Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 785–796 | Cite as

An Integrative Cultural Model to better situate marginalized science students in postsecondary science education

  • Hagar Ibrahim Labouta
  • Jennifer Dawn Adams
  • David Thomas Cramb
Forum
First Online:

Abstract

In this paper we reflect on the article “I am smart enough to study postsecondary science: a critical discourse analysis of latecomers’ identity construction in an online forum”, by Phoebe Jackson and Gale Seiler (Cult Stud Sci Educ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9818-0). In their article, the authors did a significant amount of qualitative analysis of a discussion on an online forum by four latecomer students with past negative experiences in science education. The students used this online forum as an out-of-class resource to develop a cultural model based on their ability to ask questions together with solidarity as a new optimistic way to position themselves in science. In this forum, we continue by discussing the identity of marginalized science students in relation to resources available in postsecondary science classes. Recent findings on a successful case of a persistent marginalized science student in spite of prior struggles and failures are introduced. Building on their model and our results, we proposed a new cultural model, emphasizing interaction between inside and outside classroom resources which can further our understanding of the identity of marginalized science students. Exploring this cultural model could better explain drop-outs or engagement of marginalized science students to their study. We, then, used this model to reflect on both current traditional and effective teaching and learning practices truncating or re-enforcing relationships of marginalized students with the learning environment. In this way, we aim to further the discussion initiated by Jackson and Seiler and offer possible frameworks for future research on the interactions between marginalized students with past low achievements and other high and mid achieving students, as well as other interactions between resources inside and outside science postsecondary classrooms.

Keywords

Learners’ diversity Marginalized science students Postsecondary science classrooms Student engagement Inclusive instructional practices 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Basu, S. J. (2008). How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant Caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 881–899.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baurhoo, N., & Asghar, A. (2014). Using universal design for learning to construct inclusive science classrooms for diverse learners. Learning Landscapes, 7(2), 59–81.Google Scholar
  3. Bianchini, J. A., Whitney, D. J., Breton, T. D., & Hilton-Brown, B. A. (2002). Toward inclusive science education: University scientists’ views of students, instructional practices, and the nature of science. Science Education, 86(1), 42–78.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradforth, S. E., Miller, E. R., Dichtel, W. R., Leibovich, A. K., Feig, A. L., Martin, J. D., et al. (2015). University learning: Improve undergraduate science education. Nature, 523(7560), 282–284.  https://doi.org/10.1038/523282a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler, D. L., Elaschuk, C. L., Poole, S. L., MacLeod, W. B., & Syer, K. D. (1997). Strategic interventions for post-secondary students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Meeting of Canadian Society for Studies in Education, St. John’s, Newfoundland. http://ecps-educ.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2013/11/CSSE-Paper-1997-condensed-copy.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2017.
  7. Chitty, C. (2001). Selection by specialisation. In C. C. A. B. Simon (Ed.), Promoting comprehensive education in the 21st century. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  8. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. Best Practices in School Psychology, 5, 1099–1120.Google Scholar
  9. Crosling, G., Heagney, M., & Thomas, L. (2009). Improving student retention in higher education: Improving teaching and learning. Australian Universities’ Review, 51(2), 9–18.Google Scholar
  10. Dancy, M. H., & Henderson, C. (2005). Beyond the individual instructor: Systemic constraints in the implementation of research-informed practices. AIP Conference Proceedings, 790(1), 113–116.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2084714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furman, M., & Barton, A. C. (2006). Capturing urban student voices in the creation of a science mini-documentary. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 667–694.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hart, S., Dixon, A., & Drummond, M. J. (2007). Learning without limits. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2008). Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Physics (Physics Education Research Section), 76(1), 79–91.Google Scholar
  14. Ho, F. M. (2017). Reforms in pedagogy and the Confucian tradition: Looking below the surface. Cultural Studies of Science Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9795-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holland, D. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Husbands, C., & Pearce, J. (2012). What makes great pedagogy? Nine claims from research. Nottingham. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/329746/what-makes-great-pedagogy-nine-claims-from-research.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2017.
  17. Jackson, P. A., & Seiler, G. (2013). Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 826–857.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. James, M., Oates, T., Pollard, A., & Wiliam, D. (2011). The framework for the national curriculum. A report by the expert panel for the national curriculum review. London: Department of Education. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/13207/1/NCR-Expert%20Panel%20Report.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2017.
  19. Kovac, J. (1999). Learning style perspectives: Impact in the classroom (Sarasin, Lynne Celli). Journal of Chemical Education, 76(12), 1629.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p1629.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–32.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., & Witt, E. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  22. Lave, J. (1991). Chapter 4: Situating learning in communities of practice. In M. Siegal, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. May, A. L., & Stone, C. A. (2010). Stereotypes of individuals with learning disabilities: Views of college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 483–499.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonald, E. J. (2014). Learning to teach as situated learning: An examination of student teachers as legitimate peripheral participants in cooperating teachers’ classrooms. Ph.D., University of Minnesota, Ann Arbor, MN, USA (3643650).Google Scholar
  26. Moriarty, M. A. (2007). Inclusive pedagogy: Teaching methodologies to reach diverse learners in science instruction. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40(3), 252–265.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680701434353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Research Council. (2011). Promising practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: Summary of two workshops. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using universal design for learning to design standards-based lessons. SAGE Open, 6(4), 2158244016680688.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about Leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  31. Silver, P., Bourke, A., & Strehorn, K. C. (1998). Universal instructional design in higher education: An approach for inclusion. Equity & Excellence in Education, 31(2), 47–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1066568980310206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sprong, M. E., Dallas, B. K., & Upton, T. D. (2014). Post-secondary faculty attitudes toward inclusive teaching strategies. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 80, 12+.Google Scholar
  33. Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41.Google Scholar
  34. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hagar Ibrahim Labouta
    • 1
  • Jennifer Dawn Adams
    • 1
  • David Thomas Cramb
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options