking tasks and factors which sustain such efforts have changed. Learning modalities for promoting this theoretical model are discussed leading to a series of recommendations for future research. This article offers a multi-lens perspective on curiosity and suggests a multi-method research agenda for validating such a perspective.
KeywordsCuriosity Interest Engagement New media - ambient learning Contextual factors Cyberlearning Personal factors Situational factors Technology-pervasive learning environments Learning modalities Curiosity research
This research was supported in part by a Science of Learning Catalyst Grant from the National Science Foundation. We would like to recognize the following members of the NSF Science of Learning catalyst research team who contributed to this work: Phyllis Blumenfeld, University of Michigan; Edward Deci, University of Rochester; Jacquelynne Eccles, University of Michigan; Suzanne Hidi, University of Toronto; John Keller, Florida State University; Barbara Koslowski, Cornell University; Tiffany A. Koszalka, Syracuse University; Carol Sansone, University of Utah; and Ann Renninger, Swarthmore College.
- Alexander, P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 273–298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Anderson, J. (2009, October 2). Documentary coverage of IGF-USA by the Imagining the Internet Center: Response from Lee McKnight, Wireless Grids, to Lee Rainie’s ‘What We Don’t Know About the Future of the Internet’. Elon, NC: Imagining the Internet Center, Elon University. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://igfusa.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/response-from-lee-mcknight-wireless-grids-to-lee-rainie%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%98what-we-don%E2%80%99t-know-about-the-future-of-the-internet%E2%80%99/.
- Arnone, M. P., Reynolds, R., & Marshall, T. (2009). The effect of early adolescents’ psychological needs satisfaction upon their perceived competence in information skills and intrinsic motivation for research. School Libraries Worldwide, 15(2), 115–134.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 180–191.Google Scholar
- Bick, M., Kummer, T., Pawlowski, J. M., & Veith, P. (2007). Standards for ambient learning environments. In B. Konig-Ries, F. Lehner, R. Malaka & C. Turker (Eds.), MMS 2007: Mobilität und mobile Informationssysteme; Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of GI-Fachgruppe MMS (pp. 103–114). Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- Borgman, C. L., (Chair) (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge, a 21st century agenda for the National Science Foundation. Report of the NSF Task Force on Cyberlearning. Virginia, US: NSF.Google Scholar
- Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York, USA: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenager: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Day, H. I. (1982). Curiosity and the interested explorer. NSPI Journal, May, 19–22.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Engelhard, G., Jr., & Monsaas, J. A. (1988). Grade level, gender, and school-related curiosity in urban elementary schools. Journal of Educational Research, 82(1), 22–26.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Harter, S. (1980). Manual: A scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
- Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternburg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Clinton, K., Weigel, M., & Robison, A. J. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st Century. Building the field of digital media and learning: an occasional paper on digital media and learning. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
- Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010a). The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
- Johnson, L., Smith, R., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2010b). 2010 Horizon Report: K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
- Kambil, A. (2008). What is your Web 5.0 strategy? Journal of Business Strategy, 29(6), 56–58.Google Scholar
- Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Curious? Discover the missing ingredient to a fulfilling life. New York, NY: William Morrow.Google Scholar
- Kashdan, T. B., & Silvia, P. (2009). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 367–375). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kashdan, T. B., Steger, M. F., & Breen, W. E. (2007). Curiosity. In R. Baumeister & K. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 213–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Nagel, D. (2009, April 24). Students as ‘free agent’ learners. The Journal: Transforming Education Through Technology. Retrieved July 1, 2010, from http://thejournal.com/articles/2009/04/24/students-as-free-agent-learners.aspx.
- Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
- Project Tomorrow. (2010, May). Unleashing the future: Educators “speak up” about the use of emerging technologies for learning - Speak Up 2009 national findings, teachers, aspiring teachers & administrators. Irvine, CA: Project Tomorrow. Retrieved July 1, 2010, from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/.
- Reeve, J. (2006). Extrinsic rewards and inner motivation. In C. Everston, C. M. Weinstein, & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 645–664). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: Controversies and new directions (pp. 373–404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Renninger, K. A. (2007). Interest and motivation in informal science learning. IEEE Computer Society Press. Retrieved from http://www.informalscience.com/researches/Renninger_Commissioned_Paper.pdf.
- Renninger, K. A., Sansone, C., & Smith, J. (2004). Love of learning. In C. Peterson & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (2000). The “how” of goal pursuit: Interest and self-regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 306–309.Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D. (1997). Growing up digital. NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar