An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom
- 763 Downloads
This study employed a case study design (Yin, Case study research, design and methods, 2009) to investigate the processes used by 5th graders to design and develop computer games within the context of their environmental science unit, using the theoretical framework of constructionism. Ten fifth graders designed computer games using Scratch software. The results showed students were able to design functional games, following a learning-by-design process of planning, designing, testing, and sharing. Observations revealed that game design led to opportunities for informal knowledge building and sharing among students. This, in turn, encouraged students to test and improve their designs. The findings support the conclusion that elementary students can develop programming concepts and create computer games when using graphical programming software developed for their level of experience. Insights into the iterative process of learning-by-game design are presented.
KeywordsChildren’s learning Game design Constructionism Programming Environmental education Educational technology
- Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., et al. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271–311.Google Scholar
- Carver, S. (2006). Assessing for deep understanding. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 205–221). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Chapman, R. (2009). Encouraging peer sharing: Learning reflections in a community of designers. In Y. B. Kafai, K. A. Peppler, & R. N. Chapman (Eds.), The computer clubhouse: Constructionism and creativity in youth communities (pp. 81–90). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2000). Alice: A 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts. In Proceedings of 5th Annual CCSC Northeastern Conference (pp. 28–29). Ramapo, NJ.Google Scholar
- Gargarian, G. (1996). The art of design. In Y. B. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 125–160). Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
- Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Software design as learning environment. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Children designers: Interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school (pp. 41–85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y. B. (1998). Video game designs by girls and boys: Variability and consistency of gender differences. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds.), From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 90–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y. B. (2006b). Case-based reasoning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225–242). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kolodner, J. L. (2006). Case-based reasoning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225–242). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lin, J., Yen, L., Yang, M., & Chen., L. (2005). Teaching computer programming in elementary schools: A pilot study. Presented at NECC, Taiwan. Retrieved March 25, 2009, from http://www.stagecast.com/pdf/research/Lin_NECC2005_Paper_RP.pdf.
- Malan D. J., & Leitner, H. H. (2007) Scratch for budding computer scientists. SIGCSE 2007, Covington, KY.Google Scholar
- Maloney, J., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2008). Programming by choice: Urban youth learning programming with Scratch. SIGCSE 2008, Portland, OR, USA. Retrieved March 20, 2009 from http://info.scratch.mit.edu/Research.
- Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
- Papert, S. (1993a). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Papert, S. (1993b). The children’s machine: Rethinking schools in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Peppler, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2007a). What video game making can teach us about learning and literacy: Alternative pathways into participatory cultures. Tokyo, Japan: The Digital International Game Research Association Meeting.Google Scholar
- Rieber, L.P., Luke, N., & Smith, J. (1998). Project KID DESIGNER: Constructivism at work through play. Meridian: Middle School Computer Technology Journal, 1(1). Retrieved May 12, 2009, from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/jan98/index.htm.
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Squire, K. (2006). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2(3). Retrieved August 15, 2010, from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol1_issue6/Changing_the_Game_What_Happens_When_Video_Games_Enter_the_Classroom_pdf.
- Tangdhanakanond, K., Pitiyanuwat, S., & Archwamety, T. (2006). A development of portfolio for learning assessment of students taught by full-scale constructionism approach at Darunsikkhalai School. Education, 13(2), 24–36.Google Scholar
- Tiong, K., & Yong, S. (2008). Learning through computer game design: Possible success (or failure) factors. The 16th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 947–951). Retrieved May 12, 2009, from http://www.apsce.net/ICCE2008/papers/ICCE2008-paper293.pdf.
- Van Eck, R. (2006). Using games to promote girls’ positive attitudes toward technology. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2(3). Retrieved August 11, 2010, from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol2_issue3/Using_Games_to_Promote_Girls’_Positive_Attitudes_Toward_Technology.pdf.
- Warren, S. J., Dondlinger, M. J., & Barab, S. A. (2008). A MUVE towards PBL writing: Effects of a digital learning environment designed to improve elementary student writing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 113–140.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research, design and methods (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar