In search of a better means of increasing student receptivity to science: a look at American Buddhists and their disproportionately high acceptance of the theory of evolution

  • Elizabeth WattsEmail author
Original Paper


This paper examines how Buddhists in America have been able to integrate evolution into their worldview to a much greater extent than other religious groups in the United States. Not only is evolution and science in general in line with the main teachings of Buddhism, but Buddhist teachers in the US have consistently encouraged Buddhists to embrace scientific findings and have even incorporated scientific data on evolutionary theory into their teachings. The fact that Buddhists in America have been able to accept and incorporate evolution into their spiritual practice is direct evidence of the fallacy of fundamentalist claims that the naturalistic reasoning used in scientific endeavor will necessarily lead students and researchers to lose their own spirituality, faith and humanity. By examining the ability for this spiritual practice to embrace science so wholly into their worldview, there may be lessons on how teachers can better remedy students’ misconceptions about the dangers of science with regard to their own faith.


Buddhism Evolution Mindfulness Creationism Science education 


Dieser Beitrag zeigt, wie amerikanische Buddhisten in der Lage sind, Evolution viel mehr in ihr Weltbild zu integrieren, als andere religiöse Gruppen in den USA. Es wird gezeigt, dass Evolution und die allgemeine Wissenschaft nicht nur im Einklang mit den wichtigsten Lehren des Buddhismus stehen, sondern auch, dass buddhistische Lehrer in den USA Buddhisten immer wieder ermutigen, wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse zu akzeptieren. Manche Lehrer verwenden in ihren Lehren sogar wissenschaftliche Daten zur Evolutionstheorie. Die Tatsache, dass Buddhisten in Amerika die Evolutionstheorie in ihrer spirituellen Praxis akzeptieren und integrieren, ist ein direkter Beweis für den Trugschluss fundamentalistischer Behauptungen, dass die naturalistische Argumentation der Wissenschaft notwendigerweise dazu führt, dass Studenten und Forscher ihre eigene Spiritualität, ihren Glauben und ihre Menschlichkeit verlieren. Indem man die Fähigkeit dieser spirituellen Praxis untersucht, die Wissenschaft so vollständig in Ihre Weltsicht zu integrieren, kann gelernt werden, wie Lehrer bei Schülern falsche Vorstellungen über die Gefahren der Wissenschaft in Bezug auf den eigenen Glauben beheben können.


Buddhismus Evolution Achtsamkeit Kreationismus naturwissenschaftliche Bildung 


  1. Alexakos, K. (2009). Science and creationism: A response to Kenneth Tobin. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 4, 495–504. Scholar
  2. Alexakos, K., Pride, L. D., Amat, A., Tsetsakos, P., Lee, K. J., Paylor-Smith, C., et al. (2016). Mindfulness and discussing “thorny” issues in the classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 741–769. Scholar
  3. Bai, H., Scott, C., & Donald, B. (2005). Contemplative pedagogy and revitalization of teacher education. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 55(3), 319–334.Google Scholar
  4. Bielefeldt, C. (2001). Comments on tensions in American Buddhism. Religion & Ethics Newsweekly. Accessed 04 Feb 2018.
  5. Bodhi, B. (1985). Introduction. In I. Buddha Dharm Education Association (Ed.), The Dhammapada: The Buddha’s Path to Wisdom (pp. 5–22). Kandy: Buddhist Publication Center.Google Scholar
  6. Buddanet. (2008). Buddhism in the West. Buddhist Studies: The Buddhist World. Accessed 12 Nov 2016.
  7. Fronsdal, G. (1998). Insight meditation in the United States: Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In C. S. Prebish & K. K. Tanaka (Eds.), The faces of Buddhism in America (pp. 163–182). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fronsdal, G. (Ed.). (2011). The Dhammapada: A new translation of the Buddhist classic with annotations. Bostom: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  9. Guessoum, N. (2018). Religion in science classes heresy or constructive pedagogy? In K. Tobin & L. A. Bryan (Eds.), 13 Questions. Reframing education’s conversation: science (pp. 313–326). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. Hughes, R. (2012). Buddhism in America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lama, D. (2005). The universe in a single atom: The convergence of science and spirituality. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  12. Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography (cultural studies of science education). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Long, D. E. (2012). Science education in a secular age. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(1), 25–38. Scholar
  14. Long, D. E. (2013). Finding Jesus’s magic pineapple: Or, improving science education by improving religious education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(2), 389–398. Scholar
  15. Numbers, R. L. (1998). Darwinism comes to America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Powietrzynska, M. (2015). Heuristics for mindfulness in education and beyond. In C. Milne, K. Tobin, & D. DeGennaro (Eds.), Sociocultural studies and implications for science education (Vol. 12, pp. 59–80)., Cultural Studies of Science Education Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Powietrzynska, M., & Tobin, K. (2015). Mindfulness and science education. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 1–7). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Powietrzynska, M., Tobin, K., & Alexakos, K. (2014). Facing the grand challenges through heuristics and mindfulness. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10, 65–81. Scholar
  19. Prayut, P. P. (1995). Buddhadhamma: Natural laws and values for life. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  20. Roth, W.-M. (1997). The interaction of students’ scientific and religious discourses: Two case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 125–146. Scholar
  21. Roth, W.-M. (2009). Science and religion: What is at stake? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 5–17. Scholar
  22. Seals, M. A. (2010). Teaching students to think critically about science and origins. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Settelmaier, E. (2010). The conflict on genesis: Building an integral bridge between creation and evolution. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skidmore, M. (2005). Burma at the turn of the twenty-first century. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  25. Tobin, K. (2008). Collaborating during turbulent times. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 3, 793–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Watts, E., Levit, G. S., & Hossfeld, U. (2016). Science standards: The foundation of evolution education in the United States. Perspectives in Science, 10, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yahya, H. (2003). A definitive reply to evolutionist propaganda. Kuala Lumpur: Saba Islamic Media.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology Education Research Group, Institute for Zoology and Evolutionary Research, Faculty of the Biological SciencesFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations