Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning

Research Article

Abstract

The present study investigated the impact of class lecture webcasts on students’ attendance and learning. The research design employed four data collection methods in two class sections—one with webcast access and another without—of the same course taught by the same instructors. Results indicated the following four major findings. (1) The availability of webcasts negatively impacted student attendance but the availability of other online resources such as PowerPoint slides had a greater negative impact on attendance. (2) Webcast access appeared to nullify the negative effects absenteeism had on student performance. (3) For most performance measures based on lecture content, more webcast viewing was associated with higher performance. (4) Most students in the webcast section reported positive learning experiences and benefits from using webcasts, even though a majority also reported using webcasts for missing a class. In summary, these results collectively suggest that webcasts could have positive effects on students’ learning experiences and performance, even if class attendance does decline.

Keywords

Webcasting Podcasting Attendance Student learning Student performance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with support from Division of Instructional Innovation and Assessment at the University of Texas at Austin.

References

  1. Acharya, C. (2003). NUSCast survey. Paper presented at the conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved February 1, 2008 from https://team.nus.edu.sg/cdtl/staff/Research/CDTLMSNo_4.pdf.
  2. Baecker, R. M., Moore, G., & Zijdemans, A. (2003). Reinventing the lecture: Webcasting made interactive. In Proceedings of the HCI international. Retrieved July 26, 2007 from http://epresence.tv/downloads_fileSources/reinventingLectureRoom.pdf.
  3. Bell, S. (2003). Cyber-guest lecturers: Using webcasts as a teaching tool. TechTrends, 47(4), 10–14. doi:10.1007/BF02763506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brittain, S., Glowacki, P., Ittersum, J. V., & Johnson, L. (2006). Podcasting lectures. Educause Quarterly, 3. Retrieved February 25, 2008 from http://connect.educause.edu/Library/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/PodcastingLectures/39987.
  5. Brotherton, J., & Abowd, G. (2004). Lessons learned from eclass: Assessing automated capture and access in the classroom. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(2), 121–155. doi:10.1145/1005361.1005362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Day, J., & Foley, J. (2006, April). Evaluating web lectures: A case study from HCI. Paper presented at the conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved February 1, 2008 from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1125493.
  7. Dhonau, S., & McAlpine, D. (2002). “Streaming” best practices: Using digital video-teaching segments in the FL/ESL methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 35(6), 632–636. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01901.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolnicar, S. (2005). Should we still lecture or just post examination questions on the Web? The nature of the shift towards pragmatism in undergraduate lecture attendance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(2), 103–111. doi:10.1080/13538320500175027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman, P., Rodriguez, F., & McComb, J. (2001). Why students do and do not attend classes: Myths and Realities. College Teaching, 49(4), 124–133.Google Scholar
  10. Green, S. M., Voegeli, D., & Harrison, M. (2003). Evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning in a first-year life sciences course for student nurses. Nurse Education Today, 23(4), 255–261. doi:10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00014-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gump, S. E. (2005). The cost of cutting class: Attendance as a predictor of student success. College Teaching, 53(1), 21–26. doi:10.3200/CTCH.53.1.21-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hargis, J., & Wilson, D. (2005). Fishing for learning with a podcast net. Jacksonville: University of North Florida.Google Scholar
  13. Harley, D., Henke, J., Lawrence, S., McMartin, F., Maher, M., Gawlik, M., et al. (2003). Costs, culture, and complexity: An analysis of technology enhancements in a large lecture course at UC Berkeley. Retrieved June 30, 2006 from University of California, Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cshe/CSHE3-03.
  14. Jones, S. E. (2007). Reflections on the lecture: Outmoded medium or instrument of inspiration? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(4), 397–406. doi:10.1080/03098770701656816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maag, M. (2006). Podcasting and MP3 players: Emerging education technologies. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 24(1), 9–13. doi:10.1097/00024665-200601000-00005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multi-media learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mitchell, L. (2006, October 30). iPods cast a wide net for learning. The Age. Retrieved May 28, 2009 from http://www.theage.com.au/news/education-news/ipods-cast-a-wide-net-for-learning/2006/10/27/1161749321278.html.
  18. Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 149–158. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oliver, B. (2005). Mobile blogging, ‘Skyping’ and podcasting: Targeting undergraduates’ communication skills in transnational learning contexts [electronic version]. Microlearning, 157–162. Retrieved February 27, 2008 from http://www.microlearning.org/micropapers/microlearning2005_proceedings_digitalversion.pdf.
  21. Reynolds, P. A., & Mason, R. (2002). On-line video media for continuing professional development in dentistry. Computers & Education, 39(1), 65–98. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00026-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Romer, D. (1993). Do students go to class? Should they? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 167–174.Google Scholar
  23. Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 295–308. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Woodfield, R., Jessop, D., & McMillan, L. (2002). Gender differences in undergraduate attendance rate. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/03075070500340127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wyatt, G. (1992). Skipping class: An analysis of absenteeism among first-year college students. Teaching Sociology, 20, 201–207. doi:10.2307/1319061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zupancic, B., & Horz, H. (2002, June). Lecture recording and its use in a traditional university course. Paper presented at the annual joint conference integrating technology into computer science education, Aarhus, Denmark. Retrieved February 1, 2008 from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=544424.

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomoko Traphagan
    • 1
  • John V. Kucsera
    • 2
  • Kyoko Kishi
    • 2
  1. 1.Texas Education AgencyAustinUSA
  2. 2.The University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations