The cultural interface tension: doing Indigenous work in the academy

  • Elizabeth McKinleyEmail author


This article explores Vanessa Anthony-Stevens and Sammy Matsaw’s paper “The productive uncertainty of Indigenous and decolonizing methodologies in the preparation of interdisciplinary STEM researchers”. That paper reports on a small qualitative study on how STEM students in the field of natural resources management react to the inclusion of Indigenous ways of knowing in their interdisciplinary research methodologies course. The authors are engaging contested intersections of knowledge that are notoriously difficult to negotiate. I argue that the inclusion of Indigenous ‘ways of knowing’ into the water resource management curriculum is based on Morgan’s (in: McKinley, Smith (eds) Handbook of indigenous education, Springer, Singapore, pp 111–128, 2019. idea of the ‘guest paradigm’. At the same time, and in contrast, I also argue that the inclusion of Indigenous knowledge in the curriculum cannot just occur in the classroom but needs to be considered at an institutional and individual level as well. The project should be seen as a small step within a wider Indigenous agenda of decolonizing the Eurocentric curriculum.


Indigenous knowledges Decolonizing methodologies Ways of knowing Indigenous curriculum 



  1. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Grande, S. (2019). Refusing the settler society of the spectacle. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 1013–1027). Singapore: Springer. Scholar
  3. Jackson, M. (2019). In the end “The hope of decolonization”. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 101–110). Singapore: Springer. Scholar
  4. McKinley, E. (2007). Bodies of knowledge: Narratives of colonialism, science and education. In K. Tobin & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), The culture of science education (pp. 343–354). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McKinley, E., & Gan, M. (2014). Culturally responsive science education for Indigenous and ethnic minority students. In S. Abell, & Lederman, N. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Volume II (pp. 284–300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. McKinley, E., & Smith, L. T. (2019). Towards self-determination in Indigenous education research: An introduction. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 1–15). Singapore: Springer. Scholar
  7. Morgan, B. (2019). Beyond the guest paradigm: Eurocentric education and aboriginal peoples in NSW. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 111–128). Singapore: Springer. Scholar
  8. Morse, J. (2006). The politics of evidence. Qualitative Health Research,16(3), 395–404. Scholar
  9. Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education (Supplement),36, 7–14. Scholar
  10. Neri, R. C., Lozano, M., & Gomez, L. M. (2019). (Re)framing resistance to culturally relevant education as a multilevel learning problem. Review of Research in Education,43, 197–226. Scholar
  11. Smith, G. H. (1997). Kaupapa Māori: Theory and praxis. PhD Thesis and Monograph. Auckland, New Zealand: The International Research Institute of Māori and Indigenous Education, Faculty of Education, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, G. H., & Smith, L. T. (2019). Doing Indigenous work: Decolonizing and transforming the academy. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 1075–1101). Singapore: Springer. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations