Female and minority experiences in an astronomy-based science hobby

  • Rebecca HiteEmail author
  • M. Gail Jones
  • Tom Andre
  • Gina Childers
  • Elysa Corin
Original Paper


Despite policy changes and targeted outreach, issues of underrepresentation persist for women and minorities in science fields. Previous research has explored extrinsic motivational factors for underrepresented groups in both formal educational settings. However, little research has investigated intrinsic motivation within informal educational experiences like active participation in free choice learning activities like a science-based hobby. Interviews were conducted with 17 astronomy hobbyists who self-identified as under-represented individuals (race, ethnicity and gender). Respondents’ hobby experiences and motivational aspects emerged from analysis of the descriptive accounts provided by the interviews. Findings suggested there was a positive relationship between the degree of hobby participation and number of challenges presented in various phases of hobby growth. Additionally, disparities in sampled minorities’ access to authentic Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) experiences served as a factor influencing their hobby motivation and subsequent development. Other factors that influenced minority engagement included differential participation in hobby clubs, lack of access to mentors, and the delay of active hobby participation until adulthood. Findings suggest science hobbies as an avenue to motivate underrepresented groups in science interests. This information may prove useful in guiding next steps regarding policy and research in the under-representation of women and minorities in STEM hobbies and STEM careers alike.


Hobbies Astronomy STEM underrepresentation Motivation Self-determination 



This material is based on research supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1114500.


  1. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. (2012). Astronomy education in the United States: Amateur Astronomers. Retrieved from Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  2. Azevedo, F. S. (2011). Lines of practice: A practice-centered theory of interest relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 147–184.Google Scholar
  3. Bamberger, Y., & Tali, T. (2007). Learning in a personal context: Levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Science Education, 91(1), 75–95.Google Scholar
  4. Berendsen, M. L. (2005). Conceptual astronomy knowledge among amateur astronomers. Astronomy education review, 4(1), 1539.Google Scholar
  5. Black Girls Code. (2014). Retrieved from Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  6. Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16.Google Scholar
  7. Butt, M. (2013). The use of role models to improve engagement of ethnic minority students in secondary school science. School Science Review, 95(350), 110.Google Scholar
  8. Byars-Winston, A. (2014). Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(4), 340–357.Google Scholar
  9. Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.Google Scholar
  10. Carlone, H. B., Huffling, L. D., Tomasek, T., Hegedus, T. A., Matthews, C. E., Allen, M. H., et al. (2015). ‘Unthinkable’ selves: Identity boundary work in a summer field ecology enrichment program for diverse youth. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1524–1546.Google Scholar
  11. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.Google Scholar
  12. Carlone, H. B., Scott, C. M., & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 836–869.Google Scholar
  13. Cashman-Brown, O. (2011). Birds of a feather: The whiteness of birding [White paper]. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from Inter-disciplinary.
  14. Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 656–664.Google Scholar
  15. Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
  16. Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? AIBS Bulletin, 58(3), 192–197.Google Scholar
  17. Conrad, C., Dixson, A., & Green, C. S. (2014). Discussion on gender equity and women of color. A Journal of Women Studies, 35(3), 3–14.Google Scholar
  18. Corin, E. N., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Childers, G. M., & Stevens, V. (2017). Science hobbyists: Active users of the science-learning ecosystem. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(2), 161–180.Google Scholar
  19. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Da Silva Cardoso, E., Dutta, A., Chung-Yi, C., Johnson, E. T., & Kundu, M. (2013). Social-cognitive predictors of STEM career interests and goal persistence in college students with disabilities from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 27(4), 271–284.Google Scholar
  21. Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D., & Tai, R. H. (2013). The association of family influence and initial interest in science. Science Education, 97(3), 396–409.Google Scholar
  22. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Deinstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  25. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.Google Scholar
  26. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008a). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14–34.Google Scholar
  27. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008b). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185.Google Scholar
  28. Dervarics, C. (2010). Plan to consolidate MSI STEM funding raises equity concerns. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 27(4), 6.Google Scholar
  29. Falk, J. H. (Ed.). (2001). Free-choice science education, how we learn science outside of school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  31. Farmer, H. S., Wardrop, J. L., Anderson, M. Z., & Risinger, R. (1995). Women’s career choices: Focus on science, math, and technology careers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 155–170.Google Scholar
  32. Finney, C. (2014). Black faces, white spaces: Reimaging the relationship of African Americans to the great outdoors. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  33. Floyd, M. (1998). Getting beyond marginality and ethnicity: The challenge for race and ethnic studies in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
  34. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.Google Scholar
  35. Garn, A. C., Matthews, M. S., & Jolly, J. L. (2010). Parental influences on the academic motivation of gifted students: A self-determination theory perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 263–272.Google Scholar
  36. Gutiérrez, K. L. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson-Bailey, J. (1999). The ties that bind and the shackles that separate: Race, gender, class, and color in a research process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 6, 659–670.Google Scholar
  39. Jones, G., Andre, T., Childers, G., Corin, E., & Hite, R. (2015). The intersection of formal and informal science education: Development, motivations, and contributions of amateur astronomers and birder hobbyists. Presentation at the association for science teacher education international conference, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  40. Jones, M.G., Childers, G., Andre, T., Corin, E., & Hite, R. (2016). Citizen scientists and science hobbyists: Educating the life-long learner. In Electronic proceedings of the ESERA 2015 conference. Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, part (Vol. 8).Google Scholar
  41. Jones, G., Childers, G., Stevens, V., & Whitley, B. (2012). Investigating science in the community: Providing meaningful contexts for students to engage in the processes of science. The Science Teacher, 79(9), 36–39.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, M. G., Corin, E. N., Andre, T., Childers, G. M., & Stevens, V. (2017). Factors contributing to lifelong science learning: Amateur astronomers and birders. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(3), 412–433.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, G., Taylor, A., & Forrester, J. H. (2011). Developing a scientist: A retrospective look. International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1653–1673.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, M. G., Tretter, T., Paechter, M., Kubasko, D., Bokinsky, A., Andre, T., et al. (2007). Differences in African–American and European–American students’ engagement with nanotechnology experiences: Perceptual position or assessment artifact? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 787–799.Google Scholar
  45. Koskela, H. (1997). Bold walk and breakings: Women’s spatial confidence versus fear of violence. Gender, Place and Culture, 4, 301–319.Google Scholar
  46. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, O. J. (1935). Astronomy as a hobby. The Scientific Monthly, 41(4), 366–368.Google Scholar
  48. Lintott, C. (2015). Galaxy Zoo. Retrieved from Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  49. Little, J., Panelli, R., & Kraack, A. (2005). Women’s fear of crime: A rural perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(2), 151–163.Google Scholar
  50. Liu, C. C., & Falk, J. H. (2014). Serious fun: Viewing hobbyist activities through a learning lens. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 4(4), 343–355.Google Scholar
  51. Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.Google Scholar
  53. Mousis, O., Hueso, R., Beaulieu, J.-P., Bouley, S., Carry, B., Colas, F., et al. (2014). Instrumental methods for professional and amateur collaborations in planetary astronomy. Experimental Astronomy, 38(1), 91–191.Google Scholar
  54. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. National Science Board. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 14-01).Google Scholar
  56. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2015). Characteristics of scientists and engineers in the United States: 2013. Retrieved from Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  57. Oyserman, D., Gant, L., & Ager, J. (1995). A socially contextualized model of African American identity: Possible selves and school persistence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1216–1232.Google Scholar
  58. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  59. Phillips, A. L. (2011). Crowdsourcing gender equity: Ada Lovelace day, and its companion website, aims to raise the profile of women in science and technology. American Scientist, 99(6), 463–464.Google Scholar
  60. Robinson, J. (2005). Relative prevalence of African Americans among bird watchers. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-191 (pp. 1286–1296).Google Scholar
  61. Rodriguez, A. J. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council’s National Science Education Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 19–37.Google Scholar
  62. Roy, H.E., Pocock, M.J.O., Preston, C.D., Roy, D.B., Savage, J., Tweddle, J.C. & Robinson, L.D. (2012). Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring. Final Report on behalf of UK-EOF. NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and Natural History Museum.Google Scholar
  63. Russell, M., & Atwater, M. (2005). Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominately white institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 691–715.Google Scholar
  64. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.Google Scholar
  65. Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: An organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9(4), 701–728.Google Scholar
  66. Saunderson, W. (2001). Issues of women’s fear in urban space: The case of Belfast. Women and Environments International Magazine, 50(51), 28–30.Google Scholar
  67. Schnoor, J. L. (2007). Citizen science. Environmental Science and Technology, 41(17), 5923.Google Scholar
  68. Shah, H. R., & Martinez, L. R. (2016). Current approaches in implementing citizen science in the classroom. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 17(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
  69. Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 175–183.Google Scholar
  70. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75.Google Scholar
  71. Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24(9), 467–471.Google Scholar
  72. Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84.Google Scholar
  73. Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Amateur and professional astronomers: A study of their interrelationships. Urban Life, 10, 433–454.Google Scholar
  74. Tan, E., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2010). Transforming science learning and student participation in sixth grade science: A case study of a low-income, urban, racial minority classroom. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43(1), 38–55.Google Scholar
  75. Tate, E. D., & Linn, M. C. (2005). How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5–6), 483–493.Google Scholar
  76. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). American time use survey2009 result. Retrieved from Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  77. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, Eds.) (A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas & M. Cole [with J. V. Wertsch], Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original manuscripts [ca. 1930–1934]).Google Scholar
  78. Williams, G. C., McGregor, H. A., Sharp, D., Levesque, C., Kouides, R. W., Ryan, R. M., et al. (2006). Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: Supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial. Health Psychology, 25(1), 91–101.Google Scholar
  79. Zimmerman, H. T. (2012). Participating in science at home: Recognition work and learning in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 597–630.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and Instruction, STEM EducationTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Department of STEM EducationNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.School of Education and the Department of PsychologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  4. 4.Department of Teacher Education, Middle Grades/Secondary EducationUniversity of North GeorgiaDahlonegaUSA
  5. 5.Institute for Learning InnovationPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations