Educational Technology Research and Development

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 93–100 | Cite as

Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: a summary and critical analysis

  • Roger Azevedo
  • Michael J. Jacobson
Research Article

Hypermedia learning environments such as the World Wide Web and CD based multimedia encyclopedias are extensively used in education, frequently with the intent of helping students learn challenging educational subjects. However, we caution educators, instructional designers, and researchers not to be seduced by design approaches for hypermedia environments that allow learners to access, manipulate, or restructure multiple representations of information while receiving little or no scaffolding during learning. As the authors of this special issue demonstrate, learning with hypertext and hypermedia is challenging for learners of all ages and that systematic and carefully designed research is needed in order to contribute to our understanding of how to promote learning with non-linear systems such as these. We further argue that hypermedia design approaches should be informed by empirical research with multiple methodologies from various disciplines rather than adopting ad hoc or...


Declarative Knowledge Scaffolding Learning Metacognitive Monitoring Human Tutor Theoretical Plurality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Azevedo, R. (in press). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction.Google Scholar
  2. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33, 381–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F., (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., & Winters, F. I. (this volume). Why is externally-facilitated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research & Development, doi:  10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0.
  6. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., & Donovan, S. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 6(2–3), 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples to improve transfer to novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gerjets, P. H., & Hesse, F. W. (2004). When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learning activities and of students” conceptions of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Schuh, J. (this volume). Information comparisons in example-based hypermedia environments: Supporting learners with processing prompts and an interactive comparison tool. Educational Technology Research & Development, doi:  10.1007/s11423-007-9068-z.
  13. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Tack, W. H. (2000). Resource-adaptive selection of strategies in learning from worked-out examples. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference from the cognitive science society (pp. 166–171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobson, M. J. (2006). From non-adaptive to adaptive educational hypermedia: Theory, research, and design issues. In G. Magoulas & S. Chen (Eds.), Advances in web-based education: Personalized learning environments (pp. 302–330). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobson, M. J. (this volume). A design framework for educational hypermedia systems: Theory, research, and learning emerging scientific conceptual structures. Educational Technology Research & Development, doi:  10.1007/s11423-007-9065-2.
  16. Jacobson, M., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 149–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobson, M. J., & Azevedo, R. (this volume). Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: Theoretical, empirical, and design issues. Educational Technology Research & Development, doi:  10.1007/s11423-007-9066-1.
  18. Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1996). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(3/4), 239–281.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(5), 301–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(6), 569–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mayer, R. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shapiro, A. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shapiro, A. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 9, 57–78.Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro, A. M. (2005). Site map principle. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 313–324). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Shapiro, A. (this volume). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Educational Technology Research & Development, doi:  10.1007/s11423-007-9063-4.
  30. Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for education communications and technology (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Tergan, S. (1997a). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext/hypermedia design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(3), 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tergan, S. (1997b). Misleading theoretical assumptions in hypertext/hypermedia research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(3–4), 257–283.Google Scholar
  35. VanLehn, K. (1989). Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 527–579). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Institute for Intelligent SystemsUniversity of MemphisMemphisUSA
  2. 2.Learning Science Laboratory, National Institute of EducationNanynag Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations