The cultural interface tension: doing Indigenous work in the academy
This article explores Vanessa Anthony-Stevens and Sammy Matsaw’s paper “The productive uncertainty of Indigenous and decolonizing methodologies in the preparation of interdisciplinary STEM researchers”. That paper reports on a small qualitative study on how STEM students in the field of natural resources management react to the inclusion of Indigenous ways of knowing in their interdisciplinary research methodologies course. The authors are engaging contested intersections of knowledge that are notoriously difficult to negotiate. I argue that the inclusion of Indigenous ‘ways of knowing’ into the water resource management curriculum is based on Morgan’s (in: McKinley, Smith (eds) Handbook of indigenous education, Springer, Singapore, pp 111–128, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3899-0) idea of the ‘guest paradigm’. At the same time, and in contrast, I also argue that the inclusion of Indigenous knowledge in the curriculum cannot just occur in the classroom but needs to be considered at an institutional and individual level as well. The project should be seen as a small step within a wider Indigenous agenda of decolonizing the Eurocentric curriculum.
KeywordsIndigenous knowledges Decolonizing methodologies Ways of knowing Indigenous curriculum
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Publishers.Google Scholar
- McKinley, E., & Gan, M. (2014). Culturally responsive science education for Indigenous and ethnic minority students. In S. Abell, & Lederman, N. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Volume II (pp. 284–300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Smith, G. H. (1997). Kaupapa Māori: Theory and praxis. PhD Thesis and Monograph. Auckland, New Zealand: The International Research Institute of Māori and Indigenous Education, Faculty of Education, University of Auckland.Google Scholar