Advertisement

A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice

  • Theodore J. KopchaEmail author
Development Article

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present a systems-based mentoring model of technology integration that follows a research-based path. The model moves teachers through four specific stages of technology adoption toward using technology to support learning in more student-centered ways. The model describes how a mentor can negotiate the interplay of multiple barriers (time, beliefs, access, professional development, culture) on teachers who are learning to integrate technology and suggests a number of strategies for integrating technology, such as establishing a culture of technology integration, modeling technology use, and creating teacher leaders. Unlike previous mentoring approaches to integrating technology into the classroom, this model culminates with the establishment of a teacher-led community of practice that uses the resources currently available at a school to support and sustain the implementation of the system. Suggestions for implementing the model in a variety of K-12 and higher education settings are discussed.

Keywords

Technology integration Model of technology integration Mentoring Community of practice 

Notes

Acknowledegment

The author would like to thank Robert Atkinson, Ph.D. and Eric Lindner at Arizona State University for their suggestions during the initial stages of conceptualizing the model.

References

  1. Abramovich, S. (2006). Early algebra with graphics software as a type II application of technology. Computers in the Schools, 22(3–4), 21–33. doi: 10.1300/J025v22n03_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamy, P., & Heinecke, W. (2005). The influence of organizational culture on technology integration in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 233–255.Google Scholar
  3. Atkins, N. E., & Vasu, E. S. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usages and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 279–302.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, A. E., Harmes, J. C., & Kamker, K. (2005). Authentic instruction in laptop classrooms: Sample lessons that integrate type II applications. Computers in the Schools, 22(3–4), 119–130. doi: 10.1300/J025v22n03_10.Google Scholar
  5. Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. L. (2001). Computer use by teachers: Are cuban’s predictions correct? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, L. K. (2002). Technology for teaching and learning: Strategies for staff development and follow-up support. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 131–150.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, C. (2007). Learning through multimedia construction—A complex strategy. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(2), 93–124.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Deguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
  10. Brzycki, D., & Dudt, K. (2005). Overcoming barriers to technology use in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 619–641.Google Scholar
  11. Bullock, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: An examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as they attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211–237.Google Scholar
  12. Chuang, H., Thompson, A., & Schmidt, D. (2003). Faculty technology mentoring programs: Major trends in the literature. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(4), 101–106.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, K. (2006). Practices for the use of technology in high schools: A Delphi study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 481–499.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, K., Simkins, M., & Penuel, W. R. (2002). Learning to teach with technology: Strategies for inservice professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 431–455.Google Scholar
  15. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school clasrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–836. doi: 10.3102/00028312038004813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The Systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Donovan, L., Hartley, K., & Strudler, N. (2007). Teacher concerns during initial implementation of a one-to-one laptop initiative at the middle school level. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 263–286.Google Scholar
  18. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 1–16). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
  20. Easley, L., & Hoffman, S. (2000). Creating an electronic classroom: A practical guide. International Journal of Social Education, 15(1), 80–93.Google Scholar
  21. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. doi: 10.1007/BF02299597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ertmer, P. A. (2001). Responsive instructional design: Scaffolding the adoption and change process. Educational Technology, 41(6), 33–38.Google Scholar
  23. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 41–56. doi: 10.1007/BF02504683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feist, L. (2003). Removing barriers to professional development. T.H.E. Journal, 30(11), 30–36.Google Scholar
  25. Finley, L., & Hartman, D. (2004). Institutional change and resistance: Teacher preparatory faculty and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 319–337.Google Scholar
  26. Forcier, R. C., & Descy, D. E. (2008). The computer as an educational tool: Productivity and problem solving (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Franklin, T., Turner, S., Kariuki, M., & Duran, M. (2001). Mentoring overcomes barriers to technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(1), 26–31.Google Scholar
  28. Friedrichsen, P. M., Dana, T. M., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Tsur, C. (2001). Learning to teach with technology model: Implementation in secondary science teacher education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(4), 377–394.Google Scholar
  29. Gallagher, S. (2000). Classroom-based technology training for inservice teachers. In C. Crawford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference, 2000 (pp. 633–635). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  30. Glazer, E., Hannafin, M. J., & Song, L. (2005). Promoting technology integration through collaborative apprenticeships. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 57–67. doi: 10.1007/BF02504685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers and Education, 49, 385–395. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hinson, J., LaPrairie, K., & Heroman, D. (2005). One size does not fit all: The technology integration model. THE Journal, Technology Horizons in K-12 Education, 32(11), 26–30.Google Scholar
  34. Hinson, J., LaPrairie, K., & Heroman, D. (2006). A failed effort to overcome tech barriers in a K-12 setting: What went wrong and why. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 148–158.Google Scholar
  35. Hu, P. J.-H., Clark, T. H. K., & Ma, W. W. (2007). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information and Management, 41, 227–241. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00050-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hughes, J. (2004). Technology learning principles for preservice and in-service teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3), 345–362.Google Scholar
  37. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.Google Scholar
  38. Hughes, J. E., & Ooms, A. (2004). Content-focused technology inquiry groups: Preparing urban teachers to integrate technology to transform student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 397–411.Google Scholar
  39. Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Marra, R., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  41. Kanaya, T., Light, D., & Culp, K. M. (2005). Factors influencing outcomes from a technology-focused professional development program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 313–329.Google Scholar
  42. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102.Google Scholar
  43. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers and Education, 49, 740–762. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kopcha, T. J., & Sullivan, H. J. (2007). Self-presentation bias in surveys of teachers’ educational technology practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(3), 265–286.Google Scholar
  45. Lai, K.-W., Trewen, A., & Pratt, K. (2002). Computer coordinators as change agents: Some New Zealand observations. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 539–551.Google Scholar
  46. Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers and Education, 49, 284–296. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levin, T., & Wadamy, R. (2006–2007). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157–181.Google Scholar
  48. Lim, C. P., & Khine, M. (2006). Managing teachers’ barriers to ICT integration in Singapore schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 97–125.Google Scholar
  49. Machin, S., McNally, S., & Silva, O. (2007). New technology in the schools: Is there a payoff? The Economic Journal, 117(522), 1145–1167. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02070.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marcovitz, D. M. (2000). The roles of computer coordinators in supporting technology in schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 259–273.Google Scholar
  51. Matzen, N. J., & Edmunds, J. A. (2007). Technology as a catalyst for change: The role of professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 417–430.Google Scholar
  52. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  53. Neiderhauser, D. S., & Lindstrom, D. L. (2006). Addressing the NETS for students through constructivist technology use in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 91–128. doi: 10.2190/E0X3-9CH0-EE2B-PLXG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
  55. Polselli, R. (2002). Combining web-based training and mentorship to improve technology integration in the K-12 classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 247–272.Google Scholar
  56. Rakes, G. C., Fields, V. S., & Cox, K. E. (2006). The influence of teachers’ technology use on instructional practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 409–424.Google Scholar
  57. Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1996). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  58. Rochelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadly, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2001). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101. doi: 10.2307/1602690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, S. J., & Smith, S. B. (2004). Technology integration solutions: Preservice student interns as mentors. Assistive Technology: Benefits and Outcomes, 1, 42–56.Google Scholar
  60. Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2001–2002). Thrust into technology: How veteran teachers respond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(1), 85–111. doi: 10.2190/YDL7-XH09-RLJ6-MTP1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Staples, A., Pugach, M. C., & Himes, D. (2005). Rethinking the technology integration challenge: Cases from three urban elementary schools. Journal from Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 285–311.Google Scholar
  62. Swan, B., & Dixon, J. (2006). The effects of mentor-supported technology professional development on middle school mathematics teachers’ attitudes and practice. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 67–86.Google Scholar
  63. Swan, K., Holmes, A., Vargas, J. D., Jennings, S., Meier, E., & Rubenfeld, L. (2002). Situated professional development and technology integration: The capital area technology and inquiry in education (CATIE) mentoring program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 169–190.Google Scholar
  64. Vanatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–271.Google Scholar
  65. Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2007). The impact of technology on the enactment of “Inquiry” in a technology enthusiast’s sixth grade science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 154–182. doi: 10.1002/tea.20158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ward, J. R., West, L. S., & Isaak, T. J. (2002). Mentoring: A strategy for change in teacher technology education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 553–569.Google Scholar
  67. Wells, J., & Lewis, L. (2006). Internet access in US public schools and classrooms: 1994–2005 (NCES 2007–020). US Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  68. Whitehead, B., Jensen, D., & Boschee, F. (2003). Planning for technology: A guide for school administrators, technology coordinators, and curriculum leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  69. Whitfield, C. M., & Latimer, B. T. (2003). A model for technology integration. Learning and Leading with Technology, 30(4), 50–55.Google Scholar
  70. Zhao, Y., Lei, J., & Frank, K. A. (2006). The social life of technology: An ecological analysis of technology diffusion in schools. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1(2), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. doi: 10.3102/00028312040004807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational TechnologySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations