Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 707–732 | Cite as

Gathering, interpreting, and positioning children’s narratives in environmental education research

  • Megan J. Sulsberger
Forum

Abstract

Cecilia Caiman and Iann Lundegård’s research highlights that an important goal of education is to equip younger generations with tools for innovation. This specifically applies in the realm of science education, as younger generations will likely require a unique preparation and skillset to tackle the environmental issues they will face in young adulthood and beyond. In their article, the authors position imagination as a tool for innovation and infinite possibility in this realm, and they capture moments of children actively imagining or “blending” their ideas to illustrate their worthiness in the cause of sustainability. In this research, I also realize the value of children’s creative narratives on the path toward building a more collective ethic of environmental care. However, I emphasize that positioning children’s imaginative narratives in an education toward sustainability calls for the study of children’s identities-in-progress, and thus, a rigorous theorization of the context in which these narratives/selves are created. This, in turn, necessitates the use of situated and deep methodological approaches to capture and interpret children’s self-expressions. Through my use of Holland’s figured world concept and an ethnographic case study methodology, this research unpacks narratives similar to those presented in Cecilia and Iann’s research to reveal the complexity of children’s imaginative utterances in a school garden context. I consider the myriad of factors that shape children’s experiences and corresponding expressions to complicate and situate children’s expressions within the larger context of self and care development. Revealing this individualized and layered nature of identity and care development in environmental education research allows for the creation or replication of educational experiences and spaces where innovation and care development can occur.

Keywords

Figured worlds Environmental identity research Ethnographic case study Narrative inquiry School gardens 

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bloome, D., Katz, L., & Champion, T. (2010). Young children’s narratives and ideologies of language in classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(3), 205–223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. (2000). In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1972). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Clayton, L. W., Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance on nature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, B. (1994). Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyson, A. (1994). I’m gonna express myself: The politics of story in the children worlds. In A. H. Dyson & C. Genishi (Eds.), The need for story: Cultural diversity in classroom community (pp. 155–171). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  12. Elliot, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gandini, L. (2011). History, ideas, and basic principles: An interview with Loris Malaguzzi. In C. P. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. E. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed., pp. 27–72). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171(1), 5–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748917100101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Grieshaber, S. J., & Cannella, G. S. (2001). Embracing identities in early childhood education: Diversity and possibilities. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hatt, B. (2007). Street smarts vs. book smarts: The figured world of smartness in the lives of marginalized, urban youth. The Urban Review, 39(3), 145–166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0047-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkins, B. (2002). Children’s drawing, self expression, identity and the imagination. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 21(3), 209–219.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hewett, V. M. (2001). Examining the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 95–100.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012520828095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Holland, D. C., & Lave, J. (2001). History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  23. James, A. (2007). Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 261–272.  https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  25. Janzen, M. (2008). Where is the (postmodern) child in early childhood education research? Early Years, 28(3), 287–298.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140802393827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jurow, A. S. (2005). Shifting engagements in figured worlds: Middle school mathematics students’ participation in an architectural design project. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 35–67.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1401_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitchell, A., Kempton, W., Holland, D., & Tesch, D. (2000). Identities and actions within environmental groups. Human Ecology Review, 7(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  28. Leitch, R. (2006). Limitations of language: Developing arts-based creative narrative in stories of teachers’ identities. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(5), 549–569.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600600832270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “Deep Theorizing” closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 53–388.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308319229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the “community of practice” metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary school classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(2), 129–147.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0802_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malone, K. (2007). The bubble-wrap generation: Children growing up in walled gardens. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 513–527.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701581612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation revised and expanded from qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Nicolopoulou, A. (1997). Worldmaking and identity formation in children’s narrative play-acting. In B. D. Cox & C. Lightfoot (Eds.), Sociogenetic perspectives on internalization (pp. 157–187). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring, a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Payne, P., & Wattchow, B. (2008). Slow pedagogy and placing education in posttraditional outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 12(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 83–92.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3002_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riessman, C. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Rinaldi, C. (2005). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Robinson, C. (2007). Figured world of history learning in social studies methods classroom. The Urban Review, 39(2), 191–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0046-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rubin, B. C. (2007). Learner identities amid figured worlds: Constructing (in)competence at an urban high school. The Urban Review, 39(2), 217–249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0044-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skinner, D., Bryant, D., Coffman, J., & Campbell, F. (1998). Creating risk and promise: Children’s and teachers’ co-constructions in the cultural world of kindergarten. The Elementary School Journal, 98, 297–310.  https://doi.org/10.1086/461897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skinner, D., Valsiner, J., & Holland, D. (2001). Discerning the dialogical self: A theoretical and methodological examination of a Nepali adolescent’s narrative. Qualitative Social Research.  https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.3.913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  46. Sulsberger, M. J. (2009). Peer interaction and socialization: A look at young children’s relationships to nature and early environmental identity formation. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. (Unpublished pilot study).Google Scholar
  47. Talburt, S. (2000). Subject to identity: Knowledge, sexuality, and academic practices in higher education. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  48. Thomashow, M. (1996). Ecological identity: Becoming a reflective environmentalist. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Urrieta, L. (2007). Identity production in figured worlds: How some Mexican Americans become Chicana/o activist educators. The Urban Review, 39(3), 117–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0050-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wake, S. (2008). “In the best interests of the child”: Juggling the geography of children’s gardens (between adult agendas and children’s needs). Children’s Geographies, 6(4), 423–435.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280802338122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State University Monterey BaySeasideUSA

Personalised recommendations